When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
about
Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operationsHow neuroscience will change our view on consciousness.Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.Fooling the eyes: the influence of a sound-induced visual motion illusion on eye movementsConsistency in exchange for inappropriately matched visual feedback? A comment on Franz and Gegenfurtner (2008) "Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation".A common representation of spatial features drives action and perception: grasping and judging object features within trialsThe effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.The scale analysis of number mapping onto space: manual estimation study.Accurate visuomotor control below the perceptual threshold of size discrimination.Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action?Human fMRI reveals that delayed action re-recruits visual perceptionEffects of visual cues of object density on perception and anticipatory control of dexterous manipulationVisuo-haptic interactions in unilateral spatial neglect: the cross modal judd illusion.Left, right, left, right, eyes to the front! Müller-Lyer bias in grasping is not a function of hand used, hand preferred or visual hemifield, but foveation does matter.Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.Failure to see money on a tree: inattentional blindness for objects that guided behavior.Understanding visual consciousness in autism spectrum disordersDifferential effects of forward and backward masks on the relationship between perception and action.Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral systemDissociations between vision for perception and vision for action depend on the relative availability of egocentric and allocentric information.Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?The Impact of Strategic Trajectory Optimization on Illusory Target Biases During Goal-Directed Aiming.Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features.The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing.Using scissors to bisect a line: a perception-action dissociation in complex tool use.The Effects of Optical Illusions in Perception and Action in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space.Speed Biases With Real-Life Video Clips.
P2860
Q21558383-077BB754-EBE7-49C1-9741-162909FBDF43Q30355002-CFA6E055-58B7-44E6-BCB4-EA4714B4E546Q30380658-3C3D4C7A-943E-4907-9482-E0C9E6691D71Q30455096-7F4AF6E0-E3AB-420C-8E37-AC4C6CDE96DBQ33492824-D78F6565-C7D7-4D33-9034-F4419C36867CQ33560195-6ADD3375-4438-48E8-A658-F74ECE7B51CAQ33892125-C2F784A0-98FD-440E-AF60-B47F5B529F96Q33893700-6E2F840E-840A-4012-90E7-2B6AFF3B84F3Q34257371-28E6E6B1-50D8-4183-8956-2C8E615C116CQ34380938-EDB5F99D-49D9-4D4B-8BC7-6B63E1E77811Q34989029-5A13B609-16F0-4772-B781-A0FCC1ED1B45Q35022977-9BD59576-512A-48DC-8B32-ABACF86A7E98Q35567840-C021C240-FA8E-47B0-89AF-D707C546723BQ35859104-894BA72D-66EC-49B3-9584-8D30C65557E2Q36245536-B9749381-F030-4DE2-BD28-E31DAEE96848Q36670161-C4CC394E-B432-490A-9DC4-B4A56539C45CQ37734846-A9E7D7EA-B4F8-4883-ABBB-5B1A7D7AB89BQ39834072-2450BAE0-F4A3-436C-A5CC-13A1BB8D6869Q40094912-12B0ADF1-EC4A-4FAD-A1DB-950B61EB035CQ40387950-E615AD67-9F58-470A-93DC-A2C3B12BCF27Q42259371-47763639-DA8F-409A-834C-806460C0C44FQ44048152-C904BADF-4B66-46CD-85FE-F82704A986BBQ44385553-D0898854-47B4-4421-AC9A-92FBF0623C2FQ47187699-EF2A22CC-89AD-4B96-A29D-F5BD230BC593Q47387412-14CDDD54-0749-4D95-A108-5501C2C88D75Q47592713-505F3B5A-CC79-425E-B53B-308E823D6C28Q48607218-15DD6400-604F-4745-A50D-C531D132BA29Q50091542-C11E58D3-4479-42A2-AC25-C39A02DBBEE0Q50493271-FBFEAFE0-3BAB-4B72-8FFE-52B04379B14BQ51817482-0469C430-DED6-42A5-9664-DE45174EAE6EQ53128242-5C295041-93D9-474E-A8E2-72032BD98A36Q53243274-85B41297-13A0-4C8A-BAA9-72AE80A4D462Q53278302-7283F0B0-EB65-4D21-987F-F1557C8BE582
P2860
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@en
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@nl
type
label
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@en
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@nl
prefLabel
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@en
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
@nl
P1433
P1476
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review
@en
P2093
Nicola Bruno
P304
P356
10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2008.10.031
P577
2008-11-19T00:00:00Z