Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
about
KALK study: ultrasound guided needling and lavage (barbotage) with steroid injection versus sham barbotage with and without steroid injection - protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, controlled, multicenter study.Minimally important change, measurement error, and responsiveness for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score.Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) in patients with subacromial pain syndromeThe Validity and Responsiveness of Isometric Lower Body Multi-Joint Tests of Muscular Strength: a Systematic Review.Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty.The influence of dominant limb involvement on DASH and QuickDASH.Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder ScoreResponsiveness and minimal important change for the ProFitMap-neck questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index in women with neck-shoulder pain.Sick leave in workers with arm, neck and/or shoulder complaints; defining occurrence and discriminative trajectories over a 2-year time period.A new technique of arthroscopic subscapularis repair with 2-year clinical outcomes in an Asian population.Does Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma Affect Postoperative Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Randomized Controlled Trial.Measurement error in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: results from a general adult population in Japan.Smallest detectable change and test-retest reliability of a self-reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire.The iterative process in the development of a parent-reported questionnaire for children with unilateral paresis.Early promising outcome following arthroscopic implantation of the subacromial balloon spacer for treating massive rotator cuff tear.COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.Cervical Lateral Glide Neural Mobilization Is Effective in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List Controlled Clinical Trial.Is pharmacologic treatment better than neural mobilization for cervicobrachial pain? A randomized clinical trial.Can we improve the outcome of hydrodilatation for adhesive capsulitis?Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of ABILHAND-Kids' questionnaire in a group of patients with neuromuscular disorders.Online Self-Administered Cognitive Testing Using the Amsterdam Cognition Scan: Establishing Psychometric Properties and Normative Data.A randomised controlled trial of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the management of rotator cuff related shoulder painThe interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependentThe Japanese Workplace PERMA-Profiler: A validation study among Japanese workers
P2860
Q30843931-42A7F29C-2144-40B2-AE1E-CEA48F9648B0Q33697080-51B11244-E541-4965-B63B-68824E591F3EQ33781426-3B86BF1D-CF4E-4E0F-B449-BA024A7C7DECQ33812399-789D8650-66A9-4B77-BCD4-88B38F2B0C4FQ33927672-9BA25DB0-DA78-48B3-9305-DE23FDC12513Q36001812-A9AA1FF7-EF6D-4CE5-BBD1-AC28CB6808AEQ36405992-A2BA494E-1E23-486E-A0FC-6E50D3199D37Q37070801-B412ED7E-524F-4AD6-B300-8DE2D598E7DDQ37592797-D703760E-F717-42AB-A7FB-C245050141CFQ39344503-3BBB07D5-1549-4CC7-A4B0-09D48E7F1B97Q46093453-AFC03ACB-C8F1-4872-9C25-BAB4E7185BEDQ47430395-E103CA86-185F-47B1-9D6A-DF0CBC1ADAACQ47558841-6BECAF91-3B19-47E6-B6CC-551E151B8DFFQ47657512-3D709644-215B-41E3-B3A7-0906812A2A18Q48321428-1439B966-1082-4B87-8DEA-AEC916AFC2B7Q49904575-86349F7D-4D64-47DA-BBA5-DD794B09F5C8Q50050932-9D91313A-C2C1-4218-B5EC-E4C0C4AC8BDFQ50946911-A7CC405F-965C-4100-A2B8-139361BB1420Q51737520-20C29C88-FD6A-4CA8-82DE-41E2A411CD8AQ52645901-89E7D4B5-8E36-413A-A8E7-4163123A61F9Q53159206-2C33F286-8CB1-4BC9-AC1C-29D6A67C9378Q55347233-7934C74C-65BA-4981-89AF-DA610868F20EQ58586514-E76E161F-3EA2-4510-AF23-62C66D1D9502Q58741431-2473F25E-7D0E-454F-ABE0-071516237320Q58767427-E357D5CA-1438-42BA-B0D0-EAC0ED9BC797
P2860
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Determination and comparison o ...... rted outcome measures (PROMs).
@en
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change
@nl
type
label
Determination and comparison o ...... rted outcome measures (PROMs).
@en
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change
@nl
prefLabel
Determination and comparison o ...... rted outcome measures (PROMs).
@en
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Determination and comparison o ...... rted outcome measures (PROMs).
@en
P2093
Caroline B Terwee
Derk A van Kampen
Loes W A H van Beers
Rene M Castelein
Vanessa A B Scholtes
W Jaap Willems
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
P577
2013-11-14T00:00:00Z
P6179
1024485792