Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.
about
Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectivesPatient follow-up after participating in a beach-based skin cancer screening programPrevalence and correlates of skin cancer screening among middle-aged and older white adults in the United StatesDietary inflammatory index and risk of colorectal cancer in the Iowa Women's Health StudyUsing genetic variation and environmental risk factor data to identify individuals at high risk for age-related macular degenerationValue of laboratory tests in employer-sponsored health risk assessments for newly identifying health conditions: analysis of 52,270 participantsMyPreventiveCare: implementation and dissemination of an interactive preventive health record in three practice-based research networks serving disadvantaged patients--a randomized cluster trial.A patient recall program to enhance decisions about prostate cancer screening: a feasibility studyCT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.Comparison of prostate cancer diagnosis in patients receiving unrelated urological and non-urological cancer care.Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a population-based study.Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.The quality of preventive health care delivered to adults: results from a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy.Behavioral correlates of HPV vaccine acceptability in the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)Risk-based ultrasound screening for thyroid cancer in obese patients is cost-effective.Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting.The diagnostic and prognostic value of serum human kallikrein-related peptidases 11 in non-small cell lung cancerThe 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing.Metastatic prostate cancer in the modern era of PSA screening.Cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains.Development of a melanoma risk prediction model incorporating MC1R genotype and indoor tanning exposure: impact of mole phenotype on model performance.A pilot test of a church-based intervention to promote multiple cancer-screening behaviors among Latinas.Factors associated with cervical cancer screening in Puerto Rico.Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacyTest characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.Molecular markers of endometrial carcinoma detected in uterine aspirates.The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and cancer volume in prostate glands of different sizes.Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion?Is a prostate cancer screening anxiety measure invariant across two different samples of age-appropriate men?Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical applicationColorectal cancer screening among Latinos in three communities on the Texas-Mexico border.Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.Promoting mammography adherence in underserved women: the telephone coaching adherence study.Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.Determinants of usual source of care disparities among African American and Caribbean Black men: findings from the National Survey of American Life.Sulfiredoxin-Peroxiredoxin IV axis promotes human lung cancer progression through modulation of specific phosphokinase signalingAn innovative strategy to reach the underserved for colorectal cancer screening.Correlates of colorectal cancer screening adherence among men who have been screened for prostate cancer.
P2860
Q26992206-8FB2E5FC-BDC5-4929-AA45-09C6059ED765Q28385913-1AAFA45C-0E14-48A5-B9ED-793B98453619Q28395031-C0BA69A9-2822-496C-8E29-7F72EBE355C4Q28397169-E809287D-65A3-429C-92D4-6B728C279A46Q28741677-C9173DA2-87D9-4340-93BB-6E86DDCE5DA4Q28741739-827E96C5-BA35-49B4-BD53-0EDCAFE54ABCQ30609162-017693C2-F61C-46E4-BB73-879A51E3FC61Q30931397-FE058B7E-99E2-4B31-8DA3-36B587AEA24BQ33579804-B64F8FCC-9335-4EAE-B52B-D9BF936B043DQ33581483-CCBAC153-FE83-4B1A-A827-947654FD6E57Q33584218-FF1B331E-0323-4EEE-A55B-D42CEB190C99Q33605457-40CC3A08-C733-4153-8E4B-8C8D05F49391Q33611064-83CA1D96-139B-4B9C-8920-5A3E947FB7F2Q33645694-38EA7191-4E84-48F4-B7D0-94F0173F651FQ33713784-4ADDE566-64B8-4F26-AF53-BB05DE9DF4DAQ33719371-615CC315-4D23-4DBA-A46C-46FCC2EC04FBQ33741243-34B74AF2-E252-473B-BF39-C46C14CC63A1Q33750499-D6FD513C-5E5A-4DC7-BCAF-D73A4A33CE3CQ33772582-76E5E602-8E5F-4B6E-B4EC-F9B5DF298331Q33776759-A4201A06-4029-42EA-9A0F-B0FBDAA09705Q33863654-36F289A1-A541-43A3-B8C6-240C6C3DD4AEQ33874410-11F6625D-7317-4621-92A8-C9B4A9FF6EDFQ33891211-3CE37FCA-8B99-4A47-91E8-1A7E174590D1Q33906228-A3F13C85-77FC-4EBC-9B9A-9C2E3E81FC10Q34084455-5E1BEEE8-D53F-4A44-AD63-1E243FFA38F5Q34157607-2B7CC813-8D0C-41E5-BDF8-1F74F6B18426Q34160358-F000AE5E-A1E3-42D0-A13D-7BCB7FBCAD43Q34288148-6CB583C7-0CB2-4147-BB71-A06BF430D96CQ34292879-7F00E870-C5DB-4584-B602-56DA5CC70162Q34297791-10F7BC0F-2370-4743-900D-6BA7270C8D85Q34326632-7120A13D-C8DA-4BB1-B228-FB3BE8CF435CQ34429304-E7E9105B-67DD-47C0-BAE7-7FFD2A92C739Q34494893-5848B258-0AD3-4793-8CC0-4A441529100DQ34570673-00133EE0-81CA-43B1-AD96-58BE1EE1F36CQ34630175-921FB034-1FA7-4C0D-B9E3-6627715D17B6Q34634268-DDF4B3DA-4A8A-4890-981D-4DBA5D8DD59FQ34707896-09C3061B-5F50-4546-8186-0DE34826013FQ34880902-F8D46B33-BA2C-40AE-A64B-1A0F7FD9E561Q34893271-4B37DE78-38F2-452B-AFFD-652391DEC24BQ34995422-599F853A-6490-4F6C-B10F-5154513C844D
P2860
Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
type
label
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
prefLabel
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
P2093
P3181
P356
P1433
P1476
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
P2093
Otis W Brawley
Robert A Smith
Vilma Cokkinides
P356
10.3322/CAAC.20008
P407
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z