Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
about
The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of MRI for identification and classification of knee osteochondritis dissecansMicro-morphometrical assessment of the effect of Harpagophytum procumbens extract on articular cartilage in rabbits with experimental osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging.Do cartilage repair procedures prevent degenerative meniscus changes?: longitudinal t1ρ and morphological evaluation with 3.0-T MRIRecent advances in MRI of articular cartilage.Implementation of subject-specific collagen architecture of cartilage into a 2D computational model of a knee joint--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) shows no change in cartilage structural composition after viscosupplementation in patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis.Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis of the knee at 3.0 T: comparison of a quantitative and a semi-quantitative score for the assessment of the extent of cartilage lesion and bone marrow edema pattern in a 24-month longitudinal study.Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.Factors associated with meniscal extrusion in knees with or at risk for osteoarthritis: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis study.Responsiveness and reliability of MRI in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of published evidence.Subjects with higher physical activity levels have more severe focal knee lesions diagnosed with 3T MRI: analysis of a non-symptomatic cohort of the osteoarthritis initiativeAcute and Stress-related Injuries of Bone and Cartilage: Pertinent Anatomy, Basic Biomechanics, and Imaging Perspective.The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Understanding Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Cartilage Repair: A Focus on Clinical Relevance.Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Asymptomatic Knees in Collegiate Basketball Players: The Effect of One Season of Play.Association of changes in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) with changes in cartilage thickness in the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the knee: a 2 year follow-up study using 3.0 T MRI.Comparison of a fast 5-min knee MRI protocol with a standard knee MRI protocol: a multi-institutional multi-reader study.[Morphological and functional cartilage imaging].Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy.Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the kneeAxial-Oblique Versus Standard Axial 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Trochlear Cartilage Lesions: A Prospective StudyClinical Management of Articular Cartilage LesionsSynovial plicae of the knee joint: the role of advanced MRIComparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating lesions of the knee: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant article)Early Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Novel Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation System in the Knee
P2860
Q27024855-B8C0E4C6-8725-4687-993B-2BFD8CC48966Q33809628-67D0FC33-8361-49D7-9D91-64CF6913888DQ33818564-EFF9AA37-2375-49BA-801E-C108E8D155AAQ33888888-D9BDE884-B57F-41E8-8714-A5EE0AC8A451Q34327849-8995F72E-3F48-4519-B74D-27AA4667149EQ35040328-85CE6524-0432-4CF5-858F-5C067814DA8FQ35154096-32B0534F-1D27-4557-AF04-4F4437ADBE5BQ35940462-54661114-50EF-4BA0-BFFB-A40A43185103Q36059524-280FF91C-1065-451D-B5B5-13A12A2654C1Q36106675-93F3C6CB-86F9-481B-ABD9-F4EC28941914Q36764645-BFE37106-8576-4F56-8C7E-4A76E03977AAQ36823039-DFBC4570-5AFF-4472-93AA-9EBC0B193510Q37090080-D6624D88-5684-4DE3-B01C-81FA5606FB7BQ37195653-38A85F08-BB9F-4475-A374-946252ED8E60Q37248374-252E29F7-5F0C-4AEC-862C-48329C3B05FEQ37602553-5AC9A24D-6118-4F12-977B-958C9E543846Q38674793-4241AA5E-13AA-4C5A-935E-04C8CB1D350DQ38878207-E3C0D504-4ABB-4258-A970-D61DD58C3168Q45118427-A5DC0C6D-86EE-4B26-BC2B-E6B6318325F6Q49797423-37F91190-6EDA-45D9-B858-093F1579BA4DQ53018517-7C886DB8-CC7D-4998-A492-7294996468DBQ53513487-2DB063AC-5917-4126-A32A-E3DED87C5887Q56839501-A83AE442-E7DC-4421-91DA-FDF24C4D781AQ57480788-5B362FAB-A9AB-47B3-8D60-9702EE27FA1DQ57541672-EB75F85F-C003-4B01-9CD7-483B9385DD7DQ57742677-542EEBC8-8776-4773-B1AE-DB7A56EB3EB1Q58704661-E4A180FB-25AB-4F42-AECD-A5FF2CAF142AQ59122809-B7955E15-E2A3-4CF0-96C7-93A55A4C5A7B
P2860
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 21 January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@en
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@en
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@en
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T M ...... r cartilage of the knee joint.
@en
P2093
Arthur A De Smet
Donna G Blankenbaker
Kazuhiko Shinki
Kirkland W Davis
Lee D Kaplan
Richard Kijowski
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2503080822
P407
P577
2009-01-21T00:00:00Z