Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review.
about
Henoch schonlein purpura--a 5-year review and proposed pathwayImplementing improved post-treatment care for cancer survivors in England, with reflections from Australia, Canada and the USAInterventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic reviewPatient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer.The cancer care experiences of gay, lesbian and bisexual patients: A secondary analysis of data from the UK Cancer Patient Experience Survey.PROSPECTIV-a pilot trial of a nurse-led psychoeducational intervention delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialRandomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy.Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physicianA pilot randomised controlled trial of personalised care after treatment for prostate cancer (TOPCAT-P): nurse-led holistic-needs assessment and individualised psychoeducational intervention: study protocolTrans-sectoral care in patients with colorectal cancer: Protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center trial Supportive Cancer Care Networkers (SCAN)Establishing nurse-led active surveillance for men with localised prostate cancer: development and formative evaluation of a model of care in the ProtecT trial.Best practice in nurse-led chemotherapy review: a position statement from the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing SocietyViews of breast and colorectal cancer survivors on their routine follow-up care.Breast cancer survivorship symptom management: current perspective and future development.Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review.Effects of nurse-led telephone follow-up for discharged patients treated with chemotherapy.Non-medical prescribing of chemotherapy: engaging stakeholders to maximise success?Nurse-led telephone interventions for people with cardiac disease: a review of the research literature.Nursing's role in cancer pain management.Twelve myths about systematic reviews for health system policymaking rebutted.The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients: what is known and what is needed.The role of a nurse specialist in a modern lung-cancer service.A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol.Total caseload of a colorectal surgical unit: baseline measurement and identification of areas for efficiency gains.Assessing patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led follow-up for women with breast cancer - have relevant and sensitive evaluation measures been used?Cancer survivors' preference for follow-up care providers: a cross-sectional study from the population-based PROFILES-registry.Review of guidance on recurrence risk management for general practitioners in breast cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma guidelines.Can a trained non-physician provider perform transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies as effectively as an experienced urologist?Comparing the costs of three prostate cancer follow-up strategies: a cost minimisation analysis.Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study.The benefits to nurse-led telephone follow-up for prostate cancer.What gets highly cited in JAN? Can editors pick which articles will contribute to a journal's impact factor?Behavioural cancer risk factors in women diagnosed with primary breast cancer.Evidence-based recommendations on care for breast cancer survivors for primary care providers: a review of evidence-based breast cancer guidelines.Coping, social support and information in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A 2-year retrospective cohort study.Long-term follow-up of women with breast cancer: rationale for policy change.Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.Transitional experiences in patients following intracranial aneurysm rupture.
P2860
Q21134918-6D75C091-E348-4B87-8D98-B56C9E4E0F3BQ26830186-798F7F01-E40B-4F75-9A9D-B404E2A28649Q28067650-E1A52682-CCDB-4FF2-BE9C-6D3572B5A4B9Q30982195-FE0759E5-BA98-4F11-935D-A8174ED3BB72Q31166578-167B4F9D-ECD6-4CE7-B37B-D23BA5ADC84CQ33691464-46FAA7E3-D181-4A13-AC56-7FC02D6013C3Q34850808-5B52A009-F7F3-4E91-9E39-B4B830E553D8Q35733935-99A9D006-9B72-4974-9F3B-E1AEF7F7204EQ35803168-627BF876-FE40-41E1-B2A2-AB79FD20CCF2Q35875582-9C9BA7F7-A7F7-4F95-89D1-0CE6A1CD84EDQ36081080-C60A0989-53CA-4E99-8EDB-30203148D2B0Q36146819-B8B59EB9-59E5-43A7-B00E-3D4BEA0B328AQ36416207-CD38A759-2732-4498-82E6-990AA2640672Q36956837-CC337350-EF66-4787-9772-6277B55BEDF4Q37241794-AF926EBF-CE66-4216-B107-B5AF0EBA45E7Q37241798-A4FE5016-91CD-4AED-B7DE-9492B0061B4EQ37440739-558EC4EE-839A-4843-8836-A7E77D1FCF81Q37708973-52F46108-EB7A-4FDB-AF9E-44CB7959581AQ37728346-BA6D33AE-20D4-4FC7-B87F-DF93F97754D9Q37871440-759BAEA9-83D4-450C-8A6C-8025C273BB9BQ38080042-07CF623F-877B-4414-B8EF-6A7C51849D2AQ38089301-98A25E64-6589-46EF-A11E-BB15F2360515Q38119429-424F4918-153E-45E4-90BD-278DA98B59F0Q38365822-98D30685-BB8D-4117-88E6-F194030F4423Q38651259-2AD208CD-84CA-46C5-A3EA-91C0DA4BFBC7Q38775869-950A3FA7-8532-4DC0-8A21-BBA8383C76FBQ38834907-1CBC7810-81E9-4EA0-999A-ADC5920ED8D7Q39031744-E9C52076-27D4-4693-88D6-25726789E1ACQ39138624-540DF9F5-DCBF-4038-829F-3610AB5C48C7Q40043581-772C4136-DD98-4E10-B029-82B1A47EB0C6Q40657322-27FEA3DB-67B6-4C10-BCF6-978D669D2F2EQ41952867-0A3DB61E-3E1F-4BCC-9D35-B457EBA2F48FQ42876400-7115EA44-C5F9-4076-A45F-467FEB90B27EQ45231470-BED4CBBF-0993-44AC-866D-741DB35C15C2Q45784584-92F0CCF7-418C-4BD7-AC1F-1C7B103B9D64Q47138992-7C7A7D6E-A900-4A4C-9574-F19BAAC04D97Q47560631-716EAAFF-377F-483E-B696-A1897AA9E9A5Q48064122-143D6A2B-ACC9-40ED-8349-A80DD6970F1AQ50219621-F143095E-212B-4820-818C-656C458FDA96Q50487203-4175E2E4-7B52-4840-8B95-18A8C320B9CF
P2860
Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on April 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@en
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@en
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@en
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
Nurse-led vs. conventional phy ...... ith cancer: systematic review.
@en
P2093
Barbara France
Clare Wilkinson
Daphne Russell
David Weller
Ian Russell
Nicholas S A Stuart
Richard D Neal
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2648.2008.04927.X
P407
P577
2009-04-01T00:00:00Z