U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
about
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchersHow do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective.Informed consent for MRI and fMRI research: analysis of a sample of Canadian consent documents.The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power.Ethical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.Reviewing HIV-Related Research in Emerging Economies: The Role of Government Reviewing Agencies.A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital.Principal investigator views of the IRB systemA Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care HospitalInstitutional review boards: what's old? What's new? What needs to change?Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.An ethics safe harbor for international genomics research?Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research.Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.The research ethics committee is not the enemy: oversight of community-based participatory research.What women who use drugs have to say about ethical research: findings of an exploratory qualitative study.Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.A multicenter study of the awareness and attitudes of Egyptian faculty towards research ethics: a pilot study.Assessing social risks prior to commencement of a clinical trial: due diligence or ethical inflation?A modest proposal.Differences and structural weaknesses of institutional mechanisms for health research ethics: Burkina Faso, Palestine, Peru, and Democratic Republic of the Congo.
P2860
Q28742470-4FAF88B0-4121-4D6C-99D0-94E65E671F0EQ33326159-D1B04A8C-941C-4FB3-A543-B5314817BBA3Q33645906-4E58CCAE-1603-4F1E-805D-1C4A38E28CC2Q33793530-EC77FD17-0E22-4D22-A9A4-FA68BF4825FBQ34103352-49C77409-A3DF-495B-BFC8-86C54940E776Q34985255-BD554C61-D4CD-4F43-A0E4-33D29F8D2C99Q35589584-F237F0B3-3952-42D8-945A-CA1772FAEDABQ36490902-E9D79F71-C38B-4EC9-ABBF-D9844F35FAB3Q36529031-06A7F484-DB72-4987-A798-CBCB087F0723Q37352991-A5F2DD48-26B5-4214-AE2E-5C106A5DFBBFQ37527871-E021956A-E4BE-43EB-AD60-B964566F4FC7Q37668959-B2C38939-6038-42B0-ACB2-4CE2F2620382Q37690269-231EC39E-1AE3-43A3-AD27-FBA4ACA4AC67Q37710543-FE34B51C-2A5B-4DD1-AE24-1FFDAC767613Q37766901-42942C4B-9988-4E91-863C-80215B1A5AE9Q37816430-E4D97051-EDFB-4423-833A-BCF5199A83D1Q37974104-359F0459-C910-475C-819F-36364619C431Q38031050-B966DB9D-B976-487B-A497-F0775C39F0BBQ39118767-31F0AAFD-B3B7-4994-954F-6FF97BEFF780Q43250756-13A84C21-4D91-4FB2-8BCC-5001A80E5858Q48964197-0056429F-A0F5-4DE1-8C98-0BAB33932E2DQ55450828-71CDA0ED-2084-4954-A49E-C0839B8223BC
P2860
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on June 2006
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@en
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@nl
type
label
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@en
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@nl
prefLabel
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@en
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
@en
P2093
Kathryn Moss
Scott Burris
P2860
P356
10.1525/JER.2006.1.2.39
P577
2006-06-01T00:00:00Z