Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
about
Evolution of surgical therapy for Stanford acute type A aortic dissectionNorth American trial results at 1 year with the Sorin Freedom SOLO pericardial aortic valve.Current Clinical Evidence on Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Sutureless Aortic Bioprostheses.Mechanical versus biological aortic valve replacement strategies.First ex vivo and preliminary sheep model results of the new TRIBIO aortic valve bioprosthesis in small aortic annuli.The COMMENCE trial: 2-year outcomes with an aortic bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue†.Stent and leaflet stresses in a 26-mm first-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve.Durability of prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Ten-year results of aortic valve replacement with first-generation Mitroflow bioprosthesis: is early degeneration a structural or a technical issue?Anticoagulation versus antiplatelet or no therapy in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.Iranian homograft heart valves: assessment of durability and late outcome.Opening-closing pattern of four pericardial prostheses: results from an in vitro study of leaflet kinematics.Characterization of immunogenic Neu5Gc in bioprosthetic heart valves.Long-Term Outcomes and Durability of the Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis.[TAVI in Germany. What have we learned from current studies?].Calcification and Oxidative Modifications Are Associated With Progressive Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction.Failed TAVI in TAVI Implantation: TAVI Dislocation Followed by Ensuing Surgical Graft Resection.A mechanical heart valve is the best choiceStructural valve deterioration in the Mitroflow biological heart valve prosthesis.Stent and Leaflet Stresses in 29-mm Second-Generation Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve.Aortic valve replacement after bypass surgery: surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter (TAVR).Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate and low risk patients-clinical evidence.Mitral valve replacement with the novel TRIBIO and an established stented bioprosthesis in a sheep model.Pathology of balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.Freedom Solo® versus Trifecta® bioprostheses: clinical and haemodynamic evaluation after propensity score matching.Twenty-year experience with stentless biological aortic valve and root replacement: informing patients of risks and benefits.Limited root repair in acute type A aortic dissection is safe but results in increased risk of reoperation.Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular InManagement of failing bioprosthesis in elderly patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular InImpact of sinuses of Valsalva on prosthesis durability in patients undergoing ascending aorta and aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a propensity score-based study.[Surgical treatment of aortic valve stenosis].The Fluid Dynamical Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Prosthesis.Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.Complementary Role of the Computed Biomodelling through Finite Element Analysis and Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis
P2860
Q26738734-EFDD6629-31B2-4003-A70A-3AD0202A800AQ33423076-79052698-B763-444C-A719-7765D8C50C5BQ36685635-1AB17886-8F31-4333-92E9-C502C28D89E1Q38672242-C86DF60C-1365-491C-BC26-7A0CD13DBC5EQ38715370-80CA4822-07E6-4BA6-B279-B427D15990E4Q38729903-A6E1A2DF-B7E5-418E-B40C-03785889EEA7Q38767917-2F0C85F4-6DAB-4811-9AD6-0AEF4FC8144FQ38800247-C7C67127-1C20-47B4-9D0B-58A26BBAE587Q38826615-527E97BF-896B-49B9-9A1E-AA18A3003B23Q38917311-177DD501-3476-4434-9EDC-2D69474E95DAQ38968272-B26AAC35-0F68-418E-AAB8-BF5305788008Q39233254-825A69B7-64D2-4FD7-812E-24A060E1AAADQ39511919-3779D8D7-AC21-4142-BEDB-FD16B8262921Q39733220-FEE5E1A6-5651-44FB-95F2-937CA7812232Q40545748-381B8CAD-536A-45A0-A9D7-F80EBD2E3142Q40845408-96E09035-09C0-4E94-988F-1B075859817BQ40934722-29BBC802-27FB-4382-81AC-65F11A843479Q41104481-3157D122-6ABA-4B4E-9635-3483DD310AC5Q41827515-8C0451F1-C863-4BC1-9A8B-BD1736719950Q42168328-9C419AC3-6E92-44E2-828E-49A52B26430BQ42696805-B06F3E0D-C12D-4C41-85FF-AA2B3A2B181EQ46959398-9B7A43FD-83C3-40DA-AC33-CC7E2C74A683Q47099810-F312E12C-0097-42B3-A4A8-0FD3FA33B631Q47135178-F547B596-967C-443E-B8A1-8D22186BAA52Q47576602-F052C76B-6DD2-41C8-A4F8-41AB202DD322Q48346021-57C25BC3-7022-46A9-878D-A65B103965BAQ49916631-77294162-A593-44C4-A045-A588BA3F0982Q50084270-603F2C4D-CB5B-47F6-8E2B-13ABFE869BEFQ50084944-4366D2D3-0907-4228-A0AF-4D0E824BF918Q50094191-E2E0E02B-710D-4AD3-B6F5-377E907CAB03Q50199895-924639F2-9B04-4377-8042-BE2C29F24F3CQ50220521-1BFA1A9E-CBFD-4221-A76F-A61BDC28623CQ51610616-9DA59169-FF65-4513-91C5-48701691D0F6Q53477659-CDA37190-48F8-4C35-9E5C-F739D3B437D4Q55040043-AAC59C8F-061B-4391-AB91-ECCCCFE3BB3EQ55347050-4B3FD0C1-4C1E-4D0E-B15B-B87AA7A70EBDQ58698154-3A1AC620-810C-4AEF-A8C1-77A97E28416D
P2860
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 04 February 2015
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
@en
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.
@nl
type
label
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
@en
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.
@nl
prefLabel
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
@en
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
@en
P2093
Bruce W Lytle
Douglas R Johnston
Edward G Soltesz
Eric E Roselli
Eugene H Blackstone
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran
Joseph F Sabik
Lars G Svensson
Nakul Vakil
Nicholas G Smedira
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2014.10.070
P407
P577
2015-02-04T00:00:00Z