about
DNA-PK-dependent RPA2 hyperphosphorylation facilitates DNA repair and suppresses sister chromatid exchangeThe HARP-like domain-containing protein AH2/ZRANB3 binds to PCNA and participates in cellular response to replication stressPosttranslational marks control architectural and functional plasticity of the nuclear pore complex basketRole of the Polymerase ϵ sub-unit DPB2 in DNA replication, cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response in Arabidopsis.Rad53-Mediated Regulation of Rrm3 and Pif1 DNA Helicases Contributes to Prevention of Aberrant Fork Transitions under Replication Stress.Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.(Ubi)quitin' the h2bit: recent insights into the roles of H2B ubiquitylation in DNA replication and transcriptionTim/Timeless, a member of the replication fork protection complex, operates with the Warsaw breakage syndrome DNA helicase DDX11 in the same fork recovery pathwaySensing of replication stress and Mec1 activation act through two independent pathways involving the 9-1-1 complex and DNA polymerase εValproate inhibits MAP kinase signalling and cell cycle progression in S. cerevisiaeThe subunits of the S-phase checkpoint complex Mrc1/Tof1/Csm3: dynamics and interdependence.ATR-p53 restricts homologous recombination in response to replicative stress but does not limit DNA interstrand crosslink repair in lung cancer cells.HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication.Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response.Fusion of nearby inverted repeats by a replication-based mechanism leads to formation of dicentric and acentric chromosomes that cause genome instability in budding yeast.Mechanistic and biological aspects of helicase action on damaged DNA.Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switchSrs2: the "Odd-Job Man" in DNA repair.The DNA damage response pathway contributes to the stability of chromosome III derivatives lacking efficient replicators.The role of the DNA damage response in zebrafish and cellular models of Diamond Blackfan anemia.The DNA damage response kinases DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) Are stimulated by bulky adduct-containing DNA.Quantitative proteomic analysis of chromatin reveals that Ctf18 acts in the DNA replication checkpoint.DNA damage during G2 phase does not affect cell cycle progression of the green alga Scenedesmus quadricaudaFunctional characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Chl1 reveals the role of sister chromatid cohesion in the maintenance of spindle length during S-phase arrestHuman pluripotent stem cells have a novel mismatch repair-dependent damage response.More forks on the road to replication stress recoveryBrc1-dependent recovery from replication stress.DNA damage detected with gammaH2AX in endometrioid adenocarcinoma cell lines.Replication fork stalling and checkpoint activation by a PKD1 locus mirror repeat polypurine-polypyrimidine (Pu-Py) tract.Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeRescue from replication stress during mitosis.Suppression of allelic recombination and aneuploidy by cohesin is independent of Chk1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Survival of the replication checkpoint deficient cells requires MUS81-RAD52 function.Genetic analysis of the Replication Protein A large subunit family in Arabidopsis reveals unique and overlapping roles in DNA repair, meiosis and DNA replication.The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicansH2B mono-ubiquitylation facilitates fork stalling and recovery during replication stress by coordinating Rad53 activation and chromatin assembly.The novel chemical entity YTR107 inhibits recruitment of nucleophosmin to sites of DNA damage, suppressing repair of DNA double-strand breaks and enhancing radiosensitizationR-loop-mediated genomic instability is caused by impairment of replication fork progressionExo1 phosphorylation status controls the hydroxyurea sensitivity of cells lacking the Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerases delta and zetaChromatin remodeling factors Isw2 and Ino80 regulate checkpoint activity and chromatin structure in S phase.
P2860
Q24311527-6200D53E-BCD1-435D-A6EB-40B9EE2F09EDQ24338440-D05C914A-365B-4BAF-BE3C-FAD72DCB412FQ27309089-809916A9-6AD3-4BE0-80A3-E73ED38EA5D1Q27323204-A2A0E0ED-C436-40EF-8292-167F87D4D303Q27930928-628D6150-905B-4CBB-8A67-19002279A0D1Q27933812-51BFDE55-6825-4927-9374-8F3ACD0BFA74Q28081868-973535D3-71E1-4093-8825-F9FD55671777Q28114770-EFD306E0-E08B-4CD9-A3F4-7315044EE296Q28477442-26AAD0FD-17B2-40CF-B59F-0B11A8E27EC8Q28821030-B1E6DDCB-4A8E-4BBC-B904-022E5B215056Q30596955-AFD44659-F342-419F-8E18-44A2C1891223Q31029673-0F251A07-66A0-4AC8-9131-23A023E1C112Q33510863-1D4C9877-E92B-4F2D-8C12-B1BC4F8E810FQ33511423-74ADFB9E-3736-48B5-87F1-285ED861760FQ33565837-E8D133E9-CA69-448C-861E-DF314F31F9EDQ33614603-C7862968-D802-45D7-A002-9509EA8ADDD2Q33750098-AE6B0232-F7E6-4EE4-9BCD-2714FC5C1C56Q33754225-0BB3B7BB-E961-4C3A-A101-449443E72802Q33769550-89DF306E-70B1-481E-903B-DCB3771010C7Q33814261-2B03FA0D-DE63-4F4E-A504-F3DB9D06428AQ33870839-8A9DA6DA-47BF-4108-9418-17BA981DAC19Q33877191-84A257F8-E67B-4090-8FDB-8E629E70BDA0Q33908422-2EC1C2B4-6141-4647-A98E-C87EC9804EB8Q34029275-15D9A0C9-25A3-44B1-8B43-FBC5F2E1F620Q34107260-7F218716-2624-420C-A5DE-237CE2B47638Q34161464-EBE67E60-19F8-4E89-A8CA-503A71165945Q34172453-7BAD8C63-AFFB-400A-9783-D6F68F3D1CBAQ34275075-8809CFEF-E9BE-4E8E-BD50-54542456C9CDQ34370538-5956AA12-AF34-420F-AECE-0DB9AA327D8AQ34411080-8035C121-DCCD-4E2B-830B-3C3A5A6AE3F2Q34550677-89CD7BD1-8CDE-48C6-B192-0FD91BEC198FQ34797361-60862F8A-4B6D-4DD3-A457-D73C66E59CB2Q35034362-18DD77C4-9840-408C-BDA5-59B0C9DDEAC1Q35066354-C8B422BC-2F4F-4084-BC90-68DDD19E9504Q35078627-DE1A1264-C560-4E71-8411-0FC68F527C64Q35294605-D51C158C-3EAF-4DF9-BDDB-B8EDF0FF3606Q35376477-64095AF0-A064-499F-9ED2-553CE94A2F8FQ35393287-7A849F93-2827-4C7B-8AB0-06809C21AEDBQ35564759-0C155A9F-23ED-48E1-BB23-1AD76EF3A4F9Q35564807-2512A65F-2002-4931-8714-BBB502A7F13D
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 23 May 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@en
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@nl
type
label
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@en
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@nl
prefLabel
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@en
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@nl
P1433
P1476
The checkpoint response to replication stress.
@en
P304
P356
10.1016/J.DNAREP.2009.04.014
P577
2009-05-23T00:00:00Z