A systematic comparison reveals substantial differences in chromosomal versus episomal encoding of enhancer activity.
about
Using GWAS to identify novel therapeutic targets for osteoporosis.Systematic dissection of genomic features determining transcription factor binding and enhancer function.Predicting gene expression in massively parallel reporter assays: A comparative study.Nuclear Receptor Function through Genomics: Lessons from the Glucocorticoid Receptor.Recent advances in high-throughput approaches to dissect enhancer functionGenome Informatics 2016.OCT4 and SOX2 Work as Transcriptional Activators in Reprogramming Human Fibroblasts.Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue.CRISPR-Cas9-mediated functional dissection of 3'-UTRs.Functional assessment of human enhancer activities using whole-genome STARR-sequencing.Cis-regulatory landscapes of four cell types of the retina.Local sequence features that influence AP-1 cis-regulatory activity.Role of the CRISPR system in controlling gene transcription and monitoring cell fate (Review).Modern methods for laboratory diversification of biomolecules.Resolving systematic errors in widely used enhancer activity assays in human cells.The degree of enhancer or promoter activity is reflected by the levels and directionality of eRNA transcription.Nanog Expression in Embryonic Stem Cells - An Ideal Model System to Dissect Enhancer Function.Orphan CpG islands define a novel class of highly active enhancers.Assessing sufficiency and necessity of enhancer activities for gene expression and the mechanisms of transcription activation.Functional Dissection of the Enhancer Repertoire in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
P2860
Q30275429-8F194B89-1089-4E97-A49E-85A02A334610Q37658966-4499F216-8BA3-4551-BAC4-2A039AE2CEA1Q38755095-F142B124-5DB3-42CC-87D3-E67CE412B4E2Q39299559-BFE6BE4C-F610-429A-8D73-445A95E24EECQ39424726-BB8E2F8F-CEDD-462B-9ED4-E8CAF4D5C9C3Q42330129-53F80E99-F0D0-4652-8648-A614EF4736DBQ42380373-E51AC3DB-6901-49FD-BF8F-8F9798713A9FQ45945774-0831259F-31D2-4E68-8E00-7F3A18BF019DQ46067907-AE0A473C-F508-4BFB-95A2-902498229B0BQ47105936-7E0104AB-D572-4AFE-8EDD-CDB9ED6A1A43Q47153384-24BEBA5F-037A-43F9-90C3-1A7B9311BCBEQ47203571-13A5DC37-8FC3-484B-B40D-60CAD021CD17Q47235195-432A7D82-0C2E-478D-81B9-1DF8617A68D4Q47387337-B54E8AC5-D766-452A-9D64-6FB6C2D9C47CQ48095641-5B7DB28D-4427-41D2-B0FF-E9FE9284B71EQ48148100-0324FB35-F51C-4987-AC0D-F455FEC962B7Q49606480-274E2EF7-33D0-4D68-A1FA-45600D90C8D9Q51032114-6B3009B7-6DF7-4ED4-8B2A-9E9D9F3A95ABQ52430543-6143F43F-8F28-44D4-906B-6B7C3A58EDF2Q57340009-F7387751-3024-4B0B-89A4-F7BCC14AE4FE
P2860
A systematic comparison reveals substantial differences in chromosomal versus episomal encoding of enhancer activity.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@en
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@nl
type
label
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@en
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@nl
prefLabel
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@en
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity.
@nl
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
A systematic comparison reveal ...... encoding of enhancer activity
@en
P2860
P356
10.1101/GR.212092.116
P50
P577
2016-11-09T00:00:00Z