The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
about
Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?Maternal and Pediatric Health Outcomes in relation to Gestational Vitamin D SufficiencyVitamin D, Essential Minerals, and Toxic Elements: Exploring Interactions between Nutrients and Toxicants in Clinical MedicineWhat are the functional outcomes of right hemisphere stroke patients with or without hemi-inattention complications? A critical narrative review and suggestions for further researchTen simple rules for writing a literature reviewWhat is the evidence for the use of acupuncture as an intervention for symptom management in cancer supportive and palliative care: an integrative overview of reviews.A narrative synthesis of illustrative evidence on effects of capitation payment for primary care: lessons for Ghana and other low/middle-income countriesVitamins K1 and K2: The Emerging Group of Vitamins Required for Human HealthToxicant exposure and bioaccumulation: a common and potentially reversible cause of cognitive dysfunction and dementiaA compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.Elimination of persistent toxicants from the human body.Physiatric approaches to pain management in osteoarthritis: a review of the evidence of effectiveness.Psychological resilience in sport performers: a review of stressors and protective factors.Approach to patients with unexplained multimorbidity with sensitivities.The chemical disruption of human metabolism.The Importance of Magnesium in Clinical Healthcare.Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.Why Are Medical Education Literature Reviews So Hard to Do?
P2860
Q24288768-CBE314A4-70D4-4057-9E72-2A5433FA1F7CQ26771924-1179D1C6-CBA9-4FA8-9B53-4A34B64D7981Q26783001-4C3E97C5-0D47-4593-9B0A-7B7BD6B0A663Q28081171-3A503BA9-A867-4C72-B80B-F7FB41DF1869Q28677036-EFBB3F80-2223-4614-BC3D-A581B6BEEF91Q33685474-589BA717-3038-49A1-A467-A407D1DEEA52Q33725440-55D6A476-3D67-471D-8A90-9F18D4180226Q33862379-AEDDD864-F4D5-42CE-8F2B-5E3A0EA8499BQ35101951-6BE3A6BA-8574-4056-ADED-59C5A824D947Q36472916-AD7FC7A2-8601-4340-AFA8-A6498E48CF8AQ37733171-5ACA924E-5B97-47A0-B91E-32633CFD78ECQ38197222-A0BC8589-C813-4FFE-BFB0-797B369EFC10Q38203315-7660254B-0130-44DB-8B04-C672283C6A84Q38219953-1A664D09-8CBD-4DDE-8D31-8F13F509D7BFQ39264905-7F44AB53-C5D9-41AF-8E4D-C35BD7047556Q43131557-9506776D-5864-4C8F-83DE-C0829B56356BQ49932679-8AB4E436-FC03-4BB9-B01A-7003006D367AQ58595583-A9C0C76C-0222-4F1A-8AD0-D0DFC0F925EC
P2860
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on May 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@en
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@nl
type
label
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@en
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@nl
prefLabel
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@en
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@nl
P1476
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
@en
P2093
Marcel P J M Dijkers
Task Force on Systematic Reviews and Guidelines
P304
P356
10.1097/PHM.0B013E31819C59C6
P577
2009-05-01T00:00:00Z