Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
about
Diffusion-weighted imaging outside the brain: Consensus statement from an ISMRM-sponsored workshopDynamic properties of water in breast pathology depend on the histological compounds: distinguishing tissue malignancy by water diffusion coefficientsFunctional magnetic resonance: biomarkers of response in breast cancerCombined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.Can diffusion tensor anisotropy indices assist in breast cancer detection?Diffusion-weighted MRI of breast lesions: a prospective clinical investigation of the quantitative imaging biomarker characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy.High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3TBI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications: prediction of lymph node metastasis of breast cancerHeterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Tumours and the Surrounding Stroma for Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Status in Breast CancerDiffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted mr imaging in breast cancer: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image qualityConspicuity of breast lesions at different b values on diffusion-weighted imagingCharacterization of breast tumors using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.Investigation of the optimal b-value to detect breast tumors with diffusion weighted imaging by 1.5-T MRI.Preoperative axillary staging with 3.0-T breast MRI: clinical value of diffusion imaging and apparent diffusion coefficientTracking the mammary architectural features and detecting breast cancer with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imagingDiffusion-weighted MRI: influence of intravoxel fat signal and breast density on breast tumor conspicuity and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics.Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of InterestDiffusion-weighted imaging: Effects of intravascular contrast agents on apparent diffusion coefficient measures of breast malignancies at 3 Tesla.In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Malignant Breast MassesPrediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent-free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer.Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma.Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations.Extramammary findings on breast MRI: prevalence and imaging characteristics favoring malignancy detection: a retrospective analysis.Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.Apparent diffusion coefficient value in invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla: is it correlated with prognostic factors?Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications.Effects of magnetic field strength and b value on the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative breast diffusion-weighted MRI.MR scanner systems should be adequately characterized in diffusion-MRI of the breast.Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions: a systematic review.Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 Tesla.Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters.
P2860
Q28079278-848A3E48-E0B4-4324-B8FB-928C1D8B434AQ30420673-DB9E00C3-E87D-4788-B912-3D6C518757D9Q30474460-67EAA3A3-BDD2-41F9-BCEA-9CAB24C91F80Q30600800-5D9479E8-4696-4FCE-BF1F-17EE9655F376Q31080716-AF25571C-6D2F-4504-81A4-7A2BB9DEFE1EQ31123171-3A77E932-4D2D-406F-9F4F-8B4709DBDA54Q33584054-AE6FDFA5-14CD-476B-87F3-F9509C19478FQ33728272-3A726F61-3D5F-405B-8D99-2D2AA052EB97Q33767081-2BC26398-D1E2-4E10-B952-A817DCDA9924Q33823280-C618EBD6-E97D-4C12-8C9A-A4662519CB31Q33929267-171D7275-BD51-4D3A-954A-C26FF17C7CB4Q34361556-4C3465FD-D65C-457E-9A77-CA9F46792388Q34536031-6880B41D-B965-4130-941E-BE3CCD3560EAQ35016225-851EFBA6-8BF4-44C2-B24F-6E90C4A107ADQ35093223-70D25ED6-ED79-452C-91D1-EFB60077303AQ35231495-A3F777D9-C78A-4019-893E-B54358ADF1A0Q35415191-65512794-DBC2-444D-B435-4FDAFFE9552DQ35420827-E2D2B62E-78DD-4385-93D3-C4CEFABBAD4EQ35447075-F8521BE7-7F4E-4611-9E71-421A2345BFC9Q35746750-ABC7AB50-E738-4EE4-8E32-DEA984418F52Q35803454-7B0CE4C0-181A-426A-B492-CC7FA292B85AQ35880477-CE74A343-AD1C-4287-9A19-07CA7138981AQ35896750-B42C1756-5BDF-4458-A3EF-6EE4E754F11DQ36241769-B2AC9B78-0E2C-47B7-975C-F1353DF8FE66Q36268031-BAC85293-B5F5-42DC-BA5B-DA3E1A3D8B92Q36395910-88882AF8-162F-4374-A25B-9993D847C2F8Q36407355-60192EAB-DCBC-4112-9A39-0EF2D4CF51ADQ36653229-F6D5B346-F91C-47CD-8411-40394E07F43CQ36672737-0C083452-C525-4F60-B840-170BAF6A7EA0Q36689284-7FCF2A93-D38F-48FA-8725-726EBDEDE8AFQ36820461-31521181-A479-4DA4-B5A9-675E5EE3B589Q36827898-53E0CB5F-5CB4-4304-8473-05E891B13B01Q36839178-921C5D51-44F3-4C4E-8EDF-808134A0E33CQ37087591-75BB3926-5ED3-4F65-850F-CEAD4CF4C464Q37227304-30A93942-3799-4433-8FA1-1305D34CDF79Q37525357-D63B1ABB-5FD8-42A8-9050-0418E966C766Q37764168-DF93EF83-674B-4FC3-8CF5-91208BC806AEQ38018542-85B7123C-C292-4D28-9CA2-C6E75419B1DFQ38092798-22829959-4E9C-48C1-AE0E-9961314088FBQ38103204-748C07A2-930B-40AD-A15D-E44672EC4ABA
P2860
Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 31 July 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@en
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@nl
type
label
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@en
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@nl
prefLabel
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@en
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Diffusion-weighted MR for diff ...... on protocols affect diagnosis?
@en
P2093
Andreas Stadlbauer
Ewald Moser
Günther Grabner
Katja Pinker
Michael Weber
Siegfried Trattnig
Stephan Gruber
Thomas H Helbich
Wolfgang Bogner
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2532081718
P407
P577
2009-07-31T00:00:00Z