Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
about
Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography PracticesBreast cancer screening in developing countries.Reflections on screening mammography and the early detection of breast cancer: A Countercurrents SeriesOverdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation.Investigating young women's motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional studyConditions for Valid Empirical Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis in Randomized Trials and Population StudiesRecognizing the Limitations of Cancer Overdiagnosis Studies: A First Step Towards Overcoming Them.Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?More misinformation on breast cancer screening.An open letter to panels that are deciding guidelines for breast cancer screening.Missteps in Current Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis.Breast cancer screening in Brazil. Barriers related to the health system.Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality.Evaluation of T1/T2 ratios in a pilot study as a potential biomarker of biopsy: proven benign and malignant breast lesions in correlation with histopathological disease stage.The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate.The 20-year effort to reduce access to mammography screening: historical facts dispute a commentary in Cancer.Quantifying Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Methodology.
P2860
Q26785575-7E9B3764-98CA-4527-A536-55E7B3A17B7AQ33592686-53E08C0B-9690-442E-A6BE-4D53EAEAB82DQ34305881-F9C34FFB-2741-4D1A-A05B-D270B66DB940Q35438645-611F49DA-3A2D-48DE-9598-D7C96E16F93EQ36317338-9D62F20E-C4BF-4612-8102-87ABCD3093EFQ37096178-21E3AC53-832C-4523-BC02-3E4C56945867Q37353833-DDECD391-B09B-42AD-BC29-AA29F4F1C73AQ37589078-23A23D89-785A-40A3-A90B-C339D3A5D072Q37626915-BF5B70D5-99DA-4DA0-8249-3503393CC58BQ38418876-7B4E8262-C8E8-4704-BA45-2466C39114C5Q39022692-0BA8D2DE-C405-4C16-A468-8B2F8832F4CCQ39445645-5BA9E5CB-1F35-4A7F-97B1-27809C9AF218Q40327425-E744F95B-1836-43EA-8827-B03D4E8C0C95Q41609293-7D5312FB-2ACB-416A-8A83-2F168D97F818Q41701590-9AB380C1-0283-47FD-B598-032700DE3E08Q45825533-2A163CE5-F3F1-4053-BD77-3E79320BFA16Q47631573-86662431-1EE8-4F87-A02C-D1982483D5CA
P2860
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on February 2014
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@en
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@nl
type
label
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@en
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@nl
prefLabel
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@en
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.
@en
P2093
Daniel B Kopans
P2860
P304
P356
10.1634/THEONCOLOGIST.2013-0184
P577
2014-02-01T00:00:00Z