United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.
about
A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back painMultidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back painSpinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back painCost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic reviewCost-effectiveness of complementary therapies in the United kingdom-a systematic reviewOsteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Invasive and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Low Back Pain: a Systematic Literature Review.Designing a 'NHS friendly' complementary therapy service: a qualitative case study.The societal costs of low back pain: data published between 2001 and 2007.Can Mapping Algorithms Based on Raw Scores Overestimate QALYs Gained by Treatment? A Comparison of Mappings Between the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the EQ-5D-3L Based on Raw and Differenced Score Data.A comparison of manual therapy and active rehabilitation in the treatment of non specific low back pain with particular reference to a patient's Linton & Hallden psychological screening score: a pilot studyHandling uncertainty in economic evaluations of patient level data: a review of the use of Bayesian methods to inform health technology assessments.Cost analysis related to dose-response of spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence.Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain: economic evaluation.A randomised controlled trial of acupuncture care for persistent low back pain: cost effectiveness analysisCost-effectiveness of general practice care for low back pain: a systematic review.Use of fallacious arguments, Ad Hominem attacks, and biased 'expert opinions' can make CBP research 'appear flawed'.Clinicians' perceptions of reporting methods for back pain trials: a qualitative study.Chiropractic treatment as a primary care intervention for better musculoskeletal health in the aging population in the United kingdom: an opinion and positioning paperLow back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual careAre complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disordersCost effectiveness of complementary treatments in the United Kingdom: systematic review.Exploring the cost-utility of stratified primary care management for low back pain compared with current best practice within risk-defined subgroups.A replication of the study 'Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review'.Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores?An indication of current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractic and osteopathy: a cross-sectional studyPhysiotherapy in Malawi - a step in the right direction.Cost-effectiveness of interventions based on physical exercise in the treatment of various diseases: a systematic literature review.Physiotherapy-provided operant conditioning in the management of low back pain disability: A systematic review.Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity: arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain.Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America.Prevalence of chronic spinal pain and identification of associated factors in a sample of the population of São Paulo, Brazil: cross-sectional study.Limitations of acceptability curves for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis.Physiotherapy for neck and back pain.Flawed trials, flawed analysis: why CBP should avoid rating itself.United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: is manipulation the most cost effective addition to "best care"?United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: manipulation alone costs more than other options so why is it recommended?
P2860
Q21285137-5F45D719-6B51-4E2C-BA12-1C869FF33AA9Q24193855-9C82A61E-1857-4988-A0F8-1ECCCAB12C0EQ24234110-9C0CB4EC-6864-4945-9DC2-87C6697313C0Q24635908-F7C9488F-77B3-41B1-AD3C-E69DD5ED1013Q24673356-16E9A8BB-8D3A-42F2-BCB8-F376EF8D6D88Q24813470-F3842454-EA68-474D-93E5-9E0954034008Q30248347-4953EF10-EEB0-4861-AB44-E31B950EAD27Q30847210-D18B6C75-B64A-4F21-8D58-31279E5FA9CCQ31137445-49110E87-1F3C-4B12-9502-EBD4A79988FAQ31153438-59BCCC64-657C-4CF9-B027-A817EB0F06E6Q33304696-CCE50ED2-9DA9-4E01-8DDE-B4ECB7852958Q33511681-F48E4672-D544-44F1-9A71-C6521CACDF21Q33893177-5AF35B8F-2810-4169-8FF2-80B7B893D21EQ34370054-B0FDD4A7-BEAD-4A95-B4AC-D3957F725668Q34617694-53B16923-6680-46E7-94C1-E7C9864A3692Q34901218-98966860-B9B7-46B2-9955-6A60BE77B883Q35040575-312A4772-74EC-4016-8680-6C28105E9C4EQ35223175-09290946-03C7-43C8-A24D-D72B1D0E4B3EQ35729271-7376C200-3951-4EE3-935E-B121482C51FFQ35788679-78E88840-B736-4E02-A0DD-FBF8141CD07AQ35878645-20E0BBAF-37BD-4307-B79A-EBAA7BC6DC6BQ36128864-798CBF09-07BE-4708-9145-269ECF194184Q36220093-DBB2E8A8-BB72-4D92-8E56-77671CEAC09AQ36266814-2CCA8B54-9142-4EAA-BE33-962FAACF8D75Q36285623-C24F5F90-1B22-4B15-B107-E957DF840FE4Q36302236-58E85456-673B-4138-8AC4-B692205A27B4Q36411574-6F2EC2E9-063C-4843-9236-4477FFE67DE1Q36798538-AA3B915E-4425-471E-8BD2-0976202EA92CQ37383519-0031BAAD-946A-4E42-AFEF-AB75E10F05ACQ37385401-8DACF822-1A5B-4273-850A-B96F0AF47058Q37618989-FDC0B275-8316-4CDF-AC20-656F1BF14B42Q37716748-A006CB56-A167-4C79-A0F2-194A285A133EQ37908104-D4B66833-6546-422C-B3A5-85365E7BB2FBQ38588284-DECD2841-AED8-416C-86B8-A5AC439A619DQ39143461-734A7601-0FDE-4ADE-81D2-F57A6EE16727Q40226939-373F9B57-4D1E-4F25-8DFE-4EF3C1C2FE99Q42714566-7E7F9D90-627D-41B5-A613-70CE59A46FAAQ42875092-EC7F3D7F-0BEB-42E8-9081-4598AFE3A1D8Q42974915-B38BA98D-5DC8-4792-9F9A-C59E5C187486Q42974932-E8358A40-1F08-4664-BD29-BE6CBA09CA67
P2860
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
United Kingdom back pain exerc ...... for back pain in primary care.
@en
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation
@nl
type
label
United Kingdom back pain exerc ...... for back pain in primary care.
@en
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation
@nl
prefLabel
United Kingdom back pain exerc ...... for back pain in primary care.
@en
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
United Kingdom back pain exerc ...... for back pain in primary care.
@en
P2093
UK BEAM Trial Team
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.38282.607859.AE
P407
P577
2004-11-19T00:00:00Z