Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
about
Making the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores meaningful at the patient level through normative scoring and registry data.Development and Initial Validation of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) for Measurement of Recovery from Musculoskeletal TraumaDevelopment of an item list to assess the forgotten joint concept in shoulder patientsDoes knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study.Can The EQ-5D Detect Meaningful Change? A Systematic Review.Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry.Knee awareness and functionality after simultaneous bilateral vs unilateral total knee arthroplastyPatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome differs with different outcome scores: A randomized, double-blind study of 129 knees with 3 years of follow-up.Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 following total hip arthroplasty.Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplastyPatient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers.Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee?Intraarticular Administration of Tranexamic Acid Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case-control Study.Joint awareness in posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee: validation of the forgotten joint score in long term condition after tibial plateau fracture.What makes patients aware of their artificial knee joint?Depressed patients feel more pain in the short term after total knee arthroplasty.Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement.Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score has higher responsiveness and lower ceiling effect than Knee Society Function Score after total knee arthroplasty.Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?Physical activity after outpatient surgery and enhanced recovery for total knee arthroplasty.No difference in joint awareness after mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: The HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT.It is merely subjective opinion that patient-reported outcome measures are not objective tools.[Total knee arthroplasty in 2014 : Results, expectations, and complications].Forgotten Joint Score - Portuguese translation and cultural adaptation of the instrument of evaluation for hip and knee arthroplasties.
P2860
Q30989982-52C7E5DD-F762-418A-9937-B878D871B70BQ34329717-91194FBF-CE7B-40C0-9168-3CE782840BF6Q35218937-9043C9E1-9292-44F8-BCBF-7051FB5E1EEEQ35977332-BD9846B7-4DA3-4D6C-A2D4-58504DB34FB3Q36172364-84872655-BD07-44BE-B542-9E0C98EA8C77Q36295838-571A6F66-D201-48FC-866F-3221FBF1D9F4Q36693647-B87FAF82-E1DD-4F62-901A-6CF9853983EBQ36740781-6A520978-74DF-4783-B2A0-C2F20A9D6796Q36857038-AB3B1A5C-5006-4D0C-B583-0615DF863BFBQ36987061-108377DE-09BB-46B8-9BCC-7B5FCB0E6FACQ38573721-F46AF8F7-82A6-41EF-9511-08E18C52993AQ40134493-748488AE-77E0-4B6B-AF58-1EF5F87AC560Q40232384-A400BABD-E862-40E6-A671-366BF295BAABQ41979242-E0B947BF-E44C-4159-AAEE-F4EBEC13159DQ47097450-BC6654CB-8927-4EC5-B9D2-94E2AFE03F0FQ47556720-BE10EEAA-B5A4-442A-AAA0-0681729E08E2Q47838143-BCFD9D71-4059-4550-B739-A58ABD62C6C0Q48054469-617F2649-9453-40EA-A891-052166D4C255Q48059209-576BE950-D29F-4DF0-9AE8-54BDE2E01A18Q48100736-7E8EE037-F2CB-4C32-B70A-469720800023Q48126870-1D4D53B6-5BFC-4368-B437-E4E8B6E7365CQ48254514-5124D357-68B4-4E86-8CB1-34D188600646Q48332528-86C5977C-06F9-4521-8D6D-9D1E6BC51EB3Q50046166-34197907-105B-46AE-8B48-78926242D497Q53550637-924CE3F2-B36B-4155-BF4B-CEE4B0738BE4Q55296125-4F7659D0-ACC5-4557-B46E-FA3E12F8E9BB
P2860
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@en
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@nl
type
label
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@en
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@en
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty
@en
P2093
J M Giesinger
K Giesinger
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JOCA.2013.11.001
P577
2013-11-18T00:00:00Z