International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.
about
Gigapixel surface imaging of radical prostatectomy specimens for comprehensive detection of cancer-positive surgical margins using structured illumination microscopyLoss of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 in prostate cancer is linked to an aggressive cancer phenotype, high tumor cell proliferation and predicts early metastatic and biochemical relapsePositive resection margins may not reflect the true margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomyStaging of prostate cancer.Concern for overtreatment using the AUA/ASTRO guideline on adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomyEffects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens.High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens.Dataset for reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization.Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study.Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomyVariation between specialist uropatholgists in reporting extraprostatic extension after radical prostatectomy.Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.Syndecan-1 (CD138) contributes to prostate cancer progression by stabilizing tumour-initiating cells.Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.Evolution and oncological outcomes of a contemporary radical prostatectomy practice in a UK regional tertiary referral centre.Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy.Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.Do positive surgical margins predict biochemical recurrence in all patients without adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy?Prediction of pathological and oncological outcomes based on extended prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer receiving radical prostatectomy: a single institution study.18F-MK-9470 PET imaging of the type 1 cannabinoid receptor in prostate carcinoma: a pilot study.Controversial predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a study from a Latin American (Brazilian) institution.Combined handling of prostate base/bladder neck and seminal vesicles in radical prostatectomy specimens: our approach with the whole mount technique.Extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostatic carcinoma: is its proximity to the surgical margin or Gleason score important?Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Margin status of the vas deferens in radical prostatectomy specimens: relevant or waste of time?Mucinous adenocarcinoma of prostate and prostatic adenocarcinoma with mucinous components: a clinicopathological analysis of 143 cases.Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.Loss of AZGP1 as a Superior Predictor of Relapse in Margin-Positive Localized Prostate Cancer.PanCD44 Immunohistochemical Evaluation in Prostatectomies from Patients with Adenocarcinoma.Q57133489Re-evaluating the concept of “dominant/index tumor nodule” in multifocal prostate cancerOnkologische und funktionelle Ergebnisse der offenen intrafaszialen radikalen Prostatektomie
P2860
Q27345080-9E899FE6-E679-4BBF-8E03-1A28E51A1F96Q28540624-B8E16F2C-C772-4A3A-990A-3680962C9156Q34293280-85E2526A-11E8-44F1-A1D4-B58CD764EE66Q34634756-6C80D572-1CF8-42BF-B40E-D1D4944F969FQ35141139-19A5BADB-6524-4807-B24C-41A2F07BF240Q35856413-0001376E-C2BB-4142-8F96-F06881E1C981Q37944906-AF041BE6-91AB-4AD0-A764-7BE1608714D7Q37972701-35771518-D51E-45AE-9AB2-13EE615101AFQ38067446-C2E81130-5776-44AF-9F9F-C17E07ABCBD2Q38089328-E02F61BE-F551-470E-BA6B-218E6F5A8D6AQ38125826-3EABAFF2-9572-43B5-88FB-859E0D0EFD18Q38151295-86AE5714-B155-4AEF-AFFB-824BD3B8FE95Q38266018-5389D005-5038-461E-809E-AC5BAFFFC131Q38384899-9F4704C6-0CBA-412C-B9CC-4D97BDD0F279Q38750075-2392AAFC-383D-4C09-B211-E76F7B171782Q38785318-05A68D97-A44C-4564-ABF3-7EEF618E8BACQ38807889-A1CE8170-95FB-4DA8-88CA-0ADB75667A4FQ39022839-6978BC6C-DC71-4F7E-9488-A5F759874ADCQ39326545-30BA3105-DA09-4972-9FA3-A133EC531BA8Q39813696-02C769B5-E9D3-48FC-AC47-67F5BBD6A627Q39823876-D82B8394-C39D-4338-B748-13254066628BQ40574917-7C518411-6427-43AE-B292-74D1FBC50759Q40686291-75273A93-AE25-4C31-8EBB-37413B6B5A21Q42109368-9811A7DA-1566-4DD1-A712-D33539734A81Q42326796-0C1E63DD-2699-4EE2-A00B-765A33A84E5CQ42564268-5C813B7E-B4E0-41E2-BC86-BAE2F64732AEQ44536250-F75E1A21-1241-4120-9685-682A52458B01Q45036398-D0575061-CA59-4999-9CCC-61CDB8D84E85Q45750299-61BA8EAD-03F2-4A3F-942E-81801D2AF487Q45879396-A5B0BE04-D275-45DC-8BAB-29A5B0923BBFQ46517275-881DC3EE-33B0-487F-AFA4-730924FD4099Q47288076-6EEFF28B-615B-4350-A954-F4766F841365Q48524997-D9B6C5F9-9C3A-491C-8843-5CC9F2D8707AQ49210490-0D369F9F-5084-41DD-B412-23370A389C4DQ51606266-7150CE33-3394-4C1D-A3BF-7F53C43215C7Q55280786-22BA9DE3-9E1A-47D1-9110-4E93A8197296Q57133489-E1BEDFCD-F6F1-49B6-A0BC-DC5EEF541685Q57385804-4C425A3C-0D48-45BD-85F2-3D7FA0353954Q57920403-27705954-B83A-42A0-BC52-C0A6E7F042C8
P2860
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 20 August 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
International Society of Urolo ...... ing group 5: surgical margins.
@en
type
label
International Society of Urolo ...... ing group 5: surgical margins.
@en
prefLabel
International Society of Urolo ...... ing group 5: surgical margins.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
International Society of Urolo ...... ing group 5: surgical margins.
@en
P2093
Brett Delahunt
David Griffiths
ISUP Prostate Cancer Group
John R Srigley
Jonathan I Epstein
Liang Cheng
Peter A Humphrey
Puay Hoon Tan
Theodore H van der Kwast
Thomas M Wheeler
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.155
P577
2010-08-20T00:00:00Z