Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
about
Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.Research and primary evaluation of an automatic fusion method for multisource tooth crown data.3D Evaluation of Palatal Rugae in Identical TwinsStable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews.Optimal parameters for final position of teeth in space closure in case of a missing upper lateral incisorAccuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans.Records needed for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a systematic review.A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study.Validity and reliability of a three-dimensional dental cast simulator for arch dimension measurements.Reliability of measurements made on scanned cast models using the 3 Shape R 700 scannerIntra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review.Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machineAccuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence.Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography imagesLight emitting diode mediated photobiomodulation therapy improves orthodontic tooth movement and miniscrew stability: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface AnalysisAccuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.3D evaluation of palatal rugae for human identification using digital study models.Creation of 3D multi-body orthodontic models by using independent imaging sensors.Evaluation of digital dental models obtained from dental cone-beam computed tomography scan of alginate impressionsBonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental castsEvaluation of the intercanine distance in newborns with cleft lip and palate using 3D digital casts.A Comparative Evaluation of Mixed Dentition Analysis on Reliability of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Compared to Plaster ModelDigital Three-Dimensional Automation of the Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.Integration of digital dental casts in cone-beam computed tomography scans.Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models.Digital 3D image of bimaxillary casts connected by a vestibular scan.The Assessment of Digital Study Models Using the GOSLON Yardstick Index.Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment.Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?Orthodontic scanners: what's available?Multibracket appliance: impression defaults and their reduction by blocking-out - a three-dimensional study.Rating dental arch relationships and palatal morphology with the EUROCRAN index on three different formats of dental casts in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners.Analysis of the dentoalveolar effects of slow and rapid maxillary expansion in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a randomized clinical trial.Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment.Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
P2860
Q30315816-BC109EA0-C317-43D1-8D5F-34BBEE9C2075Q31170439-2EA47DDD-A90E-467E-B3EC-5FAFC84B654CQ33762365-1964992C-1830-4D91-889B-199F9E314264Q33860381-4F535E03-BD85-4F5A-B60D-7581A0E52FD5Q34577592-F424804C-4686-4F0C-BC83-C06EA06D2F27Q34634704-C2720345-79AB-4B39-95EA-0BCB585491F7Q35050240-5A8AACA2-025C-4A0C-80E9-4898ECDB9B70Q35199038-64DEF1DB-298E-4C3D-8BAB-DA3432EBCFC6Q35263801-46294BD7-5F8F-4644-B624-41F1D937319BQ35534014-93E6A8A8-671E-4E8C-BD91-3F6264AF18EDQ35555086-160950B9-93C1-4CDA-A171-0C2C95912143Q35560275-A0ED79CC-9A04-44F2-9E4D-9C3E4DB7892AQ35569153-31DF99AE-EBEA-4711-9D8F-E21C37CF0606Q35572013-0407D958-260D-4141-880D-02CB2D1D66FDQ35815515-A706ED58-EFAC-4E6E-A4EA-B303CB0CDF90Q35923963-116A5374-45EC-4B9B-B7FC-202380792EF3Q35978273-99AF560D-E2D9-4966-ACC7-41ABD0FC3791Q36053113-1061586E-5C1B-42F6-9B7B-3F9B7AD6A44BQ36329672-CFB65363-F13C-4ECC-A7DC-7745261764CBQ36466649-FA7691BA-8F32-4312-AABD-83897670E477Q36830281-D03D20B1-0489-4E79-9E96-4262FF1F30D7Q36933206-82886020-3C85-4D8B-BF39-BADCE383F116Q37023523-E2647192-A973-49A3-AA6C-0B790A426E84Q37437780-369DA3E7-B144-4CBF-BCCF-70228E580802Q38372042-27AE2AB6-056D-458B-994A-F46DD918F398Q39803476-F31655D5-5E7B-4A82-BAED-EE5090D103B3Q40067832-56F15646-92A3-4F93-A1D9-9498F2D70DD8Q40114356-622BAC66-95A4-4E48-BCD4-86CC6C8BE1F6Q40120659-04BC0F0B-32C9-498E-9797-D1968C38C7C0Q40135050-1A5924A0-C718-4963-9BC4-DCAA320499A9Q40197826-2E0482CF-4217-4E44-946D-E2A96329A501Q40256818-861C6550-DBD3-4640-BBD0-EDE2ACA0F323Q40277586-7AA527CA-DE74-488C-B0D7-DCDFA4B1F349Q40290582-21F07E90-2AB7-4E7D-85B4-F71EE63E2D69Q40321766-523C9E4D-2FE3-4200-BD7A-D7F1F0AAC358Q40325594-147F28F3-C753-4BF0-A3F7-530004474F83Q40334399-E39325FF-AA1D-47E9-828D-93894905E119Q40396787-BB76FB2D-0CFD-4B07-94E5-BA528B9F2BE6Q40434308-A1CAFA18-32E5-4D41-B2FB-94F5796019D4Q40457522-1A06147B-0366-4058-A705-506208A09535
P2860
Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@en
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@en
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@en
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Orthodontic measurements on di ...... r models: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P356
10.1111/J.1601-6343.2010.01503.X
P577
2010-11-22T00:00:00Z