Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.
about
The lack of paid sick leave as a barrier to cancer screening and medical care-seeking: results from the National Health Interview SurveyA novel approach to determining violence risk in schizophrenia: developing a stepped strategy in 13,806 discharged patientsA focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit allProstate specific antigen testing in family practice: a cross sectional survey of self-reported rates of and reasons for testing participation and risk disclosureNon- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance.Screening for prostate cancer: the debate continuesExploring cancer screening in the context of unmet mental health needs: a participatory pilot study.A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who?Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis schemeAssociation between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer riskLung cancer screening: a review of available data and current guidelines.Patient and Provider Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: How Does CT Colonography Compare to Other Modalities?Survival of endometrial cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: a period analysis by age, histology, and stage.Role of tumour molecular and pathology features to estimate colorectal cancer risk for first-degree relatives.Optimization of Network Topology in Computer-Aided Detection Schemes Using Phased Searching with NEAT in a Time-Scaled FrameworkSerum peptidome patterns of colorectal cancer based on magnetic bead separation and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysisAssociation of PSMA4 polymorphisms with lung cancer susceptibility and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in a Chinese Han population.The association of type and number of chronic diseases with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.Mechanisms of Gefitinib-mediated reversal of tamoxifen resistance in MCF-7 breast cancer cells by inducing ERα re-expression.Identification alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein precursor and tubulin beta chain as serology diagnosis biomarker of colorectal cancer.Colon cancer-specific antigen-2 may be used as a detecting and prognostic marker in colorectal cancer: a preliminary observationKnowledge of Saudi female university students regarding cervical cancer and acceptance of the human papilloma virus vaccine.Case-controlled identification of colorectal cancer based on proteomic profiles and the potential for screening.The relationship between perceived burden of chronic conditions and colorectal cancer screening among Appalachian residents.Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United StatesReligion, fatalism, and cancer control: a qualitative study among Hispanic Catholics.The American Cancer Society and the American Health Care System.Predictive performance of prostate cancer risk in Chinese men using 33 reported prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs.Knowledge, attitude, and behavior among Saudis toward cancer preventive practice.Rectal Cancer Diagnosed after Cesarean Section in Which High Microsatellite Instability Indicated the Presence of Lynch Syndrome.Early detection of breast cancer using total biochemical analysis of peripheral blood components: a preliminary studyOpportunities for the primary prevention of colorectal cancer in the United StatesA new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.Optical Imaging: Future Tool in Detection of Pre-cancerous and Cancerous Lesions of Cervix and Its Comparison to Colposcopy.Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.Gene-expression patterns in peripheral blood classify familial breast cancer susceptibility.Improving the performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method.An overview of prevention and early detection of cervical cancers
P2860
Q28388260-72D0F993-9F89-4881-BBA1-4EFF689D33CCQ28480881-C05DC8DC-4D86-469D-95E3-5D37DF5823BDQ30541811-F8547532-5390-4290-A3A2-9A5FCB55B6C2Q33642527-C279DD0A-C7D0-4D56-91B5-DC6035A7BEFDQ33713251-9CB94025-B9E7-43EA-9F84-33765E48B75DQ33739374-F91F7F5C-7C79-4EA5-9647-DD346B18DD85Q33885776-8A43058D-1ECB-4AB7-942B-F8C9D665D85DQ33921754-74DE7E23-586C-44E3-B939-D99444BCD69DQ33929863-3E8A2D4D-1AF2-4E4D-93A0-1BB3B680DDE1Q33959412-1202202B-C4E0-4E77-9F8B-1D5C2969D6CEQ33988820-5DF7F6D6-9E5C-4552-B87A-48274A19DD49Q34053289-B9056A6B-08DA-4D3D-AC64-D7120D2879A3Q34067949-FA28D893-E4D6-47C1-B758-8816E48B2D0CQ34193853-30A35150-EBA3-46E1-B010-8A8F9F277CB3Q34212950-1934BFCF-10A9-4F7D-94F7-91F32F0C9E66Q34266707-119810A4-5DA9-4551-906E-500FA1BA326CQ34434827-D30434C7-7FB0-4C2D-8D31-E32DB68925BBQ34454987-CA7335E6-4014-4A3B-AA11-FCA28B9ED04EQ34465945-2AE2FAFD-D7F2-42A1-B25E-9CD69506D3C9Q34755647-80FE73C0-40F5-46B6-923A-694C4BAC1527Q35040890-2262B87D-5FB5-4AF6-BD55-9BE39BE67609Q35117340-EC3E121C-24E8-4B8A-8D4B-76214F20218CQ35141868-011089EC-6CC4-465D-AF75-DC2103EE0553Q35183549-24C72245-D2BA-4617-AFD1-0E80D2580115Q35268860-4E16BDDE-6BEB-4939-AFF8-DF6489B2F78DQ35535543-20660B94-44F6-4763-87E1-69F4A84C39EEQ35536993-B2719C07-D654-48C4-AB35-0EFA2953C6BBQ35582114-381FD253-7E0B-41C7-82B9-CE8F7305429CQ35584621-02DEAE3D-BB59-4358-96F6-4B7FB1A0202BQ35597195-0213803A-7E8A-4321-B17A-FD3AA5E59B03Q35610936-31A28A7C-A5B2-48B3-8009-2055CC76C81AQ35630565-979FBAC8-E0D9-4532-AD27-CBE8FDEF20C1Q35632112-06991FF4-3263-42D7-AB15-3F1C8FF7D44AQ35656135-636D655E-5D40-40B5-926D-60AA0DF10443Q35694337-F816F0A9-DE6B-40D3-91F8-81A7D68CC52BQ35729647-6D4CC0DE-5ED8-4AD8-B1E3-5427C7F8D7BFQ35742550-C0D9E05A-7B2D-4A7C-AD33-1C88F742B732Q35832873-C333752B-7EA4-4557-B313-1FF9F1ED7505Q35848240-C4B1EEAC-9C8F-4300-8767-44C21BE96EBAQ35929647-237A5D7D-D6DD-4B85-870D-22141D7F3022
P2860
Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 04 January 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
type
label
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
prefLabel
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Cancer screening in the United ...... nd issues in cancer screening.
@en
P2093
Debbie Saslow
Durado Brooks
Otis W Brawley
Robert A Smith
Vilma Cokkinides
P2860
P356
10.3322/CAAC.20096
P407
P577
2011-01-04T00:00:00Z