Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
about
Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruismMoral judgment as information processing: an integrative reviewImaging deductive reasoning and the new paradigmLifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming SurveyQuestions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoningYoung Children Detect and Avoid Logically Inconsistent Sources: The Importance of Communicative Context and Executive FunctionRationality: a social-epistemology perspectiveWhy do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory.The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system.On-line social interactions and executive functions.Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants.Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.Lay Evaluation of Financial Experts: The Action Advice Effect and Confirmation Bias.The role of metacognition in human social interactions.Conscious thought does not guide moment-to-moment actions-it serves social and cultural functions."Because I am worth it": a theoretical framework and empirical review of a justification-based account of self-regulation failure.Toward a cultural-historical perspective on the selection task.The Selfish Goal: autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behavior.Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.Independent effects of relevance and arousal on deductive reasoning.Preadolescents Solve Natural Syllogisms Proficiently.Culture, Truth, and Science After Lacan.Distinguishing Intrapsychic From Interpersonal Motives in Psychological Theory and Research.The role of conviction and narrative in decision-making under radical uncertainty.Questioning the preparatory function of counterfactual thinking.The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach.Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making.Normativity, interpretation, and Bayesian models.Development and necessary norms of reasoning.The influence of power and reason on young Maya children's endorsement of testimony."The Intelligence of Nations": Smart but not Wise-A Comment on Hunt (2012).The SPOT effect: People spontaneously prefer their own theories.Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building.Brains don't predict; they trial actions.Metacognition and reasoning.The empirical study of norms is just what we are missing.Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem argumentsCore Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God.Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse.
P2860
Q24289258-1971C73B-8F46-4293-BD0E-67434D4ACCF8Q28084464-4DAEEB33-C162-4212-B817-7531819C415AQ28649319-4DA34664-307B-4D51-B265-AE823E8655F4Q29040085-B382903C-7466-4F76-948F-5C2476CF05C6Q29998897-39941299-2D68-4E78-9E35-A7DA1AA3DE6DQ30276560-F82E327B-519C-4ACF-88F4-9A3CD3A9A751Q30364350-785D96AB-380A-49CC-B6EE-AB0284ECAFEDQ30397670-7BDEC6AD-BF69-427D-815D-D231C6453FC5Q30414743-A3D1231A-C41D-43B4-B95F-86D711DB667EQ35876342-5D8B7126-C8DF-4846-965A-137FA2727C6BQ36037876-641760DE-BC9A-4CC4-B844-35F361B75973Q36873946-AB67FCDC-AD29-4018-B7F3-460DF1C1C430Q37284727-8D3801C9-6565-4FA0-999A-F87E7AD5FFACQ38021768-6240A4CC-6EFA-479F-B858-ED3D45D393DAQ38125190-7A39BC67-7206-4B74-81D3-60A2D7961376Q38161445-605FB32F-A7FF-4135-BC25-0EE1F8E94A16Q38180397-46531AB2-3B32-471B-82AF-C453965B24C9Q38207774-722C7598-0031-4A0D-8701-AF3183321E2AQ38223712-BBA4A2DA-108C-4B4B-9F13-DC85EEF65D16Q38392942-F52BBC80-C063-4437-9CFF-77AF350DDA00Q38394639-D955977D-BA5D-4033-AA23-73190782AB09Q38399154-305D8707-5E1D-409C-A595-0AFEEDFB092AQ38547745-579FC00E-1724-4549-B9EF-514119365553Q38643182-9C0D7CBD-AFA3-4501-8CF8-D6125787BE0BQ38808871-0E5D3D07-705A-4132-A5D9-26B1A288E381Q38968228-5B7D452E-37B0-4962-9CED-D3229AEC1846Q39449880-A9DD5FE7-6D50-482C-AF0D-1600343DDCCEQ39488093-F6AEF985-B2CE-4D28-9287-C50B6EAEFD36Q39852406-94E83CD8-FA41-4595-AA53-504E09E335A4Q39924434-E177BCCB-30CF-4A8C-A45E-F08F284A5BCAQ40557571-8FA46764-A328-403D-8E00-951BD3CC46E4Q40739618-58AB90C3-C26E-43D4-B807-598DF82F392DQ40935918-ED3D4F77-D239-4D2E-921C-8AA4490C70D9Q40938941-AFDA956A-31C1-468A-BFED-A4F773F4845CQ41482380-C437DA6B-4898-4E4B-AEA5-8A06A8AA292DQ41993104-7C764252-074E-423F-8749-2CD66B2A0125Q42113840-C4C7EA92-D9BE-42F2-9AC2-EB22F411F0A4Q42231921-688CE949-2672-4956-BD43-088CD13998EBQ46123712-5DA0E9FC-7098-4C15-9CD7-9E3655E74340Q46606910-3D25616B-689C-4D08-A3CD-48FD7DAFF646
P2860
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on April 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@en
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@nl
type
label
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@en
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@nl
prefLabel
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@en
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@nl
P1476
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
@en
P2093
Dan Sperber
Hugo Mercier
P304
57-74; discussion 74-111
P356
10.1017/S0140525X10000968
P407
P50
P577
2011-04-01T00:00:00Z