Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review.
about
New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitationElectrical somatosensory stimulation followed by motor training of the paretic upper limb in acute stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialShould body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?Progress in sensorimotor rehabilitative physical therapy programs for stroke patientsMuscle Recruitment and Coordination following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy with Electrical Stimulation on Children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Is the Frequency in Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation the Key Parameter in Modulating the Corticospinal Excitability of Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients with Spasticity?Influence of lower extremity sensory function on locomotor adaptation following stroke: a review.Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke.Rehabilitation for Individuals With Genetic Degenerative Ataxia: A Systematic Review.Physiological aging impacts the hemispheric balances of resting state primary somatosensory activities.The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on strength, proprioception, balance and mobility in people with stroke: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.Somatosensory stimulation to improve hand and upper limb function after stroke-a systematic review with meta-analyses.A randomized controlled study of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to acquired brain injury.Improving arm function in chronic stroke: a pilot study of sensory amplitude electrical stimulation via glove electrode during task-specific training.
P2860
Q27022621-7484A046-A8E0-4A28-A748-DE42837AEBC8Q29247941-DD47F1A3-2C7B-4086-B354-5470756BC3E6Q33904248-A1F2308F-464E-4B23-BD82-6CAD281C1D22Q34047578-460F902C-C927-4D20-865D-C8DCF1ACA6FCQ35801821-3110FDC9-5A74-4E5D-AB3F-43047ECE4ADFQ36531526-C946186A-5E7D-4F12-BBEF-75DD5BA28762Q38120591-E277D0A5-5073-404E-9EF1-404CE3BE3B45Q39317978-4014C427-D7A8-4D20-9A90-D32BF99EEACFQ39359981-82B6CE06-50D4-4A2C-90F4-D85F6C62521CQ44773501-A3BEF872-6FE8-43B1-BA12-56436EE45507Q46339057-8350D613-D364-4C0C-880E-C969E3BB03B4Q47758556-16012D44-B440-419C-BB9C-ABB592562258Q48382923-F6AFD74A-519F-4C44-96A4-EA89656095C8Q50544620-5B8226C5-93B8-4C4C-AA3D-C4D972C59B1B
P2860
Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 11 July 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@en
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@en
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@en
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Does sensory transcutaneous el ...... a stroke? A systematic review
@en
P2093
Yocheved Laufer
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1545968310397205
P577
2011-07-11T00:00:00Z