Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study

Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37918663

about

Comparing the Overall Result and Interaction in Aggregate Data Meta-Analysis and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study Long-Term Antiplatelet Mono- and Dual Therapies After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Network Meta-Analysis An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis Systematic review and meta-analysis: techniques and a guide for the academic surgeon Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding for cirrhotic patients: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis Efficacy of anti-leishmania therapy in visceral leishmaniasis among HIV infected patients: a systematic review with indirect comparison Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.First-line treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: interpreting efficacy data by network meta-analysis.An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions The relative clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema: an indirect comparison in a systematic review.Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.Indirect estimation of the comparative treatment effect in pharmacogenomic subgroups.The efficacy and safety of different kinds of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a network meta analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials.Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study.The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Comparison of glucose lowering effect of metformin and acarbose in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.Boceprevir and telaprevir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection: an indirect comparison meta-analysis.Extending Treatment Networks in Health Technology Assessment: How Far Should We Go?Crossing the fourth hurdle.Comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis Direct-acting antiviral therapies for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis.Exercise and BMI z-score in overweight and obese children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.Comparative effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: evidence from pair-wise and warfarin-controlled network meta-analyses Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer's checklist Exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis: systematic review incorporating trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis.Overall similarity and consistency assessment scores are not sufficiently accurate for predicting discrepancy between direct and indirect comparison estimates.Adalimumab versus infliximab for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in adult patients naïve to anti-TNF therapy: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction.Using indirect comparisons to compare interventions within a Cochrane review: a tool for comparative effectiveness research.Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.Network Meta-analysis: Users' Guide for Surgeons: Part I - Credibility.Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods.Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane review authors.

P2860

Q26750684-EB014ADE-B374-4E73-AE15-F16011D18024 Q26782126-A793C651-4632-47EC-8217-98B764ABC885 Q26797510-1A32A9CB-C92F-44B8-8430-005DFEFF5E15 Q26827222-F776A8F3-4A97-45E0-894B-2E3DCFA1E84D Q26995442-B245254A-3E39-4BCE-AB1E-CBB97CC08A50 Q26997344-8427D31C-CAFA-46FA-927C-54B285A4E784 Q28291828-1C4A4789-266E-487F-8CBF-D977DF70CC1B Q28487597-C6359679-0BC3-461B-8D0A-F4FC23E0C1C9 Q28677533-004B65A9-A968-45AB-A862-FA7962B3C652 Q30251972-A78D0DD0-0A5E-4CB4-A1D2-424F11C12A6C Q30891802-FEE6A5A6-26C5-40ED-AC76-D0391C5F5232 Q31119372-DE013072-6A76-4C79-9D64-D6F5A0939B53 Q33620679-55F8E2EC-03EA-4058-BFA2-62C0FD1EBBC6 Q34378757-016E621A-2594-4A01-97A2-C3131B750B83 Q34413025-73EBA492-A135-48F6-A9D9-14DF36B5777D Q34981428-4A61430A-2DA8-4A6F-A6A1-8BFDC97DA600 Q35108946-752D5C85-B049-4F17-8426-35837C896AAA Q35266148-12C4B2D1-DA8B-4E3D-B786-6E66C5034DF9 Q35532746-D351861C-1954-4D9F-9BE3-13EA6599FEC9 Q35592932-9D925ABF-C056-4E99-97D2-88667A348DC0 Q35612977-5515D670-583C-42A4-AC1A-FCB51E617A20 Q35839723-BB2B9713-DCDC-4035-8ECA-B1E372F006EC Q36008866-2EF529ED-8CFF-492B-8A02-B42CC122F510 Q36081428-2D421574-AC30-4932-BF10-2D1F88B1A55D Q36317589-1751E376-D7A9-4AB0-9A23-A6FADD645298 Q36487287-E1B93191-F7A0-4BCA-902F-2EB9501E8C80 Q36549805-2E856E15-258F-4925-B09D-29D1521EFFBE Q36819050-A0DDD35D-4356-4866-BFBB-44E6231EDF36 Q36896927-15EBDFF1-F40B-4CCF-9F5A-B8853246481A Q36991730-4A2DBE5C-94A5-4729-B43B-4242FF9792F8 Q37187917-F9B4AAB8-95BB-4BEB-9440-3637121A6BBA Q38063047-C986635B-771E-4243-9974-8BA0959D546B Q38184706-DF35406F-49A7-4703-8E7B-079ABCDE0C09 Q38195122-D34268B4-82E8-4441-BE2F-CE7A3FE4FC9E Q38201284-BC55717D-4402-47AC-B104-4FF72A520CF0 Q38256056-7FB0EF52-A786-4025-9244-A63289ADC3E7 Q38268984-C88FF487-6C97-471A-A258-702DE3A49127 Q38418984-BBCCA285-C0F1-4408-8E6C-AFC9F37F7179 Q38520487-D03BAA93-338A-491F-A7D7-00C8BC2A9BB4 Q38524041-D6B1E567-DDD5-427D-9129-FCD4A81595E3

P2860

Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37918663

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articol științific

@ro

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@gl

artigo científico

@pt

artigo científico

@pt-br

artikel ilmiah

@id

artikull shkencor

@sq

artículo científico

@es

name

Inconsistency between direct a ...... ns: meta-epidemiological study

@en

Inconsistency between direct a ...... s: meta-epidemiological study.

@nl

type

label

Inconsistency between direct a ...... ns: meta-epidemiological study

@en

Inconsistency between direct a ...... s: meta-epidemiological study.

@nl

prefLabel

Inconsistency between direct a ...... ns: meta-epidemiological study

@en

Inconsistency between direct a ...... s: meta-epidemiological study.

@nl

P1433

Q37918663-14B31F07-D1E0-46EB-B75B-4D3290DF4D14

P1476

Q37918663-A48DB165-83E6-4E57-B319-E7C83ABD08E2

P2093

Q37918663-185B0CD6-9661-4777-ADBA-8A05509C55A6

Q37918663-642DFA90-CB5D-4F80-9A6F-8DD852B6E3B1

Q37918663-7047639E-04BB-4E7F-8AA8-F7EF51953327

Q37918663-9E27BA9E-C527-4B47-9BDC-B5F4F5D8A3C2

Q37918663-BA45648C-E6BD-41B8-ADBE-BB84D8BF6416

Q37918663-EB1E7087-790B-4B06-B616-C3C7BB2EDE06

Q37918663-F00FF422-68E5-44D6-80AB-748F5BEFD717

P2860

Q37918663-02C5DB24-D32C-4DD7-B81A-7DD7CC38334D

Q37918663-07DC3DF1-974E-4B82-A465-15DD25A8A297

Q37918663-14851ACA-8555-4250-AA6C-B7A07E54799D

Q37918663-1DE67301-BCA1-444D-9B08-06B1131797A7

Q37918663-29686004-A903-4021-9662-2AAA658A0307

Q37918663-3BA7C7AD-30EB-4CB2-8E79-C9C9CFF54631

Q37918663-45CD8FD9-3E24-4C10-AAB1-04AF25E2C91E

Q37918663-57C25ACB-E39C-4771-B81C-14103ADC2275

Q37918663-5BFBB7E1-F47A-4FA1-B23B-14EDB95E1A9E

Q37918663-61249EAE-4C3F-43D6-98E8-1D6C621A1251

P304

Q37918663-0B6E4BEF-AD14-49E6-AA00-60BB6C9EAECF

P31

Q37918663-DC5B669E-C027-4EC9-BDF3-EE65CD5BAB0B

P356

Q37918663-CFAB5F7C-F8B1-4DE4-BFF6-85E715C01F2E

P407

Q37918663-689FCFFA-8E9C-4493-841E-45988E31A639

P478

Q37918663-C3494507-4F71-444B-94FE-4B4FC9528502

P50

Q37918663-A6472410-9356-4144-978F-F7F999BA9CC8

Q37918663-CCA4AD08-5A72-457E-B048-7066D96194EA

Q37918663-F861467E-33B6-4E61-A021-2B4E0873AE93

Q37918663-FE3849BC-F5BC-4CAF-A3BB-1B70DB1D021F

P577

Q37918663-1B436AA6-064D-4E9D-8344-E401EA897C34

P5875

Q37918663-45E5E077-9078-4A1D-93C6-B428ECB0B26E

P698

Q37918663-50F80C28-C0CB-4C72-A16F-42F79DECF53D

P921

Q37918663-6DCAEC36-BA4D-4A90-8EB8-00158E0D2AD3

P932

Q37918663-775663C7-DFFE-413E-B2C0-1FE447ED6A55

P356

P1433

P1476

Inconsistency between direct a ...... ns: meta-epidemiological study

@en

P2093

Alex J Sutton

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Alison J Eastwood

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Doug G Altman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fujian Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tengbin Xiong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yoon K Loke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Interventions for rosacea

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions

Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons

P304

d4909

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.D4909

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P478

343

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Anne-Marie Glenny

Richard Holland

P577

2011-08-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51576133

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21846695

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

3156578

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string