Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.
about
Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reportingThe development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policyAcceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experimentReturn of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data.Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methodsCommunity Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs--the PAraDOx Study.Identifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia.The effect of out-of-pocket costs and financial rewards in a discrete choice experiment: an application to lifestyle programs.An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in AustraliaThe effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments.Prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia: a conjoint analysisPatients' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.Type 2 diabetes patients' preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experimentPatients' & healthcare professionals' values regarding true- & false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: discrete choice experiment.Patient preferences for reducing toxicities of treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).A survey of patient preferences for oral antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Preferred features of oral treatments and predictors of non-adherence: two web-based choice experiments in multiple sclerosis patients.Patient preferences for attributes of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: development and results of a ratings-based conjoint analysis.The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study.Measuring the Preferences of Homeless Women for Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions: Development of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.Using conjoint analysis to develop a system of scoring policymakers' use of research in policy and program development.Physician preferences for bone metastasis drug therapy in Canada.The relative importance of perceived doctor's attitude on the decision to consult for symptomatic osteoarthritis: a choice-based conjoint analysis study.Evaluating preferences for profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists among injection-naïve type 2 diabetes patients in the UK.Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer TreatmentsExperimental measurement of preferences in health care using best-worst scaling (BWS): theoretical and statistical issues.Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis.Household Size and the Decision to Purchase Health Insurance in Cambodia: Results of a Discrete-Choice Experiment with Scale Adjustment.Patient Preferences for Injectable Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty.Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.Patient, Caregiver, and Nurse Preferences for Treatments for Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors.Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.Evaluating preferences for profiles of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among injection-naive type 2 diabetes patients in Japan.Effect of pill burden on dosing preferences, willingness to pay, and likely adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes.Clinical factors and the decision to transfuse chronic dialysis patientsA test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia.
P2860
Q26772051-1BE1E8ED-557F-4342-A964-F71E48200FB7Q27303852-3A79B25A-34B0-4C8D-B25E-8D8A1FAFDE09Q30365074-0395A025-A4F8-40EC-BD09-3DA33619D23FQ30557139-366DBCBB-3917-4078-B2AF-A90E6E956D66Q30576161-9B7D086E-09D2-4DA0-B8F6-DBF183E7F213Q30870323-0C62D78B-96E9-4EFC-9E36-B5F138AAFBA8Q33695793-597789F1-3726-4AFF-B2EE-DC492C25B4B2Q33911637-5B08D9D4-290E-4F8C-960F-64B216F2989EQ34065382-6F87F316-149C-4DD2-ADE0-1C37C7AADB24Q34130122-22AF3190-23E8-4E6A-A83E-BC33F4C327FDQ34164094-B7C902D4-F840-4260-AEF9-5DD2867AD153Q34417226-76715B43-1FFE-4795-8F7F-DE891EC876C4Q34445812-DD6E796D-6DD1-47EF-A7B3-9CD80F2A4B99Q34461341-5EB2BF92-083D-48E2-B063-65AB997FD582Q34718400-50805893-1F27-4694-92A6-8D263CFD45CEQ35056770-43F0197C-A594-4645-A4E9-16E7956D0DE6Q35069426-72EB754D-4E36-45DD-B9C9-8EC0D728B4C0Q35117875-48E2B9E2-ECAD-42C5-AB79-B6D1C21C249DQ35217938-CCEAA114-4869-480F-80C9-73DBE2B1D4BFQ35223204-059614A5-205B-4967-9A55-A0B6FB676EA6Q35446549-150E2633-CA1F-45D8-89B8-651361F63C2BQ35659835-CA3171A2-C986-49B3-813A-0919D99FE301Q35850521-9DEADF12-1BFD-4080-8D1B-C3FDAAEA79EAQ35910792-5D655D1A-194A-4798-8E8B-142BBCD4AF2DQ36169862-B5CEB703-EAFE-4E38-8D7B-23223DD1D518Q36258875-6C81B256-8DA3-4A3C-B800-FAC3A08E79D2Q36284354-FC372644-558D-42C5-84AF-7F5527FD9BA8Q36366960-1D9B952A-165C-41D6-B3D5-7A2F5EFF29C3Q36515838-E4B21165-0F2E-4859-A1CB-6D95FDE42E6DQ36610799-73A8247B-501B-46CB-A019-66DDE764379BQ36686033-C6362F32-6CDC-4C57-A241-D6BAC31F62E1Q36698871-262FC8C4-1E44-4AAD-9262-23BB94E892C2Q36789973-11EEC7A3-86DF-4379-8F86-19F2093CD2B7Q36937790-F7CD3B15-8FBB-4EE3-BC35-C5F0CB82DFE0Q37048841-86218D5C-2340-437C-B825-6CD5E344EEA2Q37133784-5B110E9D-8B17-4FD3-AE6B-EFA1D6A17E49Q37138351-0C15EEA1-CE62-4E20-BD74-C45BE1982540Q37207116-41423413-233E-4A0B-B7B2-3710D20CA63CQ37280782-1E7188A3-B759-4412-B32D-2E99C8476B37Q37332926-74176AFE-C2EF-42E7-8D08-83C5A04FD247
P2860
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@en
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@nl
type
label
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@en
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@nl
prefLabel
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@en
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Conjoint Analysis Applications ...... erature between 2005 and 2008.
@en
P2093
Brett Hauber
F Reed Johnson
John F P Bridges
Lauren Donnalley
Ruthanne Cameron
P304
P356
10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000
P577
2010-12-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1039139143