Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in implant dentistry. A systematic review on critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance.
about
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trialsClinical trials in allied medical fields: A cross-sectional analysis of World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform.Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.Clinical trials in dentistry in India: Analysis from trial registry.Clinical research in implant dentistry: study design, reporting and outcome measurements: consensus report of Working Group 2 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology.Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants.Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.Dental practitioner recruitment for a randomized clinical trial in the field to evaluate the performance of a new glass ionomer restoration materialNovel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review.Directly Placed Restorative Materials: Review and Network Meta-analysis.A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics.Design and Validity of Randomized Controlled Dental Restorative Trials.Research Reporting Guidelines in Dentistry: A Survey of Editors.Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.Plasma rich in growth factors had limited effect on early bone formation in extraction sockets: Response to "Anitua, E., Alkhraisat, M.H. & Orive, G. (2013) Letter to the Editor: Rigorous methodology is the school of coherent conclusions in science.Five-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing bone-level implants with either submerged or transmucosal healing.An assessment of the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials published in paediatric dentistry journals.Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching - Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review.Implant decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
P2860
Q33857464-E1CD3F91-8F08-49D3-9AD1-733D275E474DQ37012013-E4E04C0F-F201-425E-86EA-3148AC35F207Q37352284-78CC2E08-B5EC-436F-AE1E-BAB7F0B99705Q37741604-6D747A5E-E0C7-4663-A038-FAA6B7C168ACQ38005480-4E960246-2A1D-445B-9D44-8117619AF9B4Q38038875-A6D591DE-AB23-4312-9392-A3A67A26A935Q38096065-9EB550FF-B726-4353-A7DB-C76AA358E7A3Q38254428-C96F7E24-C39B-47DB-9E96-F226EBFB6221Q38339190-E04AED4D-C634-4EC6-8542-B0B03A0EE553Q38502565-253B8AC9-9290-4BAC-8375-E46849E95028Q38749020-E6754388-7576-40FF-8DC8-027B22BFFA3BQ38757218-744031C4-9330-42DD-A960-1F1D0DA4714EQ38868407-2095C292-5CD5-4FDE-8BA8-E7D045B91077Q38903544-2181165B-BC61-4A99-8C29-AB08DC639BCFQ44577342-D5DFB03A-F7D6-4099-AA49-FA07308D9F66Q45245483-83CD395F-948E-4D7A-8464-694A3A3DCA1FQ46377336-61E39B60-EB3A-4901-A61C-A53D8CF0774DQ48185809-CE01B6B9-4043-4D07-9829-BCD583A0CE0BQ49039619-BF7C276C-CCF0-41D8-811A-ED0D250CC2A0Q50120274-8ABACEE5-5097-417A-9076-7E7414F87EE9Q53541895-9B831076-339F-42AA-848E-45D7722589A8
P2860
Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in implant dentistry. A systematic review on critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Quality of reporting of random ...... ssment and clinical relevance.
@en
type
label
Quality of reporting of random ...... ssment and clinical relevance.
@en
prefLabel
Quality of reporting of random ...... ssment and clinical relevance.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Quality of reporting of random ...... ssment and clinical relevance.
@en
P2093
Francesco Cairo
Ignacio Sanz
Michele Nieri
Paula Matesanz
Umberto Pagliaro
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1600-051X.2011.01839.X
P407
P478
39 Suppl 12
P577
2012-02-01T00:00:00Z