The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence.
about
Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectivesFive-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Anything new in its management?Patient reported outcome measures in male incontinence surgeryReconstructive Management Options of Delayed Complications Following Bladder Outlet Surgery.Infrequent Reservoir-Related Complications of Urologic Prosthetics: A Case Series and Literature ReviewA state-of-the-art review on the evolution of urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: past, present and future innovations.Surgical treatment of neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review of quality assessment and surgical outcomes.The use of sling vs sphincter in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.Complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: a meta-analysis.Radical treatment of localised prostate cancer in the elderly.Adjustable perineal male sling using tissue expander as an effective treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.Recent developments in technology for the assessment and management of incontinence.Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Report of the 2015 Consensus Conference.Mechanics of the urethral duct: tissue constitutive formulation and structural modeling for the investigation of lumen occlusion.Artificial urinary sphincter urethral erosions: Temporal patterns, management, and incidence of preventable erosions.The impact of prior urethral sling on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival.The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.Targeting Moderate and Severe Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Adjustable Male Slings and the Perineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Focus on Perioperative Complications and Device Explantations.Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?Outcomes of single- vs double-cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion in low- and high-risk profile male patients with severe stress urinary incontinence.Efficacy and safety of the ZSI375 artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence: lessons learned.Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in octogenarians.Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practice-do we treat a different patient?Treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable transobturator male system: Outcomes of a multi-center Iberian study.Can time to failure predict the faulty component in artificial urinary sphincter device malfunctions?Single perineal incision placement of artificial urinary sphincter with cadaveric correlation of sub-dartos pump placement.Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience.What is the fate of artificial urinary sphincters among men undergoing repetitive bladder cancer treatment?Implantable Systems for Stress Urinary Incontinence.Male urinary incontinence: Artificial sphincter.Long-term outcomes of primary implantation and revisions of artificial urinary sphincter in men with stress urinary incontinence.Transperineal reanastomosis for treatment of highly recurrent anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: extended follow-up.Risk factors for resurgery in men with artificial urinary sphincter: Role of urethral strictures.
P2860
Q26738493-9B3C64AA-4782-4EAF-B7EA-66192782B1DFQ30315011-AE5278D3-E2C6-4981-AE8E-C5CCB43A130CQ33843667-F5D32098-8A46-4B61-98BF-D36EF7CA2068Q35758338-DAE2498C-311F-481A-8135-5FB53FD909BAQ36293434-A5E7151A-7956-49A1-BC13-8BC9CC833F11Q36485548-502EE7D2-85E4-4FAB-B325-3156086C3192Q38220856-54631BBE-C499-4015-9178-405BD7D9D030Q38261260-5CCE911A-E239-44A7-9FE7-A6F7E9536CF3Q38266414-DF78DEE7-53C2-48B6-8240-BFB3A8531826Q38324087-CCD58107-3A2C-4A9C-BFE3-D1283E982FE7Q38391501-7BF49D1A-6A3F-40FD-9374-4E9B0C954147Q38392155-7283C2F4-1E48-4095-B640-B9E4E5F86A73Q38446043-7691E6DF-B8E1-4011-9948-0419EA9EECFFQ38603326-B32DBECD-8DE8-4C1F-9B2A-93C6BE1E0F28Q38804219-A60DEEC7-1F48-45D5-9210-04CF8D515444Q38820271-96DDA860-BC21-4B9F-B397-2F96F27B0013Q38961556-ED30B3DE-803A-4946-992B-BFD5749EEEB1Q39092915-17FAE51B-7D1A-40F3-827C-AD7E951ABFD1Q39350673-A286629D-923B-46C2-AEF5-E4B09DC03D8EQ39406932-AF921EC8-3692-400C-B2F5-7BA1ED18038FQ39601508-598BC8FC-699D-4B52-B1BE-3A937E243FE4Q40148935-A0BE4007-9DB5-4F42-A12D-9400271B33BAQ40356028-3BAE7D0A-D5C9-4B9C-8AA9-6549E34F355BQ40525032-6B156A98-8409-415E-B17B-C7A6AE3D549BQ40776924-C49AD16D-29BF-4A1A-8506-A80690BF8CF9Q40777782-CE09763E-467A-4637-86EA-16620F7ADC2FQ40786510-5109AE3D-4BFA-46AE-B985-A5FAA4B73CFCQ41063830-DEA394B1-670B-4BB0-9856-917DA5E309DCQ44967404-BBAB87C7-276E-4376-B94D-BD0962B14743Q46989856-AB3348FF-00F4-478C-91F9-D25E30E6B326Q47189864-10A59381-5BB5-4F2D-9D92-3E187D3B3ED5Q47311275-767E4EBD-C84A-4535-9670-9B7E38A5070BQ47342384-606C40A9-9B9F-41C9-B13C-AF0832582F61Q47358254-A07B325B-7034-43D5-A493-BE6E8754C48AQ47430786-FA9F891B-54DA-483F-AE66-52E9511015A0Q47578155-028E422C-8E2B-4BD5-B3F3-98454AE37199Q47602138-88FC34C0-CD9F-4F29-B24B-AA436D31D15FQ47996954-97F3CA69-9323-4462-A96A-796AFA90A49EQ48182283-1663456F-3D6A-4FCE-959E-48516D742B7EQ48223964-46DACC95-150D-4464-BF0A-74E8B0F9D449
P2860
The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The artificial urinary sphinct ...... e non-neurogenic incontinence.
@en
type
label
The artificial urinary sphinct ...... e non-neurogenic incontinence.
@en
prefLabel
The artificial urinary sphinct ...... e non-neurogenic incontinence.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
The artificial urinary sphinct ...... e non-neurogenic incontinence.
@en
P2093
Andreas Petrolekas
Frank Van der Aa
George R Kasyan
Jean-Nicolas Cornu
Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group
P304
P356
10.1016/J.EURURO.2012.11.034
P407
P577
2012-11-23T00:00:00Z