The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
about
Changes in shear wave speed pre- and post-induction of labor: a feasibility study.In Vivo Evaluation of Cervical Stiffness Evolution during Induced Ripening Using Shear Wave Elastography, Histology and 2 Photon Excitation Microscopy: Insight from an Animal Model.Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Three-dimensional volumetric gray-scale uterine cervix histogram prediction of days to delivery in full term pregnancy.ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: 2016 update.Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure.Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor.Foetal Doppler Parameters as a Prognostic Marker Before Induction of Labour
P2860
Q30380576-588A880C-9BCD-4259-BEC2-8784D22CD056Q30403229-799F9D02-5B54-43A0-B62A-567E55F6F4CDQ33555057-ED897B6C-7F91-4E7F-98BA-12F1B6E81BABQ34637446-F947247C-0434-4D4A-86BF-F85BA41B4933Q37199994-E4E388E0-12A4-45F5-95AD-06CBC23428FFQ39133241-7C5C426A-44AB-4470-8BFA-A7A524180797Q39359640-4BC8570D-9C68-43DE-8236-A0DF92A08287Q39751344-F9AB13FA-1CB9-4CC7-870E-09E10596784EQ39771239-E1E96971-478F-4405-B9D7-6F6D8469EA86Q46980165-6E5E66FF-C171-4AA9-8507-BB7BB29EDAD3Q47744045-BD1371FA-9950-45DC-B571-72FCF80EFF4BQ50702103-9D3AABA7-6F0F-4FDD-A494-AD608FCB6254Q51678662-61D1A10D-5394-4F1B-BB1F-10957EA88024Q53373507-B3CC4016-FA6A-4843-AEC7-AEB6DAB48C2DQ58741100-DA4F929D-B9A1-4FDB-BF1A-1F895BDCF239
P2860
The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
@en
type
label
The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
Ben Willem J Mol
Brent C Opmeer
Corine J M Verhoeven
Diny G E Kolkman
Eva Pajkrt
Joris A M van der Post
Sophie J Brinkhorst
P304
P356
10.1055/S-0032-1331024
P577
2013-01-02T00:00:00Z