Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
about
Dkk1 haploinsufficiency requires expression of Bmp2 for bone anabolic activityBone Morphogenetic Protein for the Healing of Tibial Fracture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsPhysicochemical and biological characteristics of BMP-2/IGF-1-loaded three-dimensional coaxial electrospun fibrous membranes for bone defect repair.Mechanobiology in the management of mobile atrophic and oligotrophic tibial nonunions.Treatment with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 leads to a transient induction of neutralizing autoantibodies in a subset of patients.Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice.Bone morphogenetic proteins: a powerful osteoinductive compound with non-negligible side effects and limitations.Neoplasia following use of BMPs: is there an increased risk?Orthobiologics in the augmentation of osteoporotic fractures.3D biomimetic artificial bone scaffolds with dual-cytokines spatiotemporal delivery for large weight-bearing bone defect repairComposite Hydrogels for Bone RegenerationInteraction between living bone particles and rhBMP-2 in large segmental defect healing in the rat femur.Non-unions.Core decompression and biotechnologies in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.Comparative study suggests that human bone morphogenetic proteins have no influence on the outcome of operative treatment of aseptic clavicle non-unions.A Multicentric, Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial of Two Different Doses of Expanded hBM-MSCs Plus Biomaterial versus Iliac Crest Autograft, for Bone Healing in Nonunions after Long Bone Fractures: Study Protocol.
P2860
Q35287547-14D9EFB1-2F27-4CED-9333-605B82979CC5Q35824005-DF748277-1C5E-4A31-8731-492941E0FFBCQ36370837-12A02951-F446-4E0F-9E7F-CE2963591274Q36699536-91D53C50-A3CB-41EE-A232-FABA23C05022Q37223201-198AF04D-5FF1-4650-B089-5D081AF86213Q38215317-FC4B30FD-E11D-4A3B-8097-BB2A7858D64DQ38256807-5ABB0DBA-AADD-4A56-9C49-3554D6A8348EQ38256860-1B12FE6C-A2AE-4324-B585-D2D2923EE459Q38272234-0E078116-57C7-4066-93E8-70F9EFA10B00Q38644107-DDA9C421-0588-4EA8-85AB-B7CA95C2E0AFQ38887763-CA8E23FA-332E-451B-B138-4AA45A3B589EQ39870327-4DDE57BE-A9EE-4E16-AE32-9D2A9D30A9A3Q47098086-FDCA9616-078B-4CE6-A5DD-C994D9484736Q51025035-44D484ED-C892-4FDC-9129-46894917886FQ51573861-DA16A5F9-0EF7-474F-859A-163B78F57207Q55063479-4C5F3CC6-10AA-4233-9D69-4B5583E2EA42
P2860
Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
@en
type
label
Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
@en
prefLabel
Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
@en
P1433
P1476
Autograft versus BMPs for the treatment of non-unions: what is the evidence?
@en
P2093
Gerhard Schmidmaier
Taco J Blokhuis
P356
10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70009-3
P478
44 Suppl 1
P577
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z