Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012).
about
Visual Task Demands and the Auditory Mismatch Negativity: An Empirical Study and a Meta-AnalysisAttempted and successful compensation in preclinical and early manifest neurodegeneration - a review of task FMRI studiesStatistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studiesStimulus-Driven Reorienting Impairs Executive Control of Attention: Evidence for a Common Bottleneck in Anterior InsulaPotential reporting bias in fMRI studies of the brain.Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.Attention shifts the language network reflecting paradigm presentation.Two distinct dynamic modes subtend the detection of unexpected sounds.Is playing video games related to cognitive abilities?Homeopathic Arnica from Boiron and post-operative bleeding in mastectomized women in Milan: Statistical flaws and bias to be addressed.The Cultivation of Pure Altruism via Gratitude: A Functional MRI Study of Change with Gratitude Practice.The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Brain Data and the Outcome in Disorders of Consciousness.The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings.Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studiesEstimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rate
P2860
Q24288688-96124A9A-F44B-4F22-848E-B95FC052BFD1Q30862037-4A6C26D7-2C4F-4826-8F41-D5179FB652D3Q30905479-F188B077-6E8F-4F54-9F3C-F0853952925EQ34538121-8747F488-8FC8-4BE2-8ECC-89445715CBAFQ34921995-6445E782-6C38-4FA7-AFAD-A8047B629688Q36666724-BBFC7CD8-9EA4-4541-9594-05701FC91A47Q37338883-6E4A7D5D-3BC2-4673-8315-D520CC400A12Q37520593-3EDEF6F5-AE88-4F77-9601-2A12745C2FC5Q39015829-CE8D7EC5-F7EB-4BE1-AC4E-9B62F16E5534Q47387398-B339EC2F-F851-41AE-A0C7-34BDA5E7C48BQ47548617-F095F304-63EC-45AB-9C32-177B01A95FBFQ48187941-B2041C68-903B-4BEA-8F07-6F3FE05E0922Q55038759-1B06CE48-CC44-4390-A25A-1F789ED4EB8DQ55356134-8AEA4013-D607-4DDC-B290-D987600C3A46Q57144281-B0A2FBF2-937C-4BB4-9CB2-80896D0CAD63Q58744983-C8F23973-3B5B-47B3-9C5E-13D2F52CB02E
P2860
Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012).
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Why small low-powered studies ...... ch: comment on Friston (2012).
@en
type
label
Why small low-powered studies ...... ch: comment on Friston (2012).
@en
prefLabel
Why small low-powered studies ...... ch: comment on Friston (2012).
@en
P1433
P1476
Why small low-powered studies ...... ch: comment on Friston (2012).
@en
P2093
Michael Ingre
P304
P356
10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2013.03.030
P407
P577
2013-04-12T00:00:00Z