Five reasons to use bacteria when assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards and fates.
about
How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered NanomaterialsAssessment of agglomeration, co-sedimentation and trophic transfer of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in a laboratory-scale predator-prey model systemImpact of engineered nanoparticles on the activity, abundance, and diversity of soil microbial communities: a review.Shifts of microbial community structure in soils of a photovoltaic plant observed using tag-encoded pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA.Quantifying the Sensitivity of Soil Microbial Communities to Silver Sulfide Nanoparticles Using Metagenome Sequencing.Separation of Bacteria, Protozoa and Carbon Nanotubes by Density Gradient Centrifugation.Toxicity Testing of Pristine and Aged Silver Nanoparticles in Real Wastewaters Using Bioluminescent Pseudomonas putida.Agglomeration Determines Effects of Carbonaceous Nanomaterials on Soybean Nodulation, Dinitrogen Fixation Potential, and Growth in Soil.Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles on soil nitrification at environmentally relevant concentrations: Lack of classical dose-response relationships.Antimicrobial Activity of Al₂O₃, CuO, Fe₃O₄, and ZnO Nanoparticles in Scope of Their Further Application in Cement-Based Building Materials.The poly-gamma-glutamate of Bacillus subtilis interacts specifically with silver nanoparticles.Iron oxide nanoparticles induced alterations in haematological, biochemical and ionoregulatory responses of an Indian major carp Labeo rohitaLong-term effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of silver nanoparticles on major soil bacterial phyla of a loamy soil
P2860
Q27908490-96E41002-C51F-4C89-A97E-E88371A3CC29Q28385493-4FB5FFF0-86A6-4C50-ADC6-5392496D3179Q28386881-2C4A771E-4E14-4AA4-8CE9-58E8ED382961Q35554370-6741DFE6-0B9C-434F-B908-979CE47A7537Q35875765-64CCC8CE-05AB-4382-9351-3D641CED95C5Q36116993-BB66F8D8-A9F3-4EF1-9666-DEE763F7DC58Q37462357-9042D4F2-7F50-47F3-9253-6787938EC660Q42322317-7FB19710-FC01-4B53-9638-B73D75F78AFEQ44913007-60694DC0-10B9-4B96-9A71-C4BBD3D1D9C9Q47988188-237876B3-2BBC-41AB-9F37-BC799B4634E2Q55265709-C08AAC6F-AEC2-4EE3-AEDA-646C73850C37Q55367056-0212F2A2-62D1-4614-90F1-C365E4AC59A9Q58376669-BCA3E1F4-C09B-48B5-A66E-3235B58F3715Q58780219-A47EFFD5-6947-4A00-8605-6F3B1D03AB26
P2860
Five reasons to use bacteria when assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards and fates.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Five reasons to use bacteria w ...... vironmental hazards and fates.
@en
type
label
Five reasons to use bacteria w ...... vironmental hazards and fates.
@en
prefLabel
Five reasons to use bacteria w ...... vironmental hazards and fates.
@en
P1476
Five reasons to use bacteria w ...... vironmental hazards and fates.
@en
P2093
Patricia A Holden
P356
10.1016/J.COPBIO.2013.11.008
P577
2013-12-15T00:00:00Z