about
The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contextsThe Rural-Urban Difference in Interpersonal Regret.Trusting outgroup, but not ingroup members, requires control: neural and behavioral evidencePreferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritismThe development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas.Hair penalties: the negative influence of Afrocentric hair on ratings of Black women's dominance and professionalism.In Wrong Anticipation - Miscalibrated Beliefs between Germans, Israelis, and Palestinians.Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup InterdependenceGroup bias in cooperative norm enforcement.In-group defense, out-group aggression, and coordination failures in intergroup conflict.Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation.Relationship between Salivary Oxytocin Levels and Generosity in Preschoolers.Expectations and Decisions in the Volunteer's Dilemma: Effects of Social Distance and Social ProjectionIntergroup Biases in Fear-induced AggressionSafety, Threat, and Stress in Intergroup Relations: A Coalitional Index Model.Inter-group cooperation in humans and other animals.A Qualitative Study on Unassisted Smoking Cessation Among Chinese Canadian Immigrants.In intergroup conflict, self-sacrifice is stronger among pro-social individuals, and parochial altruism emerges especially among cognitively taxed individualsSymmetry warrants rational cooperation by co-action in Social Dilemmas.An experiment on individual 'parochial altruism' revealing no connection between individual 'altruism' and individual 'parochialism'.New Frontiers in Heart Rate Variability and Social Coherence Research: Techniques, Technologies, and Implications for Improving Group Dynamics and Outcomes.Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies.The Reputational Consequences of Generalized Trust.Intergroup competition may not be needed for shaping group cooperation and cultural group selection.Functional Interdependence Theory: An Evolutionary Account of Social Situations.Make It Short and Easy: Username Complexity Determines Trustworthiness Above and Beyond Objective Reputation.Pupil Mimicry Correlates With Trust in In-Group Partners With Dilating Pupils.Does being a Stranger make it Difficult to Cooperate?Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support.Reply to De Dreu: Shared partner nationality promotes ingroup favoritism in cooperation.Perceptions of political leaders.Giving decision-makers nondiagnostic person information promotes trust within and across nations.The language of cooperation: shared intentionality drives variation in helping as a function of group membership.Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election.Peace Data Standard: A Practical and Theoretical Framework for Using Technology to Examine Intergroup Interactions.Promoting Collaborative Classrooms: The Impacts of Interdependent Cooperative Learning on Undergraduate Interactions and Achievement.Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial GroupsNo Evidence for the Watching-Eyes Effect on Human Impulsivity
P2860
Q28601915-62DC78F8-5C08-452D-A1C1-7C0629A7BE7BQ30277141-28FE0BBE-2593-4C4D-8B1C-20D07F16CE4CQ33917535-A07095E8-35BA-4DE0-9EA0-9E0AB36C06C1Q35082118-889B8DE8-AE63-4C56-985C-92F3C81EE925Q35545352-08A45DFB-CFBA-4008-8FDF-BAAD08BF48C5Q36008700-89E55D1C-F0DD-4D6D-94BE-CFADBD071176Q36054549-BEFAEED7-0949-4421-8055-3C191EC48AE8Q36194065-4294D747-259C-4559-9428-7A29F1E0DCAEQ36388549-1664C109-03C7-4E70-BBF8-FA9AB007F516Q37281643-DAF37809-953D-4CE8-9DF7-4DC51BAC5229Q37305059-C5118CD8-30E0-4CD4-B971-4F10020F0C36Q37484089-9C06912F-528A-4415-A693-A76E5F17D72CQ37489037-43FD875B-35A1-4740-8256-9DA2E2C2F8F1Q37601433-1DACEF42-7AA8-4E7D-9ED7-3067AEBE0044Q38547737-253428BB-D036-47B5-AE38-916C89E400C5Q38751788-7CF8553F-CECC-4FF4-9FA3-D3A2CFC769B7Q40050966-79263B4D-8BB5-47A6-A168-2E10A309725DQ40349196-94481198-B461-4101-9181-159C2A6E9340Q41849480-ACEAEADE-BBD0-4DD7-A039-5433A59FBD10Q42667390-D1FDA167-6F15-470A-A9D8-CB9A06C7B56CQ42694218-7385452C-D16B-4C40-8C0D-8F25C64AD094Q47275988-1FA257AC-2D41-40AA-A59F-AA2F7D5A49D9Q47279202-12BD9193-D0A9-413F-9C44-35452B09A9F2Q47398148-2AB9FF97-62AA-4901-8AE4-9C07E38D2654Q47409748-8735BC40-777B-4B83-B9AD-A0A116D5F277Q47547373-91A75683-45B2-4004-AC5D-FDE80EF334D9Q47664038-984218F6-00E6-43D5-8252-6E9B169B11AAQ47761650-1DC510E7-4115-4466-B700-7091CB37CB26Q48112919-7E77B033-54AC-4A44-BC89-2702336071EEQ48276972-E4EE4440-AB69-4A92-B124-C69DB492B5BBQ49886948-CD6780DB-2E80-46B2-9C08-1CB4E6B4CAF8Q50112988-3BC9669A-56A6-4466-A89A-29F3FBE01B39Q53757473-624AFC32-1D7C-4FA4-B4FA-B6A4A0FFC3D8Q55078343-A07BA8C7-C1A5-4B13-B7E4-0C0E6D4AB2BCQ55083349-D70A48B2-40A8-4129-B195-577400A0937FQ55402097-99E2B7CB-4243-4B5D-8A8C-11939440C4C1Q56887738-8BAF43AA-C687-45FC-99C2-F9386E9F0D32Q57817652-2CCEB585-F9C0-4621-8E07-6A32BC2BC78C
P2860
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
2014年论文
@zh
2014年论文
@zh-cn
name
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
@en
type
label
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
P31
P356
P1476
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
Carsten K W De Dreu
Daniel Balliet
P304
P356
10.1037/A0037737
P577
2014-09-15T00:00:00Z