The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38320519

about

Policing practices as a structural determinant for HIV among sex workers: a systematic review of empirical findings The Feasibility and Oncological Safety of Axillary Reverse Mapping in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Regime for Bowel Preparation in Patients Scheduled to Colonoscopy: Low-Residue Diet or Clear Liquid Diet? Evidence From Systematic Review With Power Analysis Association between Estrogen Receptor-α Gene XbaI and PvuII Polymorphisms and Periodontitis Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A PRISMA-Compliant Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies The Role of TP53 Gene Codon 72 Polymorphism in Leukemia: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Causes of Death Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Fat Intake Is Not Linked to Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis Statin use and breast cancer survival and risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis Association between diabetes mellitus and multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Benefits and harms of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of vitamin K antagonist associated bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Accumulation of adverse childhood events and overweight in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Rituximab shows no effect on remission in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome: A MOOSE-compliant meta-analysis.Clinical research on postoperative trauma care: has the position of observational studies changed?Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Reappraisal of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and glioma risk: a cumulative meta-analysis.A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome on Endothelial Function, Arterial Stiffening, and Serum Inflammatory Markers: An Updated Meta-analysis and Metaregression of 18 Studies.Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews.COX-2 rs689466, rs5275, and rs20417 polymorphisms and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of adjusted and unadjusted data.Association of circulating leptin and adiponectin with periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Associations between matrix metalloproteinase gene polymorphisms and glaucoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of different enteral immunonutrition formulas in patients underwent gastrectomy Hepatocyte growth factor is a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Relationship between SRD5A2 rs9282858 polymorphism and the susceptibility of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis based on 20 publications FOLFOX regimen plus dendritic cells-cytokine-induced killer cells immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Role of interleukin-12 gene polymorphisms in the onset risk of cancer: a meta-analysis.Interleukin-1β rs1143627 polymorphism with susceptibility to periodontal disease.Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Meta-analysis of programmed cell death 1 polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus risk The comparative efficacy of angiosome-directed and indirect revascularisation strategies to aid healing of chronic foot wounds in patients with co-morbid diabetes mellitus and critical limb ischaemia: a literature review.Conceptualising a model to guide nursing and midwifery in the community guided by an evidence review Interleukin-10 rs1800896 polymorphism is associated with increased head and neck cancer risk but not associated with its clinical stages.Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a meta-analysis.Oral manifestations in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Promoter Methylation of the Retinoic Acid Receptor Beta2 (RARβ2) Is Associated with Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: A PRISMA Compliant Meta-Analysis.Association of Dietary Vitamin D and Calcium With Genetic Polymorphisms in Colorectal Neoplasia.

P2860

Q26738928-2F6C39EB-088C-48AD-A291-79A70AC31AFD Q26766045-A712D12D-40CF-452D-8B6A-830B93959B1D Q26770437-0A42F17E-B526-451C-B82E-9AF0776D9341 Q26774640-8941125F-5C8F-4160-B496-EBF0AE90D5E5 Q26781476-D8A8A775-32FF-49E6-AB1F-DD23664DBC9F Q26781492-B909AB50-33C7-4FCD-A0C0-D55F74C7149C Q26782652-0EA9D483-454C-4B74-A886-320F0CE6743E Q26782724-0FE4786B-0713-4D90-A530-DACBA44B6699 Q26798245-190F4004-0AAC-4DF6-9B17-0D0952590AE2 Q26799504-AE87A9EB-B56D-4D67-9CCE-9C1A7962DF8E Q28082068-72091F81-136F-4DC7-8AEF-F85AD73BD004 Q28468566-3228C5DD-163F-47C5-83C1-47F1D79A111A Q30234372-357C5417-C492-42D9-A420-767BCF784720 Q30234977-04DA5EA2-B9B4-4625-80EA-4F9866BA6CFB Q30240107-7951991A-30F4-4948-A813-CA021EFC0277 Q30248208-AF4EEE5D-9E66-49C1-9496-8903E8E97670 Q30251818-2C890610-DF70-4E47-A053-1FCDFC1CBC20 Q30357320-1FBDF941-93AB-4238-9769-3F43348AF783 Q30380201-F6F1AA0F-62DE-4D11-A32E-518C1397C5A5 Q30488543-B3083CC8-E3C6-457B-A928-E4F963EA5B12 Q30855663-F9F19EB9-4278-4571-8865-AFCD1FF65B38 Q31114559-708B166F-1D62-4C09-9C4B-1C862937377E Q32174112-5596AB15-6EC7-4B97-B87A-F751B8A6EC7C Q33441476-E0C1F288-7843-46CF-88C4-BA34A940DCC9 Q33592640-1E76952E-9EEB-4CAF-A687-C20A932A86CE Q33618687-708E29AD-D2CF-4F86-921F-329561B212A4 Q33618725-88E8404F-16F8-45D0-B76F-228291B68400 Q33672581-08FFFEBC-A374-4078-BB08-602E73D1CC54 Q33722816-F2D97C0C-79A2-45E8-8ECF-CE9B6CD32378 Q33728151-E95573C7-7AB3-4CA8-99B1-5905013E354D Q33761766-9CE7DF50-19E4-4F2C-B111-8499ACFE8BFA Q33788235-E442EC43-ECDD-45C9-90AF-FAF2D98B51BC Q33829687-99AB76B9-B6DE-4FE5-BB0E-95C1A1DD8C89 Q33851145-232D17E3-46E3-4D5E-AB6E-2AE6B61F3E01 Q33858734-0D64D1B2-6C5B-4027-9B2C-4A2C68873B91 Q33913889-BB6D7C3B-4D4E-497E-8034-53F89155AFAD Q35664668-07E66589-A594-4CC5-B91F-6B0243A58911 Q35762161-0EFC66AF-276D-4F83-8083-9DE7A14A7E29 Q35801560-EB36BA58-5CCE-49BB-B8CD-4526F20DC3D9 Q35821016-7FB8B9BC-735E-47C3-80A9-81D8F7DE9754

P2860

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38320519

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年学术文章

@wuu

2015年学术文章

@zh-cn

2015年学术文章

@zh-hans

2015年学术文章

@zh-my

2015年学术文章

@zh-sg

2015年學術文章

@yue

2015年學術文章

@zh

2015年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

The methodological quality ass ...... uideline: a systematic review.

@en

type

label

The methodological quality ass ...... uideline: a systematic review.

@en

prefLabel

The methodological quality ass ...... uideline: a systematic review.

@en

P1433

Q38320519-51D3A96A-C5A3-4318-9838-6DE83E9FE6D9

P1476

Q38320519-16FFEEF4-D94F-4C99-AB88-3BC77A505F13

P2093

Q38320519-109C56D2-6093-44CC-AA41-142CBB2E8083

Q38320519-1A4CE923-46A8-40FA-B6DE-F86540503DF0

Q38320519-8A50F59C-FDB9-4538-B6DB-7FF2B8475471

Q38320519-9C461965-2526-4B47-9AEE-40D6EDD7F54F

Q38320519-B580144E-7D5D-43A5-AD04-9D256E9BFFBE

Q38320519-D683D548-4227-4D2D-A8A0-F7417D20C7D6

P2860

Q38320519-038635CB-53BF-47AC-8F29-98498297741E

Q38320519-05A7E52B-AA7F-469B-B49F-7DCF88A46F61

Q38320519-0B8C1EFE-6D23-4B2D-A3E3-B3EF9D7CCBD0

Q38320519-11AFABBC-D4F6-4903-832D-54CAFEA9A49F

Q38320519-127EA965-34BC-45E4-B44E-607A4D89737E

Q38320519-1B27CACD-2DFE-4814-972F-417346142192

Q38320519-21C49159-BCFA-49C2-8B36-99333756C185

Q38320519-27B51BF6-A4C0-4A00-B137-D70A217A41D8

Q38320519-27E3E70D-1E57-4F2A-80A8-D3C11E64A573

Q38320519-2C3E7BE1-6BD5-43E7-8AAC-141BD57111A6

P304

Q38320519-36AD0724-D227-4F8F-869E-35404011DC9F

P31

Q38320519-95A23AD4-E90B-498D-8A1A-C5E4139A10C9

P356

Q38320519-DF532CBD-7E47-4389-AD91-0E8DE64D74CD

P433

Q38320519-EB8BC692-ACDA-457B-9A26-FDCA42BE87C5

P478

Q38320519-86F9E863-EF6C-43BF-BAB1-97FD13C56AE8

P50

Q38320519-41711430-9463-45B4-A0DF-8D7F84027954

Q38320519-B2662A2D-3513-47F1-8CF6-2AB4073B0234

Q38320519-C2767014-C5BB-4962-98BA-4A85623C0123

P577

Q38320519-5471FB40-9A69-4159-B5DB-77A1276C4B68

P698

Q38320519-A03F2C1F-154F-4E26-A189-3B170468FC36

P921

Q38320519-04D096B2-650C-401D-83C7-FF66ED6C0C12

P356

P1433

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

P1476

The methodological quality ass ...... uideline: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

Chao Zhang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Joey S W Kwong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Liang Du

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sheng Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yonggang Zhang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yuming Niu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses

Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

P304

2-10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/JEBM.12141

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2015-02-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

25594108

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921