about
When fairness matters less than we expect.Scarcity frames value.Anticipated Guilt for Not Helping and Anticipated Warm Glow for Helping Are Differently Impacted by Personal Responsibility to Help.The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?When less is more: evolutionary origins of the affect heuristic.Too good to be true: rhesus monkeys react negatively to better-than-expected offers.Pseudoinefficacy: negative feelings from children who cannot be helped reduce warm glow for children who can be helped.Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: affect shifts preferences for giving.Promoting happiness: the malleability of individual and societal subjective wellbeing.Improving scope sensitivity in contingent valuation: Joint and separate evaluation of health states.Realistic affective forecasting: The role of personality.Risky business: rhesus monkeys exhibit persistent preferences for risky options.Numerical Nudging: Using an Accelerating Score to Enhance Performance.Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results.The subjective understanding of guideline recommendations and of the risks of the side effects of medication.Unit asking: a method to boost donations and beyond.Making sense of nonsense: the visual salience of units determines sensitivity to magnitude.Living among the affluent: boon or bane?Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science.Same but different: Comparative modes of information processing are implicated in the construction of perceptions of autonomy support.Less means more for pigeons but not always.Overearning.Winners love winning and losers love money.Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study.Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemesTheory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales
P2860
Q30275911-3E299A73-E825-45F4-82F2-FB22CA2B6F60Q30487628-C84162AC-B108-4B46-B949-5677BCE7C82EQ30815626-C92CDF6F-4F2F-4492-9121-DD6BAECF0419Q34266106-C546E41D-A71C-4220-900A-27CC907F4D91Q34441263-1E813AE7-CC48-4F41-A349-2AFAD4ACC430Q35018402-C89CA56A-D932-4F23-A307-DEE9EE6FF16FQ35616977-396F5EA5-7DB4-4977-A30A-A890DBE967DEQ37251968-078C7471-410A-4BFB-8DF8-55DAE3E910AAQ38095563-76D9D3C4-6B2B-424C-85E4-A312018A2512Q38823723-1A0ADDA5-3B1E-47FB-AD6D-2DBB99C43683Q38981049-05789465-4D71-4067-9A20-4F3C74B0996EQ39104683-24269A24-C43E-4871-AAA3-3DDEA357EB52Q40482587-740599E7-75B7-4152-AB9C-E8AC0775A633Q41480729-14C3EAE1-0DA3-4796-9398-8EF0FCEDED75Q42939173-3C2D6FF2-CDE9-44B9-9A69-6796FF271EB2Q44033427-C0CDF9C1-0013-4894-A5D4-B73E2CE8DCA3Q44099046-A672A59B-55BD-4B4A-913F-088451D170FEQ45269901-1DCEEF87-45EA-4B0C-AF63-1F9F58DD2120Q46671932-3B3BD0AC-41BB-4AFE-BC0E-F272F481F7F9Q47372438-491CCF68-EA73-4D8C-9204-F2D09D379442Q47783991-4D8F5D38-BB9C-49A2-B9B0-A0641A8EB646Q48031266-BC4D6746-F58F-4FCA-AB9E-BBAA791B088BQ48140477-58D37761-54E1-40B5-A118-4E7909EE3A05Q53425117-287D816F-7DF4-409B-9321-A22A593DDF32Q55194676-184C0DF4-204E-4D2B-A7DF-E5BDAA479691Q58765260-E05AB9E7-F49D-42B2-B381-957F00DAF041Q59308292-CA847B36-4B4C-4071-95EA-512DA9B7E899
P2860
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
General Evaluability Theory.
@en
type
label
General Evaluability Theory.
@en
prefLabel
General Evaluability Theory.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
General Evaluability Theory.
@en
P2093
Christopher K Hsee
Jiao Zhang
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/1745691610374586
P577
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z