Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.
about
Design, implementation and reporting strategies to reduce the instance and impact of missing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data: a systematic review.Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC)Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.Influence of the mode of administration on the results of medication adherence questionnaires.A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study.Electronic applications for the CFQ-R scoring.HDQLIFE: development and assessment of health-related quality of life in Huntington disease (HD).Understanding the need for assistance with survey completion in people with Huntington disease.Using Online Methods to Develop and Examine the Hong Kong Chinese Translation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale.International validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BRECON23 quality-of-life questionnaire for women undergoing breast reconstruction.Standards of reporting: the use of CONSORT PRO and CERT in individuals living with osteoporosis.Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization
P2860
Q31108599-28E50120-911F-41A5-B09F-765383E1D75CQ31156221-766BDE1F-E979-4079-B0BC-9350DD14E0AAQ37693136-A9E703AC-38CB-4213-B406-48D6C95C40ADQ38676056-D9E38268-17CC-4F17-9AE2-38903B6572E7Q39329193-99DA5724-8CE3-477A-BA80-2376190520DFQ42344797-67C6B3E6-CB9F-40E9-9F7A-04C55FBD9B6BQ45296829-06F7FBF7-1832-42B7-A172-E9C287974E7FQ45305928-C8F4C28C-6D5E-4013-9200-DFFDBE71E72CQ47767567-C3939FAD-3193-4B82-90D9-BF4D443BFCA3Q48342366-21803C5D-B494-4A95-84DB-BA7233C7B55EQ52478641-B1327FF9-84CF-443C-A028-1AB4D66D11CEQ53273552-B7233036-EB4D-4F03-9CF0-9C1B2F6F55FFQ55520921-E10C5615-1CE9-4723-9C18-F9B523C50087Q59135171-6F15DC29-AA2B-4770-B54C-8D88F20F7A3E
P2860
Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Mode of administration does no ...... come results: a meta-analysis.
@en
type
label
Mode of administration does no ...... come results: a meta-analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Mode of administration does no ...... come results: a meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Mode of administration does no ...... tcome results: a meta-analysis
@en
P2093
Daniel Costa
Holly Rice
Madeleine King
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11136-015-1110-8
P577
2015-09-03T00:00:00Z