A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38622825

about

Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Investigating community ownership of a text message programme to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy and provider-client communication: a mixed methods research protocol.Coping strategies and styles of family carers of persons with enduring mental illness: a mixed methods analysis.Satisfied carers of persons with enduring mental illness: who and why?Prospective integration of cultural consideration in biomedical research for patients with advanced cancer: recommendations from an international conference on malignant bowel obstruction in palliative care.The experience of nursing women with breastfeeding support: a qualitative inquiry Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies.Rationale and procedures for nesting semi-structured interviews in surveys or censuses.

P2860

Q27010263-42DB0039-E497-4004-A06D-44421C050889 Q30541018-6EE509A4-9647-496F-B04A-13DE43FBA591 Q33757914-676DD5B7-9DD1-4E8D-99CB-84F67B5BDA00 Q33912296-11E0593D-4089-4624-B2DD-85CE83E46814 Q36116597-88057339-3EE9-4D64-BB78-200C5B59296F Q36121452-CCF26D03-D6E6-4F02-A5C2-FC3E69A2C8B6 Q36166611-379CD58E-49B1-433E-ADA1-A053E300AB73 Q36618317-9B8C303D-0E83-48B3-92B0-A70DDD86F11E Q37113982-A2EE4955-7B50-4BD7-943C-4A63309480CE

P2860

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38622825

description

2004 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2004年の論文

@ja

2004年学术文章

@wuu

2004年学术文章

@zh-cn

2004年学术文章

@zh-hans

2004年学术文章

@zh-my

2004年学术文章

@zh-sg

2004年學術文章

@yue

2004年學術文章

@zh

2004年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

@en

type

label

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

@en

prefLabel

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

@en

P1433

Q38622825-081E3078-6E44-425B-A4FC-953BE3585EDC

P1476

Q38622825-D68C73A2-C40C-4F67-BDA7-00D12FFDB78C

P2093

Q38622825-29B3B467-F3BB-411D-B205-0771BF0C1EDE

Q38622825-F4A92D6C-E721-48B4-9371-043F7D50C358

P2860

Q38622825-01B9CEAB-57A8-49F6-84B9-82415B330ECE

Q38622825-1BF4FA90-F6B2-4F75-94DC-1D023C4AA3C4

Q38622825-25934350-9EA6-4A4D-9D76-56E7A78B0315

Q38622825-3657527A-AEE1-4981-AB0F-C131184D126F

Q38622825-4B34925D-26FE-4EC9-AA9E-862122615920

Q38622825-5B0C92BD-A061-4740-8325-8BA868FD92C6

Q38622825-7450B922-3030-4E9A-8CC8-6F4A35F77E1B

Q38622825-7AD3F2B9-740A-4EB5-900C-87C584D4FDA6

Q38622825-7F5D91F0-9FA7-4B55-8EC4-8D9943202614

Q38622825-84767F20-A4E3-4857-8712-C54271956198

P2888

Q38622825-AC75D661-1529-4FCF-A294-4B612801FEFD

P304

Q38622825-58E4FA75-BAF4-48CC-8DC1-E3F6D1C14A91

P31

Q38622825-8A9B3A19-05D9-4232-BA93-993C3A6B3255

P356

Q38622825-53E02C81-F059-4BEE-852F-CE638E8C2ACB

P433

Q38622825-BCC01EC5-2A7B-4CEA-9390-F3CB3532D9CB

P478

Q38622825-998E9094-71FD-434E-992A-143C3216F071

P577

Q38622825-16E230A9-3D03-4D45-AF18-926C68700518

P6179

Q38622825-30557C09-98F1-4E55-B5FD-D07EE9C5B4E6

P698

Q38622825-F0D0443B-99E9-47A5-B953-A69C668BF303

P932

Q38622825-B23C3E78-D695-4E31-A231-2412C2E42744

P356

B:QUQU.0000043126.25329.85

P1433

Quality & Quantity

P1476

A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies

@en

P2093

Joanna E M Sale

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kevin Brazil

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.

Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.

Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis

Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research.

Reengineering and the hospital staff nurse.

How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

How to critique qualitative research articles.

Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.

Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Assessing the methodological quality of published papers.

P2888

b:ququ.0000043126.25329.85

P304

351-365

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1023/B:QUQU.0000043126.25329.85

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

38

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2004-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1041632030

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26526412

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4623761

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string