Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species.
about
Quantity judgments in the context of risk/reward decision making in striped field mice: first "count," then huntQuantity Discrimination in Domestic Rats, Rattus norvegicusDefining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are brokenComparative Cognition: Past, Present, and Future.Difference in quantity discrimination in dogs and wolvesTrained Quantity Abilities in Horses (Equus caballus): A Preliminary InvestigationThe "Clever Hans Phenomenon" revisitedLemurs and macaques show similar numerical sensitivityThe role of body surface area in quantity discrimination in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare)What counts for 'counting'? Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment taskVisual nesting of stimuli affects rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) quantity judgments in a bisection task1 < 2 and 2 < 3: non-linguistic appreciations of numerical orderDoes the stimulus type influence horses' performance in a quantity discrimination task?Do Social Conditions Affect Capuchin Monkeys' (Cebus apella) Choices in a Quantity Judgment Task?Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fishA shared system of representation governing quantity discrimination in canidsThe importance of replication in comparative psychology: the lesson of elephant quantity judgmentsBears "Count" Too: Quantity Estimation and Comparison in Black Bears (Ursus Americanus)Large number discrimination in newborn fish.Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM.Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay taskFemale meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics.Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) treat small and large numbers of items similarly during a relative quantity judgment task.Zebrafish prefer larger to smaller shoals: analysis of quantity estimation in a genetically tractable model organism.Glimpse of ATOM in non-human species?One, two, three, four, or is there something more? Numerical discrimination in day-old domestic chicks.Numerical acuity of fish is improved in the presence of moving targets, but only in the subitizing range.Relative versus absolute numerical representation in fish: Can guppies represent "fourness"?Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items?Abstract numerical discrimination learning in rats.Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores.Quantity estimation and comparison in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula).Cross-Modal Correspondences in Non-human Mammal Communication
P2860
Q21129158-4C98D8B2-B559-4BCB-A1EF-892DBAB471ABQ28597237-A4B43607-1B6F-475E-92F4-01707369BE11Q28651591-6C6C1B21-E796-4737-B572-67100768CFB9Q28651690-09E53C1A-1E01-4C08-85CC-05B953AEB615Q28652040-83CBC486-FCCC-4EAD-85E6-F70A672779CBQ28652740-FCE796F0-CACA-4C37-9769-A9834C0D8355Q28659217-D8B8E7E8-5023-4598-96E3-197BAEC7A461Q28660640-978B2547-84E2-4C55-806D-423EBFFDA4B1Q28660963-55D099E8-62B8-4589-A50B-A83049F02A9CQ28682002-BC1CBFD9-61D2-455B-9B5F-8B60C7A2DB1DQ28686903-DD49F100-ACD6-4EF3-91C2-C8D7AE6AF5E4Q28709515-8F0634FB-ED49-4517-BABA-52BFAAA3FEB4Q28712002-EDA4898E-9102-4C01-A4BD-95E514EEB716Q28712003-E24B1D8E-4936-445F-9C60-40201E4E3DCDQ28712486-431F7923-82C4-4A7A-82D6-05F46C448A43Q28727281-0C8675EA-357F-4588-9F1F-2C869BB3178FQ28728962-F468AB7B-D57C-49E9-B962-F939A082D21AQ28729133-6DFB32B2-23B2-4F7C-804C-2DA6038C95E4Q34693179-73F36C85-68FD-4D69-9D79-D884FC68188AQ37014539-62AE3361-1E84-4204-BAA9-95494FB991B3Q37281861-FE39EC2E-A31C-42A7-9458-BF28EB5D2845Q37705170-40D7AE5E-F25C-4236-ACE0-E3C49BED0BECQ37716066-B0A1CD63-1AD6-4095-B433-47633B66B1F1Q38675167-9BB5EA17-F789-4EE1-A049-9EC20FD92A9EQ38724848-38108D16-6445-4A70-9381-CF8B15CFA454Q43081076-C5F73911-CA2F-415B-82E2-B8DBBCC41BE4Q43688959-39533124-B718-4EBE-8EF1-B3B07F85DB59Q45843051-36EC1CB8-65E1-45BF-B98B-CDC711E4D870Q46747923-1412B196-9600-49D1-9C52-3CB35890DA24Q47194534-BEF94ED7-FCD3-493B-97FB-7A97E437EDCCQ50537355-258D5032-BF54-4FA8-B097-FADD2DD2C938Q50549400-B8EE81E5-6A6F-4562-91F3-AC6369319734Q50707345-C42D2F3D-6B5D-434C-8515-43CC812C5D02Q54949281-935A4C17-4CFB-4CE8-936E-A7BF1DC101B1Q59292606-DF41DD6C-EEC1-4C7E-B065-860B2243076E
P2860
Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Putting the elephant back in t ...... match those of other species.
@en
type
label
Putting the elephant back in t ...... match those of other species.
@en
prefLabel
Putting the elephant back in t ...... match those of other species.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Putting the elephant back in t ...... match those of other species.
@en
P2093
Adam M Stone
Bonnie M Perdue
Catherine F Talbot
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S10071-012-0521-Y
P407
P577
2012-06-13T00:00:00Z