Is tutobone an efficient alternative to other implants used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries?

about

Is tutobone an efficient alternative to other implants used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries?

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38715414

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Is tutobone an efficient alter ...... scectomy and fusion surgeries?

@en

type

Item

label

Is tutobone an efficient alter ...... scectomy and fusion surgeries?

@en

prefLabel

Is tutobone an efficient alter ...... scectomy and fusion surgeries?

@en

P1476

Is tutobone an efficient alter ...... scectomy and fusion surgeries?

@en

P2093

Fredrik Prem Nath

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nitin Mukerji

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Savithru Kumar Prakash

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Bone grafting, implants, and plating options for anterior cervical fusions.

Clinical, radiological and histological study of the failure of cervical interbody fusions with bone substitutes

Use of autologous bone graft in anterior cervical decompression: morbidity & quality of life analysis.

Anterior cervical discectomy for one- and two-level cervical disc disease: the controversy surrounding the question of whether to fuse, plate, or both.

A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion

Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation.

Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation?

Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

P304

340-344

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/02688697.2017.1297362

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2017-03-06T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28637120

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string