Characteristics and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses on Hypertension Treatments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

about

Characteristics and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses on Hypertension Treatments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38834054

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Characteristics and Methodolog ...... ments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

@en

type

Item

label

Characteristics and Methodolog ...... ments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

@en

prefLabel

Characteristics and Methodolog ...... ments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

@en

P1476

Characteristics and Methodolog ...... ments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

@en

P2093

Clarence C Y Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Martin C S Wong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robin S T Ho

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Samuel Y S Wong

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xin Jian Du

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xin Yin Wu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Essential Hypertension : Part I: Definition and Etiology

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary

The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report

The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews

Publication bias in clinical research

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality.

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

P304

137-142

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/JCH.12889

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Benjamin Hon Kei Yip

V Chung

P577

2016-08-06T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27495352

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

meta-analysis