A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

about

Measurement invariance, the lack thereof, and modeling change.Measuring what matters to rare disease patients - reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures.

P2860

Q38618894-34E58308-504F-4C6B-B207-907D121BBA65 Q47102105-197B3008-3225-4411-A00F-066136161D8F

P2860

A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38895797

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年学术文章

@wuu

2016年学术文章

@zh-cn

2016年学术文章

@zh-hans

2016年学术文章

@zh-my

2016年学术文章

@zh-sg

2016年學術文章

@yue

2016年學術文章

@zh

2016年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

A review of empirical research ...... cal outcome scale development.

@en

type

Item

label

A review of empirical research ...... cal outcome scale development.

@en

prefLabel

A review of empirical research ...... cal outcome scale development.

@en

P1476

A review of empirical research ...... cal outcome scale development.

@en

P2093

Carrie R Houts

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Linda S Deal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael C Edwards

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

R J Wirth

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures.

Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data.

Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.

Parameter recovery and model selection in mixed Rasch models.

Applying mixed methods to pretest the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life (PU-QOL) instrument.

Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.

Sample size in factor analysis

P2888

s11136-016-1364-9

P304

2685-2691

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S11136-016-1364-9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-07-13T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27412522

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

about

P2860

P2860

A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P698