Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.

about

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review.Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research.

P2860

Q47105003-AD602514-3F40-43E8-9ADA-A76A7654D09C Q49967526-B7FAC415-B6E4-495C-A917-47FF77EFD4C5

P2860

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38932863

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Effect of standardized trainin ...... ent tool: a prospective study.

@en

type

Item

label

Effect of standardized trainin ...... ent tool: a prospective study.

@en

prefLabel

Effect of standardized trainin ...... ent tool: a prospective study.

@en

P1476

Effect of standardized trainin ...... ent tool: a prospective study.

@en

P2093

Alison Diaz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Bradley C Johnston

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Brooke Beckett

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Bruno R da Costa

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nina M Resta

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Susan Armijo-Olivo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Why the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Should not Include Funding Source as a Standard Item

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis

Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.

Development and evaluation of a pedagogical tool to improve understanding of a quality checklist: a randomised controlled trial

Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.

The use of expertise-based randomized controlled trials to assess spinal manipulation and acupuncture for low back pain: a systematic review.

Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals.

P2888

s13643-017-0441-7

P304

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S13643-017-0441-7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Matthias Egger

Peter Jüni

P577

2017-03-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1084252608

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

28253938

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

bias

P932

5335785

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.

about

P2860

P2860

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P921

P932