Quality of qualitative studies centred on patients in family practice: a systematic review.

about

Quality of qualitative studies centred on patients in family practice: a systematic review.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38953362

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Quality of qualitative studies ...... practice: a systematic review.

@en

type

Item

label

Quality of qualitative studies ...... practice: a systematic review.

@en

prefLabel

Quality of qualitative studies ...... practice: a systematic review.

@en

P1476

Quality of qualitative studies ...... practice: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

Benoit Cambon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Bruno Pereira

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hélène Vaillant Roussel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Isabelle Aubin-Auger

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Laurence Michel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Philippe Vorilhon

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies

Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: analysis of publication rates

Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research

Is qualitative research second class science? A quantitative longitudinal examination of qualitative research in medical journals.

The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers.

Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor: a vicious circle that is detrimental to science.

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles.

The rationing debate. Defining a package of healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case for.

P304

580-587

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1093/FAMPRA/CMW095

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-09-12T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27623689

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string