Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?

about

Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30.How Should DCE with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?

P2860

Q47261501-7DF5FF39-C24D-4B5B-B671-54F227091BCF Q47690105-9FA5F7FC-E067-44F9-9B36-FBE98862D52E

P2860

Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39165629

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@en

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@nl

type

Item

label

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@en

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@nl

prefLabel

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@en

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@nl

P1476

Is Dimension Order Important w ...... xperiments Including Duration?

@en

P2093

Brendan Mulhern

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Emily Lancsar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

John Brazier

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Julie Ratcliffe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paula Lorgelly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Richard Norman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rosalie Viney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

EuroQol: the current state of play.

Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: addressing design and sampling issues.

Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Do health preferences contradict ordering of EQ-5D labels?

Order of Presentation of Dimensions Does Not Systematically Bias Utility Weights from a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.

Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D.

The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility Scores.

A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.

The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

P2888

s40273-016-0475-z

P304

439-451

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S40273-016-0475-Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2016-11-21T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27873226

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?

about

P2860

P2860

Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698