Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey.
about
Does computer survey technology improve reports on alcohol and illicit drug use in the general population? A comparison between two surveys with different data collection modes in FranceResponse rates and selection problems, with emphasis on mental health variables and DNA sampling, in large population-based, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of adolescents in NorwayLifestyle surveys--the complete answer?Issues of recruitment and maintaining high response rates in a longitudinal study of older hospital patients in England--pathways through care study.Variation in estimates of limited health literacy by assessment instruments and non-response biasFactors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional surveyComparison of early-, late-, and non-participants in a school-based asthma management program for urban high school studentsAssessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material.Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and womenImproving the self reporting of tobacco use: results of a factorial experiment.Maintaining Superior Follow-Up Rates in a Longitudinal Study: Experiences from the College Life Study.Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.Discrepancies in estimates of prevalence and correlates of substance use and disorders between two national surveys.Baseline participation in a health examination survey of the population 65 years and older: who is missed and why?Risk factors for alcohol and other drug use by healthcare professionals.The 14-year course of alcoholism in a community sample: do men and women differ?Sources of Error in Substance Use Prevalence Surveys.Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS).One-, three-, and six-month outcomes after brief inpatient opioid detoxification.Correlates of treatment follow-up difficulty.A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.Determinants of participation in an epidemiological study of preterm delivery.Epidemiology and preventive interventions: parental death in childhood as a case example.Family characteristics as mediators of the influence of problem drinking and multiple risk status on child mental health.Participation in a mail survey: role of repeated mailings and characteristics of nonrespondents among recent mothers.Enhancing response rates to a smoking survey for enlisted U.S. Navy women.Brothers delay menarche and the onset of sexual activity in their sisters.
P2860
Q28538984-836002A3-B2EF-42FA-A5F3-6AB1218137CAQ30990208-4398C788-D451-43CC-8FA2-2316BFEAA168Q33704083-1C3BCA0A-233C-44D4-A96B-92273B73543AQ33704663-DAD95E82-ABBE-4AF8-A603-97B61CA65324Q33898700-F78C4B48-B068-40C5-836A-A460725D2864Q34225106-52F458FE-FDFA-4272-9088-2CA637CCE4ECQ35078184-5B382048-4F3F-4EE5-8C11-C9CCD51A3A5CQ35113592-36E0B5BD-8526-4AD0-9C28-8A14E3FFC43DQ35406717-E2463D72-E6ED-4A66-8862-92C778E8B38BQ35418823-B8A41948-18A4-4930-9B3C-CA6E4446A58DQ35538492-816F2614-D04D-491E-97CC-BC872BD49E8BQ35663962-3BC8185C-1D9A-42C1-B3F2-5E79D33AC599Q35838475-04EDC0F9-2D2A-47B4-A1A4-F85F8490617DQ35902180-935CAEF7-9903-4C66-9576-779AC80C58EAQ36481612-66F53E6D-FDB4-40F5-9F84-2CA295F32B2EQ36491500-835D4B89-30D8-417F-94DA-DBAF954C5412Q36572535-291763EB-0B97-4529-AA87-E75A364E54F2Q36979059-92418BFE-8BF2-4744-955F-6CDDEE9A0495Q39554455-33B20462-9991-4343-8B90-49F9006AD5BEQ43617317-5EABC23D-9C85-46B0-8909-ED711080EAE3Q43888548-D5669F9D-0A9B-4A4E-B977-E04664C1B5F4Q44836258-0A08A32A-29C5-4CAB-8486-C218415EF8E8Q46151865-AB0CD03A-A131-46D2-BCFE-2A90607465EFQ51157987-53D36900-C8B3-4D40-9CD0-825554FEB020Q52294497-98E51BD7-ECB9-4E59-B115-0BE02A29C4D2Q52911616-E2E18E52-DD36-4A2A-8B45-B96655046561Q53762091-3BF48659-54CE-418D-8AE1-86AF2A337B62Q55462004-4AC553BC-4BBB-4A8F-9294-8ABAB0949688
P2860
Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey.
description
1987 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1987年の論文
@ja
1987年学术文章
@wuu
1987年学术文章
@zh-cn
1987年学术文章
@zh-hans
1987年学术文章
@zh-my
1987年学术文章
@zh-sg
1987年學術文章
@yue
1987年學術文章
@zh
1987年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@en
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@nl
type
label
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@en
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@nl
prefLabel
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@en
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Difficult-to-recruit responden ...... es in an epidemiologic survey.
@en
P2093
Cottler LB
Spitznagel EL
P304
P356
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A114534
P407
P577
1987-02-01T00:00:00Z