Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
about
Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic reviewEvaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: a collective case study of Ontario's safer needle regulationReducing percutaneous injuries in the OR by educational methods.A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.Safety engineered injection devices for intramuscular, subcutaneous and intradermal injections in healthcare delivery settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysisEfficacy of safety-engineered device implementation in the prevention of percutaneous injuries: a review of published studies.Risk Reduction of Needle Stick Injuries Due to Continuous Shift from Unsafe to Safe Instruments at a German University Hospital.Risk of exposure to bloodborne infection for Italian healthcare workers, by job category and work area. Studio Italiano Rischio Occupazionale da HIV Group.Differences in percutaneous injury patterns in a multi-hospital system.Costs associated with sharps injuries in the Swedish health care setting and potential cost savings from needle-stick prevention devices with needle and syringe.Economic Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions From the Employer Perspective: A Systematic Review.Factors promoting consistent adherence to safe needle precautions among hospital workers.Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.Safety-engineered device implementation: does it introduce bias in percutaneous injury reporting?Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.Perioperative use of the hands-free technique: a semistructured interview study.
P2860
Q26740470-DF1485F6-7672-4BB1-8E56-C25344E5ABF6Q28393608-14299313-C5F2-4EF7-8DD8-69B4CEFAECFDQ34044807-278E12CB-D46D-4AEF-AAAD-14B89356CEA9Q35680804-99EDBCD8-E846-49B9-B3CC-9CD28DCEE6D1Q35882964-0C60F43E-C71B-4321-A448-CCC1FF52410AQ36119195-B5F4A567-04CE-46A9-86AC-B1F234FA6DF4Q36436843-FFB44512-58ED-4B0E-8DE9-376FA66FD993Q37337020-D7E119F0-DBAD-445C-8E25-3994C7207151Q39568913-D9C5F9C1-2249-4132-8654-A2050E78CD2AQ39668337-8F4F8364-E636-4A81-B96D-D2C6B4A57DD0Q45188179-DEF19807-5200-40C4-A33C-A6C0D5470047Q49351031-60656877-FB05-4113-A3B1-23B49E5FFCAAQ50143895-1DA82FDC-F951-49F5-B11A-745363E0F06DQ50747369-5BD61A11-DF45-4F39-ADAC-357EC0780FCEQ50747373-5EAE89F9-538A-4F8B-A61D-6E4D0F3A2495Q51076732-446F37B4-3912-4C76-89F3-AFD953FCFFC3Q51141904-76EB0411-BB01-4D81-AF1D-BC3DD445BE40
P2860
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年学术文章
@wuu
1995年学术文章
@zh-cn
1995年学术文章
@zh-hans
1995年学术文章
@zh-my
1995年学术文章
@zh-sg
1995年學術文章
@yue
1995年學術文章
@zh
1995年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@en
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@nl
type
label
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@en
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@nl
prefLabel
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@en
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@nl
P2093
P1476
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1016/0196-6553(95)90264-3
P577
1995-12-01T00:00:00Z