An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
about
Should processed or raw image data be used in mammographic image quality analyses? A comparative study of three full-field digital mammography systems.Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis.Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: parallel-cascaded linear systems analysisSolid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.A GPU Simulation Tool for Training and Optimisation in 2D Digital X-Ray ImagingEstimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time.Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image qualityThe x-ray light valve: a low-cost, digital radiographic imaging system--spatial resolution.Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging systemDetectors for the future of X-ray imaging.Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images.Evaluation of a flat panel digital radiographic system for low-dose portable imaging of neonates.Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.Impact of resolution and noise characteristics of digital radiographic detectors on the detectability of lung nodules.Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material.The x-ray time of flight method for investigation of ghosting in amorphous selenium-based flat panel medical x-ray imagers.A hand-held beta imaging probe for FDGImaging properties of digital magnification radiography.Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum.Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
P2860
Q30791576-642B94F9-6343-4526-921F-E4920E589155Q30960507-EF17C8AA-8E84-4F0B-9CFC-9A774E69F6C0Q33213196-F3001B57-72CD-4C17-A2D2-815077000ADEQ33655499-515B3743-6B9D-4701-B164-23EEEEAEFD3CQ34423508-D4C510E2-02A0-40A1-BA37-B655A1FA6D30Q34473972-E5D8B40F-C9CD-42DE-B1BB-FAD63820A7DDQ34598173-E45DABC8-1764-4595-8079-E2EE09C29760Q34789801-ED98E92D-D377-4CEB-8F98-75320E2EE626Q34790343-9D21013E-C064-49E3-ADCA-6C7680F4707FQ35834428-85F47FF9-FD33-45CB-8452-56CD3D06D2B1Q36300602-DCD0DB59-6B62-43C9-9644-37548C630F93Q36701889-D9778384-5534-41C8-AFBB-436CE628BAC2Q36766054-4170DEE8-BF95-4021-91AA-3DE44092D453Q37145911-B1A7975D-43BC-4E29-A903-8D8E296B35F7Q37170387-09800238-5411-4DD5-9C0D-3DC9B1ECC3FAQ37215317-02B02353-8B2B-4E6E-A8EA-A64B9D99C678Q37579868-EA7494F2-1722-400B-8659-F60039D52F02Q37704019-7A5696DF-5230-471D-A9E8-3A551DFF3251Q37853482-63F76B5D-0E44-4E30-92DD-32667BA722B4Q39325544-34DFFCF2-0472-45B8-A346-85158FFA00FEQ39648255-938E916F-8568-46D4-A816-D12BA5C78938Q39657100-BB4F53AA-E3AE-40E7-A973-BD0B3FB2E47AQ39668486-BF81458E-C424-44C1-BB08-5FC64B382F96Q39670775-75334BF2-47A4-423C-9982-BD0063D2C0EEQ39675478-E0EAAC93-7CC0-487A-959A-5DE95141EDA7Q39684002-260DACF4-CB28-4A87-A031-99F1F9609533Q39687157-6A9917DE-AF5B-4191-92A2-70684E81F245Q39690071-B81AB692-6850-4A4A-B8B2-763A22696078Q39697839-45566F7D-93E2-44F5-B93B-75666D861EE5Q39705069-B2B85C50-3BC1-416E-B4CB-3CF92A654884Q39711745-F8A91F40-B1AD-431A-B4E0-B348ECA395C9Q39711757-478BF191-540F-459E-88BB-E8D077587EA7Q39728065-DB8F1CDB-576C-4202-A9D5-9F6E34A2AE08Q39735818-CE868535-C864-405B-B7DE-3144F2DF3FB8Q39736840-4CE54AF7-514D-4916-89F4-AE89F2EBA7A5Q39754958-40518BCC-A0A3-42E7-A955-01C5DC9354B9Q39757582-EC711020-2CB4-4DC1-89C7-60A4F38FFE01Q39757589-181FE058-0B82-4513-A47D-07F3E30BD312Q39763690-C242AB98-C009-4582-895E-1ADF735DD227Q39812005-59A80E53-D1D5-4275-B40E-E726BBEC21B7
P2860
An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@nl
type
label
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@nl
prefLabel
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@en
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
An experimental comparison of ...... t digital radiography systems.
@en
P2093
Ehsan Samei
Michael J Flynn
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.1561285
P407
P577
2003-04-01T00:00:00Z