Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
about
Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are goingSaudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancerLaparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcome data: how should surgeon's performance be reported? A retrospective learning curve analysis of two surgeons.Blunt apical dissection during anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy.Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gapAre histopathological features of prostate cancer lesions associated with identification of extracapsular extension on magnetic resonance imaging?Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomyVisual cues as a surrogate for tactile feedback during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: posterolateral margin rates in 1340 consecutive patients.Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer.Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method.Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram.Saudi Oncology Society clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer.Risk Factors for Intraprostatic Incision into Malignant Glands at Radical ProstatectomyDisease-specific outcomes of radical prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time.Obesity and positive surgical margins by anatomic location after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysisVariations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy.Integration of gene expression profiling and clinical variables to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomyVariations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomyThe importance of an extended lymphadenectomy in the management of high-grade invasive bladder cancer.Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations.Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.Lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer. II. technical aspects and prognostic factors.Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Quantitative, spectrally-resolved intraoperative fluorescence imaging.Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomyRobotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.Impact of socioeconomic factors on prostate cancer outcomes in black patients treated with surgery.Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes.Trends in radical prostatectomy.Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.Optimizing cancer control and functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy.Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.Prognostic prediction following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer using conventional as well as molecular biological approaches.The Prostate Cancer Registry: monitoring patterns and quality of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer.Dataset for reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.
P2860
Q24648688-ACD6A510-2551-4A1D-B151-0CC266BD3390Q26747782-E94919E4-84AE-400F-9D03-444FEC38B279Q31123730-1165E069-1B05-4C20-88C2-C9EBD5487F84Q33417993-1D5D0552-ECD8-4676-BE6E-7E4186742844Q33606053-1CDF343F-67CE-4B3C-8685-01B2574683E8Q33699276-18C9785F-A90C-48B5-A038-19DAB2004274Q33759725-A41A69A3-551F-4A95-B3F8-C3DD6BF39DFAQ33943176-78B68E7B-27EE-49A0-B050-DD653FD38C62Q34101399-4DA2DD0B-E869-41B6-8688-D22981F17D94Q34437308-8BEA00E3-663B-4C98-BA3B-A900A6723CB2Q34467381-8FFAAFAF-27F5-4D82-ABB2-049BA2F71F17Q34731414-3C06DB9A-D26C-4558-83C5-AE4313CC9479Q34997355-34E2D229-39A6-49FC-B5B1-75F0EE3CD9ACQ35033755-D393F405-C5A2-4CE7-8068-CA643760079EQ35188264-465F1A1A-0B20-4B97-A1F1-9A1C6B1A85D3Q35220313-F3C73B6B-FBEE-45A3-8182-F1882BB574DFQ35360084-F8A32EF3-C553-4643-B619-C775B34CC00DQ35630139-5C8CC9D7-EA7C-4162-85AD-DB61E166B8B4Q35751889-B161A5B7-2D3F-4A39-B4CA-CCB73F3A117CQ35758299-55A71FED-46FB-48DD-9BC4-88EBB69BE246Q35865722-BF79BD39-4F35-4BD0-9FB4-D1501D0BA022Q35987743-F293155F-E95C-4748-9B08-703A520025D2Q36042302-7616B4C1-9F0F-472F-B6A5-3C873EF17440Q36194308-0609E9C6-B14B-4331-8F71-089560816BA8Q36194959-73B2AA3A-D9DB-45F9-84EC-1480ADCC43BFQ36375415-BD79658D-E3FB-4BF3-9D51-5D999FE8369AQ36385264-BCF52865-72CE-4279-B136-9FFE2C003F58Q36397667-2633B10C-2773-43EE-B949-F9AA9E8AE971Q36458146-F57727E4-BC42-424A-942A-B8962948FDA3Q36748537-4156B6A4-D259-4D0D-B272-8E9D1CA3B2CDQ37092779-5B1FEA36-A058-441C-AA52-886568831C87Q37247401-C92E81A5-319A-4E91-A8E9-12FC5200773EQ37381775-EF1F82B1-314A-44BB-8814-23EF5327E87BQ37421927-F0060864-2765-414A-9E5B-E9DB6B4F4042Q37761845-3B614419-9CCF-4A16-9C62-93210ED00550Q37791394-F65C7A7F-4566-4766-9DD0-5850000C7AD5Q37931473-9EFE1BF3-8526-4B6F-A22B-7D50F4075DEBQ38047420-D32F3AB0-41E6-4127-9BB4-A229F6B0F97FQ38056990-0AC0C340-BC5B-4087-88D8-C288C3287F4FQ38067446-06F101F1-C97B-4587-A339-2876C4D1309B
P2860
Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@en
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@nl
type
label
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@en
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@nl
prefLabel
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@en
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Variations among individual su ...... dical prostatectomy specimens.
@en
P2093
Claudia Gerigk
Colin B Begg
Elyn Riedel
James A Eastham
Michael W Kattan
Mithat Gonen
Peter T Scardino
Thomas M Wheeler
Victor Reuter
P304
P356
10.1097/01.JU.0000091100.83725.51
P407
P433
P577
2003-12-01T00:00:00Z