Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
about
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experimentPreference for pharmaceutical formulation and treatment process attributesApplying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reportingWhat are the preferences of health care professionals in Germany regarding fully liquid, ready-to-use hexavalent pediatric vaccine versus hexavalent pediatric vaccine that needs reconstitution?Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juriesAssessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative dataUS valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview studyPatient preferences in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health CareDeveloping attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventionsPatients' preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancerPreferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experimentMeasuring preferences for analgesic treatment for cancer pain: how do African-Americans and Whites perform on choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis experiments?Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experimentDiscrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.Public stated preferences and predicted uptake for genome-based colorectal cancer screening.The preferences of users of electronic medical records in hospitals: quantifying the relative importance of barriers and facilitators of an innovationUnderstanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data.A quantitative approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a health professionals' perspectiveDeveloping attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural MalawiConsumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methodsParents' preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.Generating Individual Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC) AnalysisUsing a multidimensional unfolding approach to assess multiple sclerosis patient preferences for disease-modifying therapy: a pilot studyDeterminants of intravaginal practices among HIV-infected women in Zambia using conjoint analysis.Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: addressing design and sampling issues.Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experimentsWhat Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?Community Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs--the PAraDOx Study.Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.Multicriteria decision analysis methods with 1000Minds for developing systemic sclerosis classification criteria.Identifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia.Patient preferences for surgical versus medical therapy for ulcerative colitis.An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.The willingness of US pediatric dentists to use atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with their patients: a conjoint analysis
P2860
Q24658523-D7B4BA69-8B92-4FF9-BD7E-270744F822E5Q26741298-072709B8-579A-4CAD-BCB4-BB78B644E51AQ26772051-C41FF88C-EE10-44BF-BB94-E8F417901E65Q26775900-1D14757A-E637-458E-8779-FBBB4E7A2800Q26863705-4B95449D-7CA6-4D90-8A10-725767EC9E1FQ26864906-AFE5F2BB-7F49-4491-83CD-11355D4AF845Q27308886-87E959F2-6C2D-4812-A081-07B6DF15D84AQ27314819-0DEC3B1B-56C0-445F-857B-318ECC3158F8Q27336251-F960F82B-2B9C-446C-8045-80B5A9497DA6Q27692660-890F725F-7CE5-46CA-B098-15D21454DF11Q28072872-F68A4B77-ED34-498E-A779-E4E61C7F3234Q28077639-98A02100-B733-4FCE-9110-3AF81DC90F60Q28396145-9526848C-4D37-4114-84AF-6979F6D63D60Q28596813-ADC8CE74-A45C-48FF-99FE-CD6B9606EC54Q28659121-CF8D752B-598D-4CF8-BD3A-668FCD4EC3EBQ30235008-2697A985-256D-433D-95ED-6741F07FAE9EQ30365074-DEE2498B-8FAE-40AE-A2DD-6F9744368EB2Q30381933-CB5E31B2-D4B1-4E84-A909-7AE1F93D0909Q30557139-B9144560-3AE9-4CFA-85D6-29A0DC0C1A45Q30576161-9A391D9E-0817-46AC-BE6F-3F7E15EB954CQ30577041-CB7A42F0-4FAA-40B0-9311-C4EECD7BC6FAQ30583226-FA233D54-AD24-47EB-95B5-13456817448FQ30870323-5C5FE82B-DEA1-422C-9075-B13E3CDFAE7BQ31132423-076BDA31-F565-4A26-8B3B-CEE7ABCE7D36Q33657799-AD6DBF95-6E70-4031-A7B9-EB55B9A6E15DQ33695793-D7875EFA-31B1-4BBF-9F0D-1A1AD0E89B10Q33719736-0C562B29-7EB7-4D1A-8317-5A6D00E181BAQ33725528-D4E25979-4D78-43D3-8EEB-59FE6DDCD5DCQ33768847-9BDF9833-DE1D-477E-8656-DF9C33D9E420Q33771955-4C30AFA8-6149-4F51-91F7-7CB5FD6F0617Q33818374-D16FA87F-4353-4863-89B5-023A43F6C0A9Q33893350-A9618D4D-666B-4B4B-8A64-AA032F5AA749Q33910927-A42E96A0-A887-43F9-9A50-4039FA5B65D1Q33911637-4AF69871-F0F9-4885-9803-3F3066805558Q34026426-D3BD9B50-7A2C-48A4-B814-29C53BE90557Q34052086-0E18FF6A-B004-4220-92E1-8247BAC7E7A2Q34065382-4D274460-5426-4068-975A-59B9B70BF640Q34065549-07972219-82B9-43CB-A146-DAE25362E162Q34164094-CCDB23B4-06CB-4A00-9D83-1BF7C15C3F58Q34175423-883284BF-90C9-47E9-B630-AA43BECCD89D
P2860
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@en
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@nl
type
label
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@en
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@nl
prefLabel
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@en
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Conjoint analysis applications ...... Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
@en
P2093
A Brett Hauber
Andrew Lloyd
F Reed Johnson
John F P Bridges
Josephine Mauskopf
Lisa A Prosser
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JVAL.2010.11.013
P577
2011-04-22T00:00:00Z