Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
about
A survey of laboratory and statistical issues related to farmworker exposure studiesAugmentation of cognitive and behavioural therapies (CBT) with d-cycloserine for anxiety and related disordersAugmentation of psychotherapy with d-cycloserine for anxiety disordersCase-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speechAlternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratioOutcomes research in the development and evaluation of practice guidelinesEffect measures in prevalence studies.Epidemiologic measures and policy formulation: lessons from potential outcomes.Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacistsWhen is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomesEnteric pathogens and reactive arthritis: a systematic review of Campylobacter, salmonella and Shigella-associated reactive arthritisEstimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological dataComparison of robustness to outliers between robust poisson models and log-binomial models when estimating relative risks for common binary outcomes: a simulation studyA regression model for risk difference estimation in population-based case-control studies clarifies gender differences in lung cancer risk of smokers and never smokersMeasures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regressionAccounting for misclassified outcomes in binary regression models using multiple imputation with internal validation data.One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.Using group data to treat individuals: understanding heterogeneous treatment effects in the age of precision medicine and patient-centred evidence.Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?Re-interpreting conventional interval estimates taking into account bias and extra-variationAnalyzing musculoskeletal neck pain, measured as present pain and periods of pain, with three different regression models: a cohort studyDental caries risk studies revisited: causal approaches needed for future inquiriesStrength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology.Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populationsThe Parasol Protocol: An Implementation Science Study of HIV Continuum of Care Interventions for Gay Men and Transgender Women in Burma/Myanmar.Current view of epidemiologic study designs for occupational and environmental lung diseasesApplying the theory of planned behaviour to explain HIV testing in antenatal settings in Addis Ababa - a cohort study.Extension of the modified Poisson regression model to prospective studies with correlated binary data.Unmet need for family planning, contraceptive failure, and unintended pregnancy among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Zimbabwe.Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: systematic review with meta-analysis.Alcohol intoxication/dependence, ethnicity and utilisation of health care resources in a level I trauma centerEvaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size.Geographic variation in hypertension prevalence among blacks and whites: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosisMethods for meta-analysis of individual participant data from Mendelian randomisation studies with binary outcomes.A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data.The effect of adding ready-to-use supplementary food to a general food distribution on child nutritional status and morbidity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Effects of being uninsured or underinsured and living in extremely poor neighborhoods on colon cancer care and survival in California: historical cohort analysis, 1996-2011.Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables in randomized trials with stochastic compliance.Stochastic counterfactuals and stochastic sufficient causes.
P2860
Q23911555-56C42C02-C195-470C-B43A-6221F13E7074Q24187995-6FD41E1D-F32B-4EE7-BF06-420817F40C0CQ24240358-14AC1FFE-3FEA-4858-8C71-F37047B97413Q24548855-31ADB33D-0E64-4251-87AB-739D70083FEEQ24797650-BFFE6488-FEC5-4C53-B909-F0DA39D28FFBQ24806205-4760C060-F528-4447-8E65-035D9484D075Q24815047-2DD5C891-6D54-4D51-8166-4A26996DF2DFQ24815102-0E88F2B4-0D9B-4928-B3DB-C01FEA5863A8Q26341607-7EC28678-7FF1-4A90-ACAB-BC1AC0A1FED6Q26995449-60D83A99-FAFE-45EA-AE98-C1D0AFF33172Q27014731-91A5C569-38AA-4A3B-A3DE-CB57EC706891Q28387044-0FA3927E-CE1D-4D5F-B05E-90F1946F0A4FQ28389304-7E21B44C-6631-419E-83F4-E8BCE07E0325Q28391788-0EBFC473-143A-4CA9-821A-D4DC294049EBQ28397674-922F2E44-6E4C-4A29-B5B1-CF876D31B2D3Q30777273-F1F70386-5933-46A7-96D3-FE35F0CE173FQ31103088-5AE72779-DD8F-4877-ABE4-CF8AC9EC1C19Q31143342-F5A04AF5-3DC1-42E2-92CC-ECCFBFE0F5D3Q32061298-8594E733-0013-4E8D-B048-CAB7B50EE749Q33260509-532DD99D-68F1-4E6D-805C-CD16BDD10B7AQ33471779-73ADCD70-47F3-40FD-A78D-A1C03E25681AQ33566912-71A773D5-2335-4B64-8658-1A6956629B5DQ33577720-EAD337E5-6A28-48A7-89AF-087083A488F0Q33707149-91038899-ED8F-4C24-B347-460F6CDC136CQ33736096-E19DF57C-D87E-424E-A2D4-11CD3CE2DD5FQ33747649-A17A95A6-A4EA-4F6C-841B-511406A94F9DQ33994776-B3B7654F-FF45-484A-BCD7-BD310775875CQ33996128-D81F3801-CD84-41C7-B451-914004F3A6A2Q34071277-C09F4E2D-C1BA-47DF-B26F-8B1EB763BFFBQ34075440-23EDADCC-04F9-4CAE-A5D9-93455ED66B7AQ34147108-9D671208-E62F-41F1-89C6-D35E3B47E59FQ34242325-F2537926-E757-49D1-9EBF-A135B519F1A5Q34286383-ACDABA6A-2F02-405F-9AEF-1DAC08AFFBD9Q34305244-6355C406-625E-4FE9-AEC6-F95CB7F4ECCFQ34311112-0A6B9B97-5AC5-4C60-97EE-886FCD500B17Q34366876-AFA19CEA-03DC-4F52-A1A3-CEBCD27ABD6EQ34426291-BD165AC0-95B6-493F-95CD-C3CA09BCD994Q34455690-B315C571-667E-41AD-9267-45F1BEE7EA3CQ34488143-0220F228-24E5-4C8A-B999-3D41B07CBA58Q34598752-E1461EEE-8FF1-40AA-A40E-1BE8B6F7384B
P2860
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
description
1987 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1987年の論文
@ja
1987年学术文章
@wuu
1987年学术文章
@zh-cn
1987年学术文章
@zh-hans
1987年学术文章
@zh-my
1987年学术文章
@zh-sg
1987年學術文章
@yue
1987年學術文章
@zh
1987年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@en
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@nl
type
label
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@en
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@nl
prefLabel
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@en
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@nl
P1476
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.
@en
P2093
Greenland S
P304
P356
10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A114593
P407
P577
1987-05-01T00:00:00Z