Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
about
Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions.Surgery for spinal stenosis: more thought, less metal?South Korean degenerative spondylolisthesis patients had surgical treatment at earlier age than Japanese, American, and European patients: a published literature observation.Neurosurgery concepts: Key perspectives on imaging characteristics of spinal metastases, surgery for low back pain, anesthesia for disc surgery, and laminectomy versus laminectomy and fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.Posterolateral Fusion Versus Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emerging Techniques in Degenerative Thoracolumbar Surgery.Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.Circumferential fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by distal junctional grade 4 spondylolisthesis in the sub-acute post-operative setting.Commentary on: Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis by Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. NEJM 2016;374 (15):1424-34.Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.A retrospective review comparing two-year patient-reported outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization for TLIF vs. PLF for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?A novel strategy of non-fusion instrumentation with coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Nursing review of diagnosis and treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.Achieving Optimal Outcome for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Randomized Controlled Trial Results.Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial).Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Current Concepts and New Evidence.Postoperative Opioid Use, Complications, and Costs in Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.Association of decision-making in spinal surgery with specialty and emotional involvement-the Indications in Spinal Surgery (INDIANA) survey.Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis by Microscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression: A Technical Note.Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.Postoperative Evaluation of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL) of Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis After Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion (PLF): A prospective Study With a 2-Year Follow-Up.Operative and Perioperative Durations in O-Arm vs C-Arm Fluoroscopy for Lumbar Instrumentation.A rethink of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up.In Reply: Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.The Predictive Value of Preoperative Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Scores in Lumbar Spine Surgery.The 2-Level Experience of Interlaminar Stabilization: 5-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Experience Compared to Fusion for the Sustainable Management of Spinal StenosisSpinal Stenosis in the Absence of Spondylolisthesis: Can Interlaminar Stabilization at Single and Multi-levels Provide Sustainable Relief?Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: A narrative reviewComparison of Decompression Alone Versus Decompression with Fusion for Stenotic Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
P2860
Q33576918-E0E0AD1E-1514-4026-9B1F-F9F3B7F32D76Q37291664-6C53F104-CD6C-46AA-9899-C8D16BCA7095Q37570087-CF4B6939-8354-4648-8A35-FBF5EEF17CCCQ37620985-7AEFC50A-361E-4406-A5F1-901C6DF2866CQ37732107-5605C13F-EFE0-402B-B97C-920930C72CEFQ38641943-E1E92F7E-4B4F-419E-B42B-68DBEEB87B22Q38710314-79D9D7E5-E4BF-40E3-B454-10D291FCA9E4Q38841463-336E9ED0-1428-48CC-A765-679BD4D74329Q38865427-DA5475E5-3174-443B-A96B-3583A19B64EEQ38870890-7D684DDF-F110-4519-ADC5-947F85610052Q38995837-9ACBDD41-5D62-4E82-ABFE-A38150D7C1D2Q39159685-F344A194-9334-4654-9808-C75212F6F40FQ39188092-AF30964B-B86F-4EEF-85FF-491DC46BEB6AQ39192839-015268FC-B4F9-4B61-B182-8D6904B49622Q39353663-5548F087-6052-4E4E-98D4-528BDFDCB0A2Q41355778-EBF4F28B-F52F-47CF-9499-DD91379CAD5AQ42390316-BF15DC5C-EB5F-48A8-B3ED-8900F13F92D3Q42390318-9AE49D40-51D3-44C6-B983-1BBA366B2C4DQ43234941-4AC58452-9E13-4D7F-BA1A-6920005CB93DQ45067217-AD0265C0-DA78-483E-B9C1-49A87BC397EAQ46260892-929F4D6A-EC6B-480C-995D-BD9C72E04861Q47096133-EA645D67-36A1-4241-82DF-E30B00417840Q47351931-677B4D04-3325-47F7-B75A-D248FE6BF62AQ47561540-E9F050CF-E188-4E51-871F-3AE1AE3607E1Q47828923-188705C8-1519-4472-96E0-00C565345580Q47999571-87E2DBBE-FDB9-4F32-ADD3-76D505630DE6Q49391476-40299829-0188-42FB-8561-2FFAFC6DB0BAQ49649433-8434ABEF-5095-4A00-B816-76046C852978Q50600811-53D92EAC-0EBC-4E48-8E39-1240148031FFQ53827834-F5B2FF3E-B216-44FF-A245-C4168493B4E7Q54570239-97EE5341-8083-483B-AF64-8EEDA71B63DDQ54917919-0EEDA248-D9ED-45B0-8B81-C1CFBB75EB97Q57130705-EABAE578-8EC7-439E-8081-F53DF3DEC3B0Q57147182-159B7A2D-267F-4BE5-A112-E3981D48FFE8Q57646620-10038EDB-19C0-423B-822D-D1858E1243E1Q57824064-EF4CA365-9B9B-4216-A333-C67222E57532
P2860
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@en
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@nl
type
label
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@en
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@nl
prefLabel
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@en
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
@en
P2093
Edward C Benzel
Fred G Barker
J Fred Harrington
J Sanford Schwartz
James Dziura
Jean-Valery C E Coumans
Norma Terrin
Subu N Magge
Volker K H Sonntag
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA1508788
P407
P577
2016-04-01T00:00:00Z