Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
about
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: towards broader applications of existing methods.Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventionsPreferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experimentPatients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data.[Incentives to attract and retain the health workforce in rural areas of Peru: a qualitative study].Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experimentUnderstanding clinicians' decisions to offer intravenous thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.Splash!: a prospective birth cohort study of the impact of environmental, social and family-level influences on child oral health and obesity related risk factors and outcomes.Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care modelsAn empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in AustraliaPatient preferences for adherence to treatment for osteoarthritis: the MEdication Decisions in Osteoarthritis Study (MEDOS).A generalized measurement model to quantify health: the multi-attribute preference response modelIncentives for non-physician health professionals to work in the rural and remote areas of Mozambique--a discrete choice experiment for eliciting job preferences.Measuring the Preferences of Homeless Women for Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions: Development of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment.Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments.Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.Alternative approaches for assessing the socioeconomic benefits of medical devices: a systematic review.Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.'I will choose when to test, where I want to test': investigating young people's preferences for HIV self-testing in Malawi and ZimbabweValuing Individuals' Preferences and Health Choices of Physical Exercise.Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment.Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: A discrete choice experiment.A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare.The better than dead method: feasibility and interpretation of a valuation study.Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment.Head-to-Head Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Health Values.Willingness-to-pay and preferences for warfarin pharmacogenetic testing in Chinese warfarin patients and the Chinese general public.A discrete choice experiment on preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: the identification, refinement, and selection of attributes and levelsAustralian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies
P2860
Q27308886-99AF384B-2F16-401B-9863-F54522EC9802Q27691635-85F61069-45A7-4289-8D7C-068063059A71Q28077639-B63FC70A-8BCF-4C97-8509-BB8097F81C1DQ28596813-F45E9AD5-0D0C-415E-9EB3-731AFE7269B1Q30235008-91506EC8-E913-4EA1-8D85-F543D09D4335Q30687369-BF40F7F9-2FBB-4285-A1AA-6435AA8504A7Q30870323-8D8613C5-A3AE-4DB9-9F57-57B9CDE5AAB0Q33817282-539B936E-186A-4203-B38E-99B57AB74904Q33834025-A6754FC0-7495-423B-8ABF-12E47181BACFQ33879828-9DFB673F-D10F-4157-A7C4-83D3E48A865EQ33943904-C7287F64-229A-4DD5-BDE5-DAD8DE3308B8Q34091305-C435319C-CFF8-4A26-A5BF-52B2817113A6Q34164094-37B03D79-EF59-4F5B-A968-50BA8CB5F369Q34169202-0451B0C6-5B82-46B5-9A5D-DB084A2F2131Q34310563-A28B174B-DFD4-4B75-9FD0-7DA6CB1BC25BQ34707575-C4320E2C-8EF4-4A6E-BD6E-B31F446D6CDAQ35053174-B7C85E23-BD1E-4EE4-9590-D304BF0ED363Q35555770-E72B5D57-A3EA-49FA-AEC9-9149180F4B3DQ35850521-C2B33242-CA88-441A-A77F-2ED8EE34B294Q36968477-30D93874-E7C6-4878-A51F-70658E118924Q37366526-ABB625E3-4EBF-48E6-AC05-F0003E3011E5Q38031819-D334031C-6E2A-4D96-88CF-CF9E2D96D0BAQ38072719-8DC369A4-7720-459E-9624-87042604131DQ38219609-600907D3-1F57-44CF-A83D-02A246DA3CA0Q38221971-B00F2FD0-A97B-4B64-ADA1-D2FAC5B8D81CQ38573545-0F7FD742-AEB3-4755-97F6-968A5F74761EQ38682667-76980BDB-9CE0-4B4F-9A73-69BA16E34BD4Q38700062-ABDC0B47-6D95-404D-A0C2-91B8AB05507CQ42240452-916D3F5E-D0B2-4E67-A243-41685DF3EFB1Q45394209-5758494E-4CCB-43AC-B0DA-5F6A17B08151Q47112606-B04CD071-47A0-4BF7-89BB-FE79E5459EF5Q47410326-CB8E2483-86DA-481A-8441-DEF0CBC18CA2Q47563453-9245B748-0AD7-4461-AC49-D965882E8AADQ48026261-D900D3DF-F418-436F-A4B3-1F88A65F830AQ48075818-1F334C8C-FB9A-49B1-85F1-9223C153C4FAQ48589939-2E596B1D-1E26-45A9-AD91-55F1109062F6Q52603310-E29B1463-3C98-467A-A990-DD2F95D9704BQ54257592-F95BD360-505E-45C0-86CC-19857BC8F707Q57168078-C9DC3772-C43B-4CF5-9ACA-CC42169C5CA6Q57574202-1B29345F-AC64-4D9D-ADA4-C817504FBBE5
P2860
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@en
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@nl
type
label
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@en
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@nl
prefLabel
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@en
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
@en
P2093
Emily Lancsar
Jordan J Louviere
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S1744133109990193
P577
2009-10-01T00:00:00Z