Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
about
Effectiveness in professional organizations: the impact of surgeons and surgical staff organizations on the quality of care in hospitalsThe sickness impact profile. Development of an outcome measure of health careUsing the Knowledge Base of Health Services Research to Redefine Health Care SystemsMethodological challenges associated with patient responses to follow-up longitudinal surveys regarding quality of careExploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data.Evolving principles of office quality assuranceP.S.R.O., quality of care, and research.Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.Developing criteria for quality of assessment: effect of the Delphi technique.Barriers limiting the implementation of quality assurance programs.Suboptimal ward care of critically ill patients. Suboptimal care should have been defined.Quality of care and utilization assessment. The hospital response to PSRO.ACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertensionMedical audit, continuing medical education and quality assuranceNontraditional problems of antihypertensive management.Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare.Theory and practice for measuring health care quality.The RCGP and other countries: a beginning.Process and outcome in medical consultations. Evaluation on a pulmonary service.Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality.Physician extenders, protocols, and quality medical care.Perinatal care in British Columbia: Diagnosis and management of hemolytic disease of the newborn.Technique evaluation of foster care in chronic psychiatric disorders.Clinical vignette-based surveys: a tool for assessing physician practice variation.Medical audit in general practice.Quality of care in general practice: can it be assessed?The Jeremiah Metzger lecture. Information transfer in the service of Medicine.Quality by any other name?: a comparison of three profiling systems for assessing health care quality.The diagnostic evaluation of risk factors for urinary tract stones: an analysis of care patterns in five hospitals.Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.Clinical subtypes of core premenstrual disorders: a Delphi survey.Family Practice-What's The Difference?Hospital quality measures: are process indicators associated with hospital standardized mortality ratios in French acute care hospitals?Evaluation of primary care in a community clinic by means of explicit process criteria.Computerization of the Medical Quality Improvement program at a chronic care hospital.Application of qui tam to the quality of health care.Developing a cooperative provider-based statewide peer review service: early experience.Concepts of quality and the provision of periodontal care: a survey.The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.Quality of medical care: a factor analysis approach using medical records.
P2860
Q24520532-243706CA-DA84-4F69-BDA7-C4A6BDB3070AQ24685038-8E99A3A6-AA73-4183-AAB0-BF419BD3D997Q28082530-7D531FD4-5450-4189-B980-D46DA9A78504Q28768551-87785F3F-E869-41F1-A22D-3A6587C87823Q30855412-DEC95627-8AB3-4513-9458-B54B90FB5DE2Q33616114-C486B124-86F1-4B71-8202-660C8F54FE1DQ33617081-FE07CE6B-DBEC-4EFB-B936-FBB08F17F9A1Q33718005-BEF4E888-781E-4138-AA3F-A493E87F8F5EQ33730771-F956559F-2C1B-4F65-9EA9-73392AD3C4AEQ33731038-6FA6E3ED-B4CB-4522-9987-BED5BDF0DD61Q33793140-EEA2DAFC-5280-450E-A16C-07869D207F72Q33824375-6CA2E360-6616-49A1-8BE3-001E26637E8BQ33837575-8FADC3C3-B653-446E-8BC5-A09EF553DD2AQ34050267-09C52E4A-BCC1-4186-BAE3-05A285BC182FQ34107555-33551D7D-9CAB-4283-90AF-89D948D7FD64Q34298475-8ABB32BB-3E51-443E-B6E3-053FFEC763D8Q34329265-A81E3A4C-1C7D-40B2-8112-C5CC9708911BQ34368003-5769B7F5-8180-441C-8F43-0E9E5926FBBFQ34421208-A302725E-2F0C-4182-8D89-EE39A61E298FQ34660421-7D639F41-CB7F-4600-8C61-3764A080957FQ35656041-05156FAB-B4B9-4803-A705-8C4BF8735D26Q35939404-499CF186-F751-48FB-BD47-68584DA078BFQ35960082-C41826BC-AE81-4BDB-8AF8-34325F1560C5Q36160684-F2BD8216-1970-4A57-B110-D593D8084C86Q36303513-61B99716-EACC-4BB0-8ED2-4BF3DF79BA9DQ36304775-A487655A-1A87-4A96-965B-B86CC706537CQ36447523-6A91D9AD-4D04-4891-AFB8-B9860BA5C494Q36478510-3357ECF3-76B6-4628-99B9-C1121E826500Q36999405-68B31BB5-97FC-40F8-9890-A7EB09DB5869Q37975990-00BFBEBC-DB3A-43FF-B6A1-7B21A950C816Q38071915-8D6825D0-3E51-442D-8199-43A18BE05833Q38423089-75252EAC-3509-43CF-AF94-FCB057E7AFAFQ38613702-524124CB-F98D-4553-9EB2-8444DB3D80E7Q39346149-2C75D28F-F98D-4AF1-A882-8266935C380DQ40726031-9B0C0169-5B1D-4745-A1EF-8DD0B02CCA98Q40829906-E4F099CE-C56A-43B3-A746-169363B62E05Q41078036-6835F3B5-182C-4BE4-AA83-37A7772557C5Q41732070-9CCB59D9-07D8-4866-A9C1-1DFFEB60D549Q41814758-10593A3B-9D07-4010-BC40-33C05E0CBC5DQ42712663-F97F00B4-07D5-4184-ADBD-678A5D1A1CAD
P2860
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
description
1973 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1973年の論文
@ja
1973年学术文章
@wuu
1973年学术文章
@zh-cn
1973年学术文章
@zh-hans
1973年学术文章
@zh-my
1973年学术文章
@zh-sg
1973年學術文章
@yue
1973年學術文章
@zh
1973年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@en
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@nl
type
label
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@en
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@nl
prefLabel
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@en
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@nl
P1476
Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJM197306212882504
P407
P577
1973-06-01T00:00:00Z