Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].
about
Transcriptional reprogramming and stimulation of leaf respiration by elevated CO2 concentration is diminished, but not eliminated, under limiting nitrogen supply.Utilizing intraspecific variation in phenotypic plasticity to bolster agricultural and forest productivity under climate change.Elevated temperature is more effective than elevated [CO2 ] in exposing genotypic variation in Telopea speciosissima growth plasticity: implications for woody plant populations under climate change.Intraspecific variation in juvenile tree growth under elevated CO2 alone and with O3: a meta-analysis.A synthesis of the effects of atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on plant hydraulics: implications for whole-plant water use efficiency and resistance to drought.Genes responsive to elevated CO2 concentrations in triploid white poplar and integrated gene network analysisImpacts of groundwater discharge at Myora Springs (North Stradbroke Island, Australia) on the phenolic metabolism of eelgrass, Zostera muelleri, and grazing by the juvenile rabbitfish, Siganus fuscescens.Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Accurate RT-qPCR Data Normalization in Coffea spp. under a Climate Changes Context of Interacting Elevated [CO2] and Temperature.Cell Wall Metabolism in Response to Abiotic Stress.High CO2 concentration as an inductor agent to drive production of recombinant phytotoxic antimicrobial peptides in plant biofactories.Elevated CO2 interacts with herbivory to alter chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf temperature in Betula papyrifera and Populus tremuloides.
P2860
Q30674606-6DBC9453-BF47-48D1-BBDA-B925B994BCCFQ30843354-AEEA5BAF-34CC-44C7-87A2-CE9DCF4814EDQ30963074-6B1E4061-E1CC-45AB-9835-0A1CE60AF9F1Q31078398-CBF88F07-D4A6-4625-A913-42D26BB9805EQ31136583-DA3A83B4-C55F-4966-BB1B-31BCE52CAAEDQ33645600-E6AAE69F-BC9F-42BE-B063-01DE9889082EQ35225789-F76D6175-3FFB-4A11-8E8C-047811FF3CF2Q36317139-7C5B8AD5-93F2-4F07-BB99-2A73484C4C5BQ38822861-0E28A094-7B22-411E-8C10-7C99DDC58501Q50856068-8BE11F26-E8B2-4D1E-ADC0-7C1C208764D5Q52734556-549916EC-AE97-45A8-A23E-75D247E60450
P2860
Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@en
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@nl
type
label
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@en
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@nl
prefLabel
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@en
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Transcriptomic comparison in t ...... patterns under elevated [CO2].
@en
P2093
Alistair Rogers
Chung-Jui Tsai
David F Karnosky
Gopi K Podila
Holly L White
Leland J Cseke
Matthew P Nelsen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1469-8137.2009.02812.X
P407
P577
2009-06-01T00:00:00Z