A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.
about
Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic reviewDigital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methodsThe Short-Term Effect of Weight Loss Surgery on Volumetric Breast Density and Fibroglandular Volume.Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammographyAutomated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.Type 2 diabetes and mammographic breast density among underserved women.Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancerMammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.Determinants of the reliability of ultrasound tomography sound speed estimates as a surrogate for volumetric breast density.An Investigation into the Consistency in Mammographic Density Identification by Radiologists: Effect of Radiologist Expertise and Mammographic Appearance.Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control studyEvaluation of breast parenchymal density with QUANTRA software.Quantra™ should be considered a tool for two-grade scale mammographic breast density classification.Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental ScreeningMammographic Density as a Biosensor of Tamoxifen Effectiveness in Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Opportunities and Implications.Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.Differences in breast density assessment using mammography, tomosynthesis and MRI and their implications for practice.Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classificationVolumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study.Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density.Impact of errors in recorded compressed breast thickness measurements on volumetric density classification using volpara v1.5.0 software.Volumetric breast composition analysis: reproducibility of breast percent density and fibroglandular tissue volume measurements in serial mammograms.Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.Using Speed of Sound Imaging to Characterize Breast Density.Current and Future Methods for Measuring Breast Density: A Brief Comparative ReviewUsing ultrasound tomography to identify the distributions of density throughout the breast.Volumetric mammographic density: heritability and association with breast cancer susceptibility loci.Diffusion-weighted imaging of the high-risk breast: Apparent diffusion coefficient values and their relationship to breast density.Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
P2860
Q26773994-6210ED5F-5F91-4CBE-ABCC-945CECFBDA49Q27008091-DBA388A1-C233-442D-9053-9A8E77B35B2EQ28364666-80111870-74DB-491C-A75F-F257CD709C0FQ30275608-8F8250F5-658C-4B1F-AE01-024373FB0775Q30711555-6BA787BC-6D74-4C23-AB24-597B09F1D005Q34199209-DD76C08A-6F12-4082-8E27-595899C4546CQ34374548-A3C4A33A-552B-4DDC-8D10-B66AF51034E9Q34995690-ABE3C8DD-7F56-4727-8E1D-4B7646A2F9B2Q35007742-AE125C5F-E666-4A0B-A0AF-558B07749EE5Q35111717-2F5E5462-4AD0-459F-A5A2-BEEF8960BA3FQ35425404-BE29AD12-B1F0-4864-9500-95F6D880A8EEQ35619641-DAD76180-850A-432C-9AF7-5EED9B012FF6Q35763517-9D062570-AC19-4B56-8E74-60EB27435D30Q35995305-CF060A67-1B85-4B6D-8352-06E56F4C585DQ36053352-68AD1BF9-6252-4A9C-8FEA-7E28D1368FEEQ36062561-EBE63DF6-212D-43BE-A425-0815A96D420AQ36069837-341FA966-E4C4-4F35-8212-0F0C86FDF030Q36409840-7CF370F9-1C75-4C88-9111-63CAA5E6B6D1Q36839285-2B8D1608-9AC6-418C-9186-F87014714621Q36950678-6E68E4C8-A943-4305-B35F-C73413509DB5Q37130113-27506C62-80DA-43DE-BC60-68A0514DE5B1Q37314904-9DC57C2C-E45D-4F7A-A7F7-E18046247FCAQ37371864-305D2FE8-AEF4-410E-8A71-24AB0EE911BAQ37402187-AF041AF6-7F29-49DD-BA03-C42C8351EEC1Q37499889-43A5C4A6-5018-4F34-A8C1-E6EC3FE88CCFQ39347821-AC125435-AB80-4C4E-A0BB-F7C5C32378C2Q39700109-8AD36EE0-EC5A-4C86-B0ED-2FADB1E3BC29Q40126179-78FE9587-7030-4D5D-AFCE-9D06E1E3F858Q40176220-02413D89-E99E-4A83-BEA6-E4D4E2733FC2Q40180963-3FB09C9C-5E1A-4EC7-9D6E-5CED790CA6AFQ40230571-6890B528-C41D-49D2-8004-31A1D9E91947Q40346116-20997714-C728-46F2-B8B0-112DEB375D05Q40558108-9606EA57-5336-4C93-A998-7767A841B180Q41698507-04B6F0F3-37B6-4DC1-BCC0-E485668C6CC4Q41703418-9B78DAF6-DDB2-4A24-A8D9-E92F655A9FEBQ42692136-EB8E852F-6F24-4ABF-BE23-AE114A43B35EQ43412691-F3B73A10-894C-478B-9072-00361F45FE73Q46219002-D55327B1-4862-4EC5-BCDC-11548FEDBF2AQ47437578-95073B31-AE86-4DF2-BDD7-0484EBA0512FQ47642637-0E1CCDCA-21CB-41B6-A68C-D5E65D17D2D8
P2860
A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
A first evaluation of breast r ...... ared to visual classification.
@en
type
label
A first evaluation of breast r ...... ared to visual classification.
@en
prefLabel
A first evaluation of breast r ...... ared to visual classification.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
A first evaluation of breast r ...... ared to visual classification.
@en
P2093
Antonella Roselli
Barbara Pesce
Carmen Stevanin
Daniela Bernardi
Enrica Moriconi
Francesco Monetti
Giovanna Mariscotti
Manuela Durando
Margherita Tapparelli
Maria Adalgisa Gentilini
P304
P356
10.1016/J.BREAST.2012.01.005
P577
2012-01-27T00:00:00Z